Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20509 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-21
2022-11-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Increasing Engagement With Messages Regarding CRC Screening Among Adults Aged 45-49
NCT05281159
Screen to Save: NCI Colorectal Cancer Outreach & Screening Initiative
NCT05064410
Improving Rates of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Never Screened Patients
NCT01742169
Improving Rates of Repeat Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT01453894
Young Adult-Mediated Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT05936931
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conventional screening options include both invasive (or direct-visualization) and non-invasive (or stool-based) options. Invasive screening tests include flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography, and colonoscopy. Non-invasive screening tests include the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), the high sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood test, and stool DNA testing. All of these screening tests are recommended by the USPSTF for CRC screening.
Nationally (and at UCLA Health), the two most common CRC screening modalities are the colonoscopy and the FIT. UCLA Health has previously implemented a FIT mailer outreach program wherein FIT kits are mailed to average-risk patients overdue for CRC screening twice annually to promote screening uptake. The program has been extremely effective in increasing CRC screening adherence rates, with an increase in the health system's screening rate over the past several years.
The investigators current study aims to determine the most effective patient outreach approach to maximize CRC screening utilization in average-risk individuals ages 45-49 years. In addition, the investigators aim to understand the impact of screening modality choice on uptake of CRC screening, patients' preference for screening modality, and sociodemographic differences in screening utilization among individuals ages 45-49 years.
There are approximately 18,000 patients eligible for inclusion. The investigators will randomly assign approximately 17,000 average-risk patients aged 45-49 to one of four arms. 1,000 of the patients will be reserved for an internal pilot project. In all arms, all patients will receive a text message encouraging them to access their patient communication portal via Epic electronic health record (EHR) (referred to as "MyChart"). In all arms, once a patient visits MyChart, a message on MyChart will state that they are due for CRC screening and the importance of CRC screening. In the control (standard care) arm, patients will treated as part of our "FIT-kit mailer program." These patients will receive a mailed FIT kit, and the message on MyChart will encourage them to complete the FIT kit. In the "FIT Kit Choice" arm, patients will be presented with the choice to complete screening with a FIT kit or opt out of screening. In the "Colonoscopy Choice" arm, patients will be presented with the choice to complete screening with a colonoscopy or opt out of screening. In the "Dual Choice" arm, patients will be presented with the choice to complete screening with a FIT kit, complete screening with a colonoscopy, or opt out of screening. After patients make the choice in MyChart, the patient will be asked why they made that choice.
We will resend the message on MyChart (as a reminder) two weeks after they receive the initial MyChart message. The reminder message content will be very similar to the content of initial MyChart message, and differ by arm.
The investigators have competing predictions based on the literature about whether giving people the option of choosing between two screening modalities (vs. neither) is better than giving people the option of deciding whether to take one modality (vs. not). On the one hand, offering people two modalities should increase flexibility and thus enhance participation; on the other hand, choosing between two modalities could tax mental resources and create choice avoidance, thus decreasing participation. Specifically:
In addition, the investigators have competing predictions based on the literature about whether active choice is better than assigning people a screening modality. On one side, active choice can make patients feel more empowered, thus enhancing participation in screening. On the other side, active choice takes more of patients' cognitive and time resources than following the assigned option, thus decreasing participation in screening.
Analysis Plan:
* Patient-level linear regression models with robust standard errors
* The primary model term will be indicator variables for arms that patients are assigned to.
* Covariates will include age, sex, race/ethnicity, social vulnerability index (ZIP code level), and baseline HM focus measure completion rate
* Treatment effects will be summarized using rate differences and 95% confidence intervals
* Exploratory analyses will investigate heterogeneous treatment effects by splitting the sample into demographic subgroups and by testing for demographic x choice arm interactions
* Sensitivity analyses will be performed without covariates, and using logistic regression models in place of linear regression models
* Missing covariate values will be handled by including 'unknown' indicators, along with mean imputation for quantitative covariates
* To analyze the effect of offering a choice between modalities (vs. single choice), we will compare the single choice arms (arms 1 and 2) with the dual choice arm (arm 3).
* To analyze the effect of active choice, we will compare the control arm (arm 0) with (1) active FIT choice arm (arm 1) and (2) the dual choice arm (arm 3).
