Lidocaine Infusion for Propofol Dose Reduction in ERCP Procedure

NCT ID: NCT05274984

Last Updated: 2022-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-03

Study Completion Date

2022-04-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to investigate the dose reduction of propofol if associated with continuous infusion of lidocaine during ERCP procedures in patients over 65 years old.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of continuous infusion of lidocaine on propofol consumption in older patients having ERCP sedation. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate patient adverse events, sedation quality and satisfaction of the patient and the endoscopist, postprocedural pain, and sedation-related time.For this the investigators randomised patients into 2 groups: Group Lidocaine received 1,5 mg/kg lidocaine 1% 10 min before procedure and then 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion of lidocaine 1%, whereas the Group Control received an equal volume of saline solution, which could not be visually identified from lidocaine by the blinded anaesthesiologist. All patients received propofol bolus dose of 1mg/kg than 10-20 mg iv boluses during the procedure guided by capnograph monitoring and the patient's grimace, mobility, hemodynamic changes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sedation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are randomly assigned to controll group or lidocaine group. Participants of control group are given placebo while participants of lidocaine group are given lidocaine.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
Patients, endoscopist, anesthetist, and data collection observers were all blinded to the group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group Placebo

the control group will be given the same volume of saline as the experimental group

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

the control group will be given the same volume of saline.

Group Lidocaine

the experimental group will be given l-1.5mg lidocaine and then 2mg/kg/h

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

the experimental group will be given 1.5mg/kg lidocaine and then 2mg/kg/h

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

the control group will be given the same volume of saline.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine

the experimental group will be given 1.5mg/kg lidocaine and then 2mg/kg/h

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 65-85 years old
* physical status ASA I, II, III,
* ERCP scheduled

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA IV or higher
* severe renal, cardiac or liver failure,
* allergy to lidocaine,
* patients weighing less than 40 kg,
* inability to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Breazu Caius Mihai

Assistant Professor MD PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniela Ionescu, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

UMF Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj-Napoca

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof.dr.Octavian Fodor"

Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Romania

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Caius Breazu, MD PHD

Role: CONTACT

0040743010012

Alex Alexandru, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Caius M Breazu, MD

Role: primary

0040743010012

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LIP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Postoperative ICC Analgesia
NCT04939545 COMPLETED PHASE3