Spinal Anesthesia Using Ultrasound Assistance Versus Conventional Palpation in Morbidly Obese Patients
NCT ID: NCT05240846
Last Updated: 2023-09-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-23
2023-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Modified Thoracoabdominal Block for Analgesia in Obese Patients
NCT06841783
Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Landmark, Ultrasound-Assisted, and Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia for Obese Patients
NCT06191445
Bilateral Thorathic Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Bariatic Surgeries
NCT06812364
Effect of Sedation After Ultrasound-Guided Spinal Anesthesia on Back Pain
NCT07198412
Erectae Spinae Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesis in Lumbar Surgeries
NCT05123092
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are two puncture approaches for spinal anesthesia: median approach puncture and paramedian approach puncture. Early studies have noted that the success rate of paramedian approach puncture was higher than that of median approach puncture and that it is associated with fewer complications and postoperative complications.
A paramedian approach has been shown to improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia, especially in patients who are unable to sit up or those with a degenerative spine condition. The use of ultrasound has been suggested to increase the efficacy of spinal anesthesia.
Recently, ultrasound has emerged as a way to facilitate lumbar neuraxial blocks, namely, the ultrasound assistance (USAS) technique. The ultrasound assistance technique is beneficial for lumbar neuraxial anesthesia, improving technique performance by providing reliable anatomical information.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Paramedian