MedDataX Logo

Immediate Implant vs.Socket Shield Technique in Esthetic Zone

NCT ID: NCT05658419

Last Updated: 2022-12-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-14

Study Completion Date

2022-08-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

immediate implant placement versus socket shield approach

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial; patients were randomly allocated to two groups: the study group: ten dental implants were placed in the maxillary esthetic zone, implants were placed using the socket shield technique with immediate loading; and the control group: ten implants were placed immediately with immediate loading. Preoperative and 6 months postoperative CBCT were performed for both groups to assess the dimensional changes in the labial bone plates. Implant stability quotients (ISQs), pink esthetic scores and attachment loss were measured at the time of implant placement and 6 months postoperatively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Loss

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

socket shield

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Study group (socket shield) vs. Control group (immediate implants)
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Operator Data collector Examiner

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

immediate implant placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

socket sheild

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

the socket shield technique, in which a partial root fragment was retained around an immediately placed implant with the aim of avoiding tissue alterations after tooth extraction. Histologic evaluation in a beagle dog showed no resorption of the root fragment and new cementum formed on the implant surface.

study group

socket shield immediate implant placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

socket sheild

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

the socket shield technique, in which a partial root fragment was retained around an immediately placed implant with the aim of avoiding tissue alterations after tooth extraction. Histologic evaluation in a beagle dog showed no resorption of the root fragment and new cementum formed on the implant surface.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

socket sheild

the socket shield technique, in which a partial root fragment was retained around an immediately placed implant with the aim of avoiding tissue alterations after tooth extraction. Histologic evaluation in a beagle dog showed no resorption of the root fragment and new cementum formed on the implant surface.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

partial extraction therapies

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients of 20-45 years of both sexes. Good oral hygiene Demonstrating non-restorable maxillary anterior single rooted teeth in the esthetic zone with as far diagnosable.

Fairly intact buccal periodontal tissues. Patients' acceptance to sign the informed consent. Labial bone plates less than 1.5 mm in thickness or cases with labial root curvatures.

Intact root with no mobility in the tooth and no sub-gingival caries.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with systemic diseases that would interfere with the normal healing such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

History of radiation therapy to the head and neck. No history of bruxism/ para-functional habits. (119) Teeth with periodontal disease, vertical root fracture, horizontal fracture at or below the bone level, and teeth with local pathologic incidents that affect the labial part of the root as external or internal root resorption were also excluded.

Maxillary 1st and 2nd premolars. Pregnant and lactating females.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mohamed Mohamed Shehata Elsayed

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1103701#

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id