Comparison of Two Techniques of IV Lidocaine on Propofol Injection Pain

NCT ID: NCT03057704

Last Updated: 2018-09-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-05

Study Completion Date

2017-01-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Intravenous lidocaine is commonly given through an intravenous (IV) line prior to injection of propofol to reduce the amount of pain during propofol injection. The investigators want to study if giving the lidocaine through the IV while the forearm on the same limb has a tourniquet applied to it to prevent "washing out" of the lidocaine prior to propofol injection helps reduce propofol injection pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators expect that tourniquet lidocaine is superior to straight non-tourniquet lidocaine in reducing propofol injection pain. The investigators also wanted to determine the association of tourniquet duration on reduction of pain with propofol administration. Small studies indicate that 60 seconds of tourniquet lidocaine is superior to 30 seconds or less of tourniquet duration or mixed lidocaine/propofol for injection. The investigators suspect many clinicians do not use the 60-second tourniquet technique due to the extra time involved but hypothesize that a more practical application by applying the tourniquet as soon as the patient is positioned on the operating table will not only be more widely adopted by clinicians as it does not cause delay but also provide the necessary amount of time for benefit from the tourniquet. The investigators also wanted to record the time from tourniquet application to start of propofol administration, which the investigators predict would be at least 60 seconds to see if there is a correlation between duration of venous stasis of IV lidocaine and pain benefit.

Methods and Measures

Design This was conducted as a randomized controlled trial of two methods of administering lidocaine prior to propofol injection.

Setting The study setting was located within North Carolina Baptist Health, an academic medical center, in the Endoscopy Suite or Outpatient Surgery Center where subjects were scheduled to receive propofol as part of their sedation or anesthetic.

Sample Size The investigators estimated that 25 subjects in each of the two groups was required to test the hypothesis based on prior studies.

Interventions and Interactions

The investigators used two groups:

* Group 1: 50mg of 2% lidocaine given just prior to the propofol dose through the IV line.
* Group 2: 50mg of 2% lidocaine given IV with venous occlusion applied when the patient is positioned on the operating room table and timed until the onset of propofol administration. The tourniquet the investigators used was a Quick Release tourniquet applied to the forearm 10cm distal to the elbow joint in the tourniquet group. Venous stasis was confirmed with cessation of flow from hanging IV fluid.

For both groups, no premedication was given, which is the normal practice for these procedures. Study procedures involved placing a 20 gauge intravenous (IV) catheter in a vein distal to the mid forearm. Venous occlusion was achieved by either a latex free tourniquet or McKesson Quick Release tourniquet applied to the forearm 10cm distal to the elbow joint. Tourniquet pressure was somewhat variable but sufficient to cause venous stasis as confirmed by no flow of hanging IV fluid. Injections were delivered at roughly 1 ml/sec.

Schedule of events in the study (all performed by 1 of the 2 investigators:

* Day of procedure: holding area

* Consent subject for study participation
* Randomly assign patient to one of two groups
* Day of procedure: procedure area

-Accompany subject to the operating or procedure room, perform protocol from the group to which the subjects were assigned, while noting outcome measures such as self-described discomfort and observer graded discomfort
* Day of procedure: recovery area

-Revisit subject in recovery 30 minutes after their procedure to determine post-procedure recall of discomfort
* Post-study period
* Analyze data

Analytical Plan The investigators will analyze results initially using descriptive statistics. Comparison between groups was done using chi square tests for proportions, and t-tests or ANOVA procedures for continuous variables. Regression analysis was performed to identify independent outcome predictors. Other inferential statistical analysis was conducted as appropriate.

Informed Consent One of the two investigators obtained signed informed consent from each subject. This was performed in the holding room prior to the procedure since most subjects had their pre-procedure examination performed in the holding room and were not seen prior to the day of their procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Injections, Intravenous

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomized, controlled trial of two methods of administering lidocaine prior to propofol injection
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The participant is not told which group they are randomized to. However, a tourniquet is applied in the experimental group, thus some subjects may reason that they are in the experimental group. The study coordinator is aware which group the subject is in.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intravenous lidocaine: flushed

Lidocaine injection flushed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine injection flushed

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigator administers IV lidocaine and flushes it into the subject prior to administering propofol.

Intravenous lidocaine: tourniquet

Lidocaine injection tourniquet

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine injection tourniquet

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous lidocaine: tourniquet

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine injection flushed

The investigator administers IV lidocaine and flushes it into the subject prior to administering propofol.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine injection tourniquet

Intravenous lidocaine: tourniquet

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Xylocaine Xylocaine Tourniquet

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any subject at North Carolina Baptist Hospital scheduled for a procedure in which they will receive propofol for sedation or anesthesia and will not be receiving any other medications prior to the propofol injection.
* Cases must be schedule to have a duration less than 60 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects are excluded if they cannot verbalize a rating of pain
* Subjects are excluded if they require intravenous medications prior to the study period
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Timothy N Harwood, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Patrick Grace, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North Carolina Baptist Hospital

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00040756

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine in Liver Surgery
NCT05153785 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3