CESI With Low Dose Lidocaine and Transient Weakness

NCT ID: NCT03127137

Last Updated: 2023-02-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

123 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-01

Study Completion Date

2019-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cervical radicular pain is relatively common, often treated with epidural steroid injection (ESI), when conservative treatments like oral analgesics, physical therapy and activity modification have failed. There are no universal clinical practice guidelines for the use of diluents when CESI are performed.

Interlaminar CESI may be performed with or without the use of local anesthetics, due to training bias or theoretical concerns of weakness. CESI without the benefit of local anesthetic as a steroid diluent increases the latency of pain relief and may decrease diagnostic information immediately after a CESI with regard to pain generators responsible for symptoms, and may potentially decrease patient satisfaction.

By evaluating the effects of local anesthetic as a diluent during interlaminar cervical ESI, we will enhance the safety of this treatment with regard to expectations of objective motor weakness as well as post procedure pain control and patient satisfaction in the recovery phase after the injection procedure.

Research Question:

Does lidocaine versus saline as a steroid diluent effect objective upper extremity strength following cervical epidural steroid injection in patients being treated for cervical radiculitis?

Null Hypothesis:

Cervical epidural steroid injections that include local anesthetic as a diluent have no effect on objective upper extremity strength following the injection.

We hypothesized that cervical epidural lidocaine will cause an objective decrease in strength in functional movements of the upper extremity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Experimental Groups: Prospective, randomized, controlled, double blinded trial in patients undergoing CESI for symptoms of cervical radiculitis.

Group #1: Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL 1% lidocaine (total volume 4 cc).

Group #2: Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL preservative saline (total volume 4 cc).

Adults who are eligible to have a CESI with triamcinolone for treatment of cervical radiculitis at the Northwestern Anesthesiology Pain Medicine Center will be approached by authorized research personnel prior to a patient's CESI is performed and will obtain informed consent from patients who agree to participate.

In every subject (Group 1 and Group 2) a pre-procedure NRS pain score, and presence of subjective or objective symptoms of UE weakness will be recorded. Bilateral handgrip, wrist extension, elbow flexion, and elbow extension strength (myotomes C5-T1) will be measured by a trained research assistant prior to the injection procedure using a handheld JAMARĀ® PLUS+ digital dynamometer (Sammons Preston, Bollingbrook, IL) for hand grip strength and a push/pull handheld hydraulic dynamometer (Balego and Associates Inc., St. Paul, MN) for arm strength assessment. Three baseline strength measurements will be recorded for each strength test. Measurements will be taken prior to and 30 minutes following the injection procedure. Patients in Group #1 and Group #2 will also be queried with the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) before the injection procedure and again 1 day after the procedure (administered via telephone).

For Group 1 and Group 2, patients will be randomized to treatment group based on a random computer-generated schedule. Participants will be blinded to the group to which they are randomized. All standard procedures for CESIs will be followed as is standard practice including time out, skin prep, hemodynamic monitoring, image guidance etc.

Per randomization, triamcinolone acetonide 80 mg (Kenalog) (E. R. Squibb \& Sons Limited, Uxbridge UK) will be combined with 2mL Lidocaine 1% or 2 mL preservative free saline and will be injected during the CESI procedure. In all cases, the total injectate volume will be 4 mL in all cases. All injections will be image guided with fluoroscopy, as is the current standard practice. Fluoroscopy time will be recorded.

The participant will be discharged from the clinic with written discharge instructions (current standard practice).

Participants will be telephoned by clinic personnel 1 day after the CESI to assess for subjective weakness in the hands or arms as well as any other adverse reactions. As above, the Upper Extremity Functional Index will be administered at this time.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Radiculitis Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial using control arm plus 2 arm experimental (placebo and active drug)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participant will be blinded to group assignment. Outcome assessor will also be blinded to the randomization.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group 1

Experimental Group 1 will receive Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL 1% lidocaine (total volume 4 cc)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Experimental Group 1 triamcinolone and lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Experimental Group 1 will receive Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL 1% lidocaine (total volume 4 cc)

Experimental Group 2

Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL preservative saline (total volume 4 cc)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Experimental Group 2 triamcinolone and saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL preservative saline (total volume 4 cc)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental Group 1 triamcinolone and lidocaine

Experimental Group 1 will receive Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL 1% lidocaine (total volume 4 cc)

Intervention Type DRUG

Experimental Group 2 triamcinolone and saline

Interlaminar cervical ESI at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone 80 mg + 2 mL preservative saline (total volume 4 cc)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Experimental Group 1 Experimental Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients ages 18 years or older who will undergo CESI for treatment of cervical radiculitis

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Lack of consent
* Any contraindication to CESI
* Inability to communicate with staff or to participate in follow up
* Inability to perform handgrip or arm strength testing
* Cervical spinal cord lesions
* Cerebrovascular, demyelinating or other neuromuscular muscular disease
* Patient request for or requirement of conscious sedation for the injection procedure
* Pregnancy
* Breast feeding
* Sensitivity to amides
* History of allergy to local anesthetics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Walega

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Walega, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Peloso P, Gross A, Haines T, Trinh K, Goldsmith CH, Burnie S; Cervical Overview Group. Medicinal and injection therapies for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD000319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000319.pub4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17636629 (View on PubMed)

Stav A, Ovadia L, Sternberg A, Kaadan M, Weksler N. Cervical epidural steroid injection for cervicobrachialgia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 Aug;37(6):562-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03765.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8213020 (View on PubMed)

Cicala RS, Thoni K, Angel JJ. Long-term results of cervical epidural steroid injections. Clin J Pain. 1989 Jun;5(2):143-5. doi: 10.1097/00002508-198906000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2520395 (View on PubMed)

Botwin KP, Castellanos R, Rao S, Hanna AF, Torres-Ramos FM, Gruber RD, Bouchlas CG, Fuoco GS. Complications of fluoroscopically guided interlaminar cervical epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;84(5):627-33. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04862-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12736872 (View on PubMed)

Rowlingson JC, Kirschenbaum LP. Epidural analgesic techniques in the management of cervical pain. Anesth Analg. 1986 Sep;65(9):938-42.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3017152 (View on PubMed)

McCormick ZL, Burnham T, Cunningham S, Kendall RW, Bougie D, Teramoto M, Walega DR. Effect of low-dose lidocaine on objective upper extremity strength and immediate pain relief following cervical interlaminar epidural injections: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Oct;45(10):767-773. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101598. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32784231 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00204980

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intrauterine Lidocaine for Laminaria
NCT01541293 COMPLETED PHASE1