Comparison Between High-speed Drilling With Irrigation and Low-speed Drilling With Irrigation
NCT ID: NCT05286866
Last Updated: 2024-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-18
2023-05-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Fifty patients were included in the study according to the selection criteria.The osteotomies were randomized in two groups: the control group was performed under the high-speed drilling (800 rpm) with irrigation technique and the study group under the low-speed drilling without irrigation technique (50 rpm). The randomization tool was www.randomization.com.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autogenous Particles Harvesting During Implant Surgery
NCT06240416
Effect of Different Drilling Techniques on Primary Stability and Marginal Bone Loss of Extra Short Implants
NCT06234566
Influence of Abutment Shape on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Loss
NCT03888339
Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group B ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT03212820
Standard Implants With Bone Regeneration vs Short Implants
NCT03524885
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All the surgeries were performed by the same experienced operator (JCBM). The interventions were conducted under local anesthesia (4% articaine with 1: 100,000 adrenaline (Inibsa®, Lliça de Vall, Barcelona, Spain). The IPX® implant model (Nueva Galimplant S.L, Sarria, Galicia, Spain) was placed in the present study.
Surgical drills with stop (K Fres Stop ®, Nueva Galimplant S.L, Sarria, Spain) were used to prepare the osteotomies. The drilling sequence used will be: initial lance drill, followed by conical drills of 2.0 mm, 2.6 mm, 3.2 mm and 3.6 mm. The implants were apico-coronally situated at 4 mm to the mucosal margin with a torque of 35 Ncm.
The placed implants were IPX Model (Nueva Galimplant S.L., Sarria, Spain) with a 2-mm height anti-rotational abutment of one piece (Nueva Galimplant S.L, Sarria, Spain). The healing was non-submerged.
As postoperative medication 1 g of paracetamol (Bexistar®, Bacino Laboratory, Barcelona, Spain) on demand maximum every 8 hours were prescribed. Postoperative hygiene and oral care instructions were explained to the patient. A mouthwash of 0.12% chlorhexidine (GUM®, John O. Butler / Sunstar, Chicago, IL, USA) twice daily for two weeks was recommended too. The sutures were removed 7 days after surgery. Prosthetic loading will be performed 10 weeks after implant placement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low speed drilling without irrigation
The dental implants will be placed using a low-speed drilling technique without irrigation for the experimental group.
Dental implant bed preparation
Drilling an osteotomy for placement of a dental implant
High speed drilling with irrigation
The dental implants will be placed using a high-speed drilling technique with irrigation for the control group.
Dental implant bed preparation
Drilling an osteotomy for placement of a dental implant
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental implant bed preparation
Drilling an osteotomy for placement of a dental implant
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Juan Carlos Bernabeu Mira
UNKNOWN
Miguel Peñarrocha Diago
UNKNOWN
University of Valencia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Peñarrocha Oltra
Titular Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Facultad de Medicina y Odontología de la Universitat de València
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bernabeu-Mira JC, Penarrocha-Diago M, Canullo L, Camacho-Alonso F, Rojo-Sanchis J, Penarrocha-Oltra D. Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Changes Using High-Speed Drilling With Irrigation Versus Low-Speed Drilling Without Irrigation: A Randomized Clinical Trial With 12 Months of Follow-Up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jun;36(6):698-709. doi: 10.1111/clr.14416. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1937615
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.