Intra-articular Injection of Lidocaine in Inflammatory Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT05302232

Last Updated: 2022-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-18

Study Completion Date

2022-10-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the contributions of peripheral neurons to joint pain, the investigators plan to ask patients to rate the pain in their chosen joint before and after an injection of local anaesthetic (lidocaine) and steroid into their joint. Lidocaine blocks voltage gated sodium channels (VGSCs) leading to a reversible block of action potential propagation in peripheral nerves. If the pain intensity reduces significantly following lidocaine injection, it suggests that the patients' pain is due to peripheral sensitization, and that this is dampened by the local anaesthetic. If the pain intensity does not change or only falls slightly, then other centrally mediated factors are contributing to pain.

Before the investigators can use this method, the investigators need to ensure that reductions in pain score following joint injection are not due to placebo effect. Therefore, as part of this validation study patients will be randomised to receive either lidocaine plus steroid or, as a control, just steroid injection. The steroid is the main part of therapy as it relieves inflammation over a prolonged period, but is slower acting than lidocaine, and should not have an effect within ten minutes. Any improvement in ranking of pain within 10 minutes by patients receiving just steroid will therefore be due to placebo effect. The investigators hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference in change in pain score before and after injection between the study group (lidocaine plus steroid) and control group (0.9% saline plus steroid). This will confirm the absence of a significant placebo effect and mean the differences in change in pain scores seen in the study group are due to differences in pain processing

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be randomised to receive joint injection of either lidocaine plus steroid or, as a control, just steroid injection. Pain scores (visual analogue score 0-10) in the chosen joint will be collected prior to injection and at 3, 5 and 10 minutes post injection. Pain scores will then again be collected at 1 month and 3 months to determine whether lidocaine reduced peripheral pain long term.

Intra-articular joint injection with steroids is a frequent procedure in usual care and the investigators will only perform this test when a joint injection +/- aspiration is clinically indicated. Use of lidocaine in addition to steroid injection varies between rheumatologists, with 50% of Guys' and St Thomas' Hospital rheumatologists routinely using lidocaine and steroid, and others giving steroid alone. Therefore, all patients will still receive the same intervention they would if they were not taking part in the study, the only difference is measurement of pain scores before and after.

In addition to collection of pain scores, the investigators will collect patient demographics and painDETECT questionnaire, a screening questionnaire which has been validated to identify neuropathic elements of pain in patients with IA.

The investigators hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference in change in pain score before and after injection between the study group (lidocaine plus steroid) and control group (0.9% saline plus steroid). This will confirm the absence of a significant placebo effect and mean the differences in change in pain scores seen in the study group are due to differences in pain processing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inflammatory Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomised to receive joint injection of either lidocaine plus steroid or, as a control, just steroid injection
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Treatment allocation will be single blinded, in that the researcher will know what intervention the patient is receiving but the patient will not.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine plus steroid

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

depomedrone 40mg/ml + 1% lidocaine

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Response to intra-articular injection of lidocaine as a diagnostic marker of peripheral pain

painDETECT questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

painDETECT questionnaire

Steroid only

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

depomedrone 40mg/ml+ 0.9% saline

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Response to intra-articular injection of steroid only as a placebo

painDETECT questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

painDETECT questionnaire

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

depomedrone 40mg/ml + 1% lidocaine

Response to intra-articular injection of lidocaine as a diagnostic marker of peripheral pain

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

depomedrone 40mg/ml+ 0.9% saline

Response to intra-articular injection of steroid only as a placebo

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

painDETECT questionnaire

painDETECT questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of peripheral inflammatory joint disease
* Reporting current NRS pain ≄3 on a 0-10 scale
* Only perform this test when an aspiration and joint injection is clinically indicated and would be given as part of routine care

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 18 years of age
* Unable or unwilling to provide informed written consent
* Unable to comply with study protocols
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding
* If the chosen joint has been aspirated or injected in the preceding 3 months
* Presence of joint damage in chosen joint as assessed by Professor Kirkham on x-ray of the chosen joint (as joint damage itself can stimulate peripheral nociceptors)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bruce Kirkham

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bruce Kirkham

Role: CONTACT

020 7188 5900

Zoe Rutter-Locher

Role: CONTACT

020 7188 5900

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rutter-Locher Z, Norton S, Denk F, McMahon S, Taams LS, Kirkham BW, Bannister K. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of intra-articular lidocaine on pain scores in inflammatory arthritis. Pain. 2024 Nov 1;165(11):2578-2585. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003291. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38888846 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

311106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kinetic Anesthesia Device Study
NCT03344510 COMPLETED NA
IntralipidĀ® 20% for Reversal of Local Anesthetics
NCT03968822 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4