Assessment of Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Instrumented by Single Endodontic Files
NCT ID: NCT05286073
Last Updated: 2022-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-01
2022-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radicular Dentin Remaining, Risk of Perforation and Canal Transportation in Manual Versus Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Molars
NCT04793308
Effectiveness of Cryotherapy on Endodontic Pain
NCT06785753
Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Final Irrigants
NCT03853200
Influence of Maintaining Apical Patency on Post-Endodontic Pain in Molars
NCT07239752
Comparing Different Single and Combination Chelating Agents on Sealer Penetration and Dentin Erosion.
NCT05778227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hyflex EDm
The canals were prepared and shaped with one file (25/\~) and finished with 40/.04 using crown down technique. Torque controlled endodontic motor was used with a rotational speed of 500 rpm and torque of 2.5Ncm (25 Nm).
Endodontic Root Canal Treatment
Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
F6 SkyTaper
The canals were prepared and shaped with one file (25/\~) and finished with 40/.04 using crown down technique. Torque controlled endodontic motor was used with a rotational speed of 500 rpm and torque of 2.5Ncm (25 Nm).
Endodontic Root Canal Treatment
Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
One Shape
Canals were prepared and shaped with single rotational file system One Shape with the sequence of Endoflare (12, 0.12), One G (18, 0.03) and One Shape (12.06) connected to endodontic motor with rotational speed of 400rpm and 4 Ncm torque as recommended by manufacturer.
Endodontic Root Canal Treatment
Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
Control
In the control group, no endodontic instrumentation and shaping was done in the canals. Only the necrotic pulp tissue was extirpated from the canals with the help of barbed broaches and then the specimens were analyzed for fracture testing.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endodontic Root Canal Treatment
Root canal shaping procedures were performed. Irrigation was done after each three pecks of endodontic file. After instrumentation (Groups 1-3), the canals were dried with sterile paper points. The dentinal walls were then coated with Sealapex. For vertical root fracture resistance testing, sample preparation was done in acrylic blocks. Then roots were coated with polyvinylsiloxane impression material. After that roots were inserted again into acrylic resin blocks. The acrylic blocks with the vertically aligned roots were mounted in the Instron testing machine. 0.5 mm diameter round tip stainless-steel rod was fixed to the universal testing machine. The universal testing machine was adjusted and vertical compressive force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The Instron tester applied a slowly increasing force, until the root fractured. The maximum amount of force necessary to fracture every sample was recorded in Newton (N).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* permanent teeth
* intact and fully formed apices
* straight and single rooted canal
* roots having similar diameter mesiodistally(2-4mm) and buccolingually(4-6mm)
Exclusion Criteria
* root caries
* roots with multiple canals
* previous root canal treatment done
* signs of calcification, internal and external root resorption
* cracks
* fracture lines
* C-shaped canals
* Vertical Root Fracture
25 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dow University of Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Urooj Musheer
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Farah Naz, BDS,FCPS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dow University of Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dow University of Health Sciences
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pawar AM, Pawar MG, Thakur B, Banga KS, Luke AM. Resistance to fracture of teeth instrumented using novel EndoStar E5 rotary versus ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne file systems. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):52-56. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_216_16.
Pawar AM, Barfiwala D, Pawar M, Metzger Z, Kfir A, Jain N. Assessment of the fracture resistance of teeth instrumented using 2 rotary and 2 reciprocating files versus the Self-Adjusting File (SAF): An ex vivo comparative study on mandibular premolars. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):138-42. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.178692.
Capar ID, Altunsoy M, Arslan H, Ertas H, Aydinbelge HA. Fracture strength of roots instrumented with self-adjusting file and the ProTaper rotary systems. J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):551-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Tavanafar S, Karimpour A, Karimpour H, Mohammed Saleh A, Hamed Saeed M. Effect of Different Instrumentation Techniques on Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Mar;16(1 Suppl):50-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-1658/DUHS/Approval/2020/
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.