* To assess both the effect of offering the dual choice (vs. single choice) and the effect of active choice, we will analyze two samples: (1) patients who open their initial MyChart message within 1 week of the date sent and (2) intention-to-treat regardless of whether patients open the MyChart message. In addition, when assessing the effect of offering the dual choice (vs. single choice), we will also examine patients who open either the initial or the reminder MyChart message within 1 week.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* Patient-level randomization
* Four arms
* Arm 0: Standard of care control
* Arm 1: Active FIT choice
* Arm 2: Active colonoscopy choice
* Arm 3: Active FIT v. colonoscopy choice
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care
No Intervention-"Standard Care"
UCLA Health has a mailed FIT outreach program. This group will receive standard FIT mailer protocol. They will receive a tailored MyChart message indicating the importance of CRC screening and not be presented with a choice for screening modalities.
No interventions assigned to this group
FIT Choice
This group will receive a tailored message via MyChart with information about CRC screening and using the FIT kit for noninvasive screening. They will then have to actively choose if they want CRC screening with a FIT kit vs no screening. If they opt for screening, the investigators will mail them a FIT kit.
Active FIT Choice
The investigators will send randomized participants a message via MyChart indicating the benefits of CRC screening, along with tailored information about FIT as a screening strategy. At the end of the message, participants will complete a survey asking them to indicate if they would like to be screened for CRC with a FIT, or if they prefer no screening whatsoever. The investigators will then ask follow-up questions to better understand the reason patients made their respective choices.
Colonoscopy Choice
This group will receive a tailored message via MyChart with information about CRC screening and colonoscopy for CRC screening. They will then have to actively choose if they want CRC screening with a colonoscopy vs no screening. If they opt for screening, the investigators will direct them to our patient navigators to get scheduled for a colonoscopy.
Active Colonoscopy Choice
The investigators will send randomized participants a message via MyChart indicating the benefits of CRC screening, along with tailored information about colonoscopy as a screening strategy. At the end of the message, participants will complete a survey asking them to indicate if they would like to be screened for CRC with a colonoscopy, or if they prefer no screening whatsoever. The investigators will then ask follow-up questions to better understand the reason patients made their respective choices.
Dual Choice
This group will receive a tailored message via MyChart with information about CRC screening and using either the FIT kit or colonoscopy for CRC screening. They will then have to actively choose if they want CRC screening with a FIT kit, a colonoscopy, or no screening. If they opt for screening, the investigators will either mail them a FIT kit or direct them to our patient navigators to schedule a colonoscopy, depending on their choice.
Active Dual Choice
The investigators will send randomized participants a message via MyChart indicating the benefits of CRC screening, along with tailored information about FIT Kit and Colonoscopy screening. At the end of the message, participants will complete a survey asking them to indicate if they would like to be screened for CRC with either a FIT or Colonoscopy, or if they prefer no screening whatsoever. The investigators will then ask follow-up questions to better understand the reason patients made their respective choices.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active FIT Choice
The investigators will send randomized participants a message via MyChart indicating the benefits of CRC screening, along with tailored information about FIT as a screening strategy. At the end of the message, participants will complete a survey asking them to indicate if they would like to be screened for CRC with a FIT, or if they prefer no screening whatsoever. The investigators will then ask follow-up questions to better understand the reason patients made their respective choices.
Active Colonoscopy Choice
The investigators will send randomized participants a message via MyChart indicating the benefits of CRC screening, along with tailored information about colonoscopy as a screening strategy. At the end of the message, participants will complete a survey asking them to indicate if they would like to be screened for CRC with a colonoscopy, or if they prefer no screening whatsoever. The investigators will then ask follow-up questions to better understand the reason patients made their respective choices.
Active Dual Choice
The investigators will send randomized participants a message via MyChart indicating the benefits of CRC screening, along with tailored information about FIT Kit and Colonoscopy screening. At the end of the message, participants will complete a survey asking them to indicate if they would like to be screened for CRC with either a FIT or Colonoscopy, or if they prefer no screening whatsoever. The investigators will then ask follow-up questions to better understand the reason patients made their respective choices.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 45-49 (as of 1/1/2022)
* Active primary care provider at UCLA Health
* Visit within the last 3 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Documented family history of CRC in EMR
* History (personal or family) of prior adenomatous polyps in the EHR
* History of high-risk cancer syndromes (e.g., Lynch, FAP)
* Prior CRC screening with colonoscopy or FIT
* Inactive MyChart status at enrollment
* No documented SMS-capable phone number
45 Years
49 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UCLA Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases
UNKNOWN
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel M. Croymans, MD, MBA, MS
Medical Director, DOM Quality
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCLA Health Department of Medicine, Quality Office
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases
Westwood, Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Galoosian A, Dai H, Croymans D, Saccardo S, Fox CR, Goshgarian G, De Silva S, Han MA, Vangala S, May FP. Population Health Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Adults Aged 45 to 49 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Sep 2;334(9):778-787. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.12049.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRC45
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.