CAPITAL DOREMI 2: Inotrope Versus Placebo Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock
NCT ID: NCT05267886
Last Updated: 2025-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
346 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-05
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Norepinephrine vs Norepinephrine and Dobutamine in Cardiogenic Shock
NCT03340779
Dopamine and Norepinephrine in Shock Patients
NCT00314704
Physiologic Effect of Topical Nitroglycerin on Microcirculation Capacity in Patients With Circulatory Shock.
NCT05102734
Effect of Midodrine vs Abdominal Compression on Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Autonomic Failure Patients
NCT04620382
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Transradial Catheterization With or Without Spasmolytic Drugs
NCT02343276
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is a signal of harm associated with the use of inotropes in both acute, decompensated heart failure and in the longitudinal management of chronic heart failure. Inotrope use has also been associated with longer ICU and in-hospital length of stay, as well as higher in-hospital mortality. A recent network meta-analysis on treatment strategies in CS and found that while milrinone and dobutamine may reduce the risk of mortality compared to placebo, the evidence is of low certainty and the wide confidence intervals do not rule out the possibility of harm.
Despite their frequent use in the management of patients with CS, it remains unknown if inotropes are needed to augment successful initial resuscitation, reduce morbidity and mortality, or if they cause potential harm in this already critically ill patient population.
This study is a multi-centre, double blind, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the efficacy and safety of inotrope therapy against placebo in the initial resuscitation of SCAI class C to D cardiogenic shock. Consecutive patients admitted to an intensive care unit will be identified by the treating medical team as requiring new initiation of inotrope therapy for CS. All decisions to initiate inotrope therapy will be made by the primary care team with no involvement from the research team. The study hypothesis is that inotrope therapy will lead to an overall improvement in the primary outcome as compared to placebo.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Inotrope
Participants randomized to receive the inotrope will be initiated on inotrope therapy at starting doses and titrated according to standard clinical care. During reassessment, the treating physicians will make a decision about adjustment of the inotrope dose (increase, maintain or decrease) based on hemodynamics, end-organ perfusion, vasopressor support and clinical exam. Dobutamine doses will be 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10 and \>10 ug/kg/min and milrinone doses will be 0.125, 0.250, 0.375, 0.5 and \>0.5 ug/kg/min. These dose stages are identical to those used in Capital Do-Re-Mi and reflect current standard of care.
Dobutamine
Dobutamine administered according to its clinical dose stage for cardiogenic shock
Milrinone
Milrinone administered according to its clinical dose stage for cardiogenic shock
Placebo
Participants in the placebo arm will have an intravenous solution of 0.9% NaCl running at a standardized rate, comparable to the infusion rate of the inotrope arm.
Normal Saline
Normal saline running at a standardized rate
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dobutamine
Dobutamine administered according to its clinical dose stage for cardiogenic shock
Milrinone
Milrinone administered according to its clinical dose stage for cardiogenic shock
Normal Saline
Normal saline running at a standardized rate
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* SCAI class C or D cardiogenic shock
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are currently pregnant or breast-feeding
* Patients presenting with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
* Administration of milrinone or dobutamine in the 24 hours preceding anticipated randomization
* Severe obstructive valvular lesions, including aortic stenosis and/or mitral stenosis
* Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca Mathew, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Emilie Belley-Cote, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20210386
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.