Assessment of Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Instrumented by Single Endodontic Files

NCT ID: NCT05286073

Last Updated: 2022-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

88 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-01

Study Completion Date

2022-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is the assessment of vertical root fracture resistance of roots prepared with three different single endodontic rotary files in extracted human mandibular premolar roots.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

88 human extracted mandibular premolars will be selected. Teeth will be sectioned below cementoenamel junction to get 13mm from the apex of root. Roots will then be standardized according to buccolingual and mesiodistal widths and will be examined for fracture and craze lines. The roots will then be randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and 1 control group (n=22). Group 1 will be instrumented with Hyflex EDM. Group 2 will be instrumented with F6 Sky Taper. Group 3 will be instrumented with One Shape and Group 4 will be negative control group in which no instrumentation will be done. After performing rotary instrumentation, roots will then be obturated with respective GP and sealer. Samples will then be exposed to vertical load utilizing Universal Testing Machine till fracture occur which will be recorded in Newton(N).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vertical Fracture of Root of Tooth (Disorder)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Samples were randomly divided in 4 groups. Random sampling was done with computer generated method. There were 3 working groups comprising of 22 canals and 1 negative control group having 22 canals.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hyflex EDm

The canals were prepared and shaped with one file (25/\~) and finished with 40/.04 using crown down technique. Torque controlled endodontic motor was used with a rotational speed of 500 rpm and torque of 2.5Ncm (25 Nm).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endodontic Root Canal Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).

F6 SkyTaper

The canals were prepared and shaped with one file (25/\~) and finished with 40/.04 using crown down technique. Torque controlled endodontic motor was used with a rotational speed of 500 rpm and torque of 2.5Ncm (25 Nm).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endodontic Root Canal Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).

One Shape

Canals were prepared and shaped with single rotational file system One Shape with the sequence of Endoflare (12, 0.12), One G (18, 0.03) and One Shape (12.06) connected to endodontic motor with rotational speed of 400rpm and 4 Ncm torque as recommended by manufacturer.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endodontic Root Canal Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).

Control

In the control group, no endodontic instrumentation and shaping was done in the canals. Only the necrotic pulp tissue was extirpated from the canals with the help of barbed broaches and then the specimens were analyzed for fracture testing.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endodontic Root Canal Treatment

Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Extracted Human mandibular premolar canals that fulfill the following criteria were used.

* permanent teeth
* intact and fully formed apices
* straight and single rooted canal
* roots having similar diameter mesiodistally(2-4mm) and buccolingually(4-6mm)

Exclusion Criteria

* Roots having following features were excluded;

* root caries
* roots with multiple canals
* previous root canal treatment done
* signs of calcification, internal and external root resorption
* cracks
* fracture lines
* C-shaped canals
* Vertical Root Fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dow University of Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Urooj Musheer

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Farah Naz, BDS,FCPS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dow University of Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dow University of Health Sciences

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pawar AM, Pawar MG, Thakur B, Banga KS, Luke AM. Resistance to fracture of teeth instrumented using novel EndoStar E5 rotary versus ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne file systems. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):52-56. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_216_16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29628648 (View on PubMed)

Pawar AM, Barfiwala D, Pawar M, Metzger Z, Kfir A, Jain N. Assessment of the fracture resistance of teeth instrumented using 2 rotary and 2 reciprocating files versus the Self-Adjusting File (SAF): An ex vivo comparative study on mandibular premolars. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):138-42. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.178692.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27099419 (View on PubMed)

Capar ID, Altunsoy M, Arslan H, Ertas H, Aydinbelge HA. Fracture strength of roots instrumented with self-adjusting file and the ProTaper rotary systems. J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):551-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24666910 (View on PubMed)

Tavanafar S, Karimpour A, Karimpour H, Mohammed Saleh A, Hamed Saeed M. Effect of Different Instrumentation Techniques on Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Mar;16(1 Suppl):50-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26106635 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-1658/DUHS/Approval/2020/

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.