Comparison of Different Drilling Speed to Classify Bone Quality by Tactile Sensation on a Saw Bone Model

NCT ID: NCT03877419

Last Updated: 2020-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-28

Study Completion Date

2020-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of different drilling speed to classify bone quality by tactile sensation on a saw bone model

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bone quality is one of the major factors influencing the dental implant survival rate. Bone quality is believed to have effects on initial implant stability and success of osseointegration. Different implant designs and surgical protocols were developed for improving the survival rate in different bone quality. Although bone quality can be partly diagnosed by radiographic images, lots of experienced surgeons also evaluate bone quality with tactile sensation when they drill the bone. However, variations in evaluation of bone density maybe exist among different surgeons. The drilling speed also may have effect on the outcome of evaluation. For less experienced dentists, it is difficult to diagnose bone quality with tactile sensation in the beginning. The purpose of this study is to find proper drilling speed to classify bone quality by tactile sensation on a saw bone model. Saw bones of variant densities are used as training \& testing materials. The proper drilling speed to distinguish different bone quality will be evaluated and offered to junior dentists for better implant treatment outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Missing Teeth Dental Implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult dentist, with license no more than 5 years
* No clinical implant surgery experience or with experience less than 10 implants.

Exclusion Criteria

-Subject who couldn't hold the test procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

24 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tong-Mei Wang, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NTUH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Test2, Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201901021RINB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.