Liberal Versus Restrictive Use of Dobutamine in Cardiac Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02361801
Last Updated: 2022-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-28
2018-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Recent data show that inotropic agents are used in 35-52% of cardiac surgeries in the perioperative period. However, the use of inotropic agents may be associated with adverse events, including myocardial ischemia, by elevation in myocardial oxygen consumption and the imbalance between supply and consumption, and tachyarrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, ventricular tachyarrhythmias), primarily due to the β1-adrenergic effect.
This study is a non-inferiority clinical randomized study aiming to compare the use of dobutamine in a liberal strategy (in all patients at the time of withdrawal of CPB) with a restrictive strategy (based on clinical and hemodynamic evidence of low cardiac output syndrome associated with altered tissue perfusion). Our primary hypothesis is that the restrictive use of dobutamine is as safe and effective as the liberal one.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Norepinephrine vs Norepinephrine and Dobutamine in Cardiogenic Shock
NCT03340779
CAPITAL DOREMI 2: Inotrope Versus Placebo Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock
NCT05267886
Influence of Inotropic Choice on Morbidity and Mortality in Complex Pediatric Heart Surgery
NCT04380181
The Influence of Beta Blocker Therapy on the Hemodynamic Response to Inotrope Infusion in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
NCT01971944
Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Epinephrine and Norepinephrine in Cardiogenic Shock
NCT01367743
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Liberal dobutamine group
All patients will receive dobutamine at the cardiopulmonary bypass weaning
Liberal dobutamine protocol
All patients will receive dobutamine at the cardiopulmonary bypass weaning.
Restrictive dobutamine group
Patients will only receive dobutamine if they present clinical signs of cardiogenic shock
Restrictive dobutamine protocol
Patients will receive dobutamine during the first 8 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass weaning only if they have a cardiac index of ≤ 2.5L/min/m2 and at least one sign of tissue hypoperfusion: ScvO2 ≤ 70% and / or urine output \< 2 mL/Kg/h despite adequate fluid replacement.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Liberal dobutamine protocol
All patients will receive dobutamine at the cardiopulmonary bypass weaning.
Restrictive dobutamine protocol
Patients will receive dobutamine during the first 8 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass weaning only if they have a cardiac index of ≤ 2.5L/min/m2 and at least one sign of tissue hypoperfusion: ScvO2 ≤ 70% and / or urine output \< 2 mL/Kg/h despite adequate fluid replacement.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age equal or greater than 18 years;
* Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Sustained supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias;
* Cardiogenic shock or need for inotropes before surgery;
* Immediate need of ventricular assist device or intraaortic balloon after CPB;
* Combined procedure;
* Pregnancy;
* Participation in another study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar MD, PhD
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Heart Institute
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Franco RA, de Almeida JP, Landoni G, Scheeren TWL, Galas FRBG, Fukushima JT, Zefferino S, Nardelli P, de Albuquerque Piccioni M, Arita ECTC, Park CHL, Cunha LCC, de Oliveira GQ, Costa IBSDS, Kalil Filho R, Jatene FB, Hajjar LA. Dobutamine-sparing versus dobutamine-to-all strategy in cardiac surgery: a randomized noninferiority trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00808-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DOBUTACS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.