Spinal Anesthesia Using Ultrasound Assistance Versus Conventional Palpation in Morbidly Obese Patients

NCT ID: NCT05240846

Last Updated: 2023-09-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-23

Study Completion Date

2023-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia using ultrasound assistance (USAS) versus conventional palpation in morbidly obese patients undergoing elective surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Performing spinal anesthesia using a conventional approach can be considerably challenging in obese patients. Multiple needle attempts may lead to a higher incidence of complications (e.g., postdural puncture headache, paresthesia, hematoma, and infection) and increase patient discomfort and dissatisfaction. Therefore, novel techniques are needed to improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia for such patients.

There are two puncture approaches for spinal anesthesia: median approach puncture and paramedian approach puncture. Early studies have noted that the success rate of paramedian approach puncture was higher than that of median approach puncture and that it is associated with fewer complications and postoperative complications.

A paramedian approach has been shown to improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia, especially in patients who are unable to sit up or those with a degenerative spine condition. The use of ultrasound has been suggested to increase the efficacy of spinal anesthesia.

Recently, ultrasound has emerged as a way to facilitate lumbar neuraxial blocks, namely, the ultrasound assistance (USAS) technique. The ultrasound assistance technique is beneficial for lumbar neuraxial anesthesia, improving technique performance by providing reliable anatomical information.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Anesthesia Ultrasound Assistance Obesity, Morbid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paramedian conventional palpation group

Patients in this group underwent conventional landmark guided paramedian spinal anesthetic. The spinal anesthesia will be administered based on conventional landmark-based paramedian approach.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paramedian conventional palpation group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in this group underwent conventional landmark guided paramedian spinal anesthetic. The spinal anesthesia will be administered based on conventional landmark-based paramedian approach.

Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal group

This group will have their spinal anesthetic done based on Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This group will have their spinal anesthetic done based on ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal. Spinal anesthesia with a paramedian approach was performed based on the optimum puncture point, suggested puncture angles, and puncture depth. The suggested puncture angles included the cephalad angle measured by the built-in angle program of the ultrasound and the medial angle measured by a 180° protractor (Deli). The puncture depth, the distance from the skin to the posterior complex, was measured utilizing the ultrasound clipper tool.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paramedian conventional palpation group

Patients in this group underwent conventional landmark guided paramedian spinal anesthetic. The spinal anesthesia will be administered based on conventional landmark-based paramedian approach.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal group

This group will have their spinal anesthetic done based on ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal. Spinal anesthesia with a paramedian approach was performed based on the optimum puncture point, suggested puncture angles, and puncture depth. The suggested puncture angles included the cephalad angle measured by the built-in angle program of the ultrasound and the medial angle measured by a 180° protractor (Deli). The puncture depth, the distance from the skin to the posterior complex, was measured utilizing the ultrasound clipper tool.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Both sexes
* Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2
* Patients undergoing elective surgeries

Exclusion Criteria

* Rejection of spinal anesthesia
* History of spinal deformity or spinal surgery
* Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (infection of the puncture site, coagulation dysfunction, allergy to local anesthesia, insufficient blood volume or abnormal spinal anatomy).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kafrelsheikh University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Fouad Algyar

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kafr El-Sheikh University Hospitals

Kafr ash Shaykh, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohammad Algyar, MD

Role: CONTACT

0111645345 ext. +2

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohammad Algyar, MSc.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MKSU 48-1-31

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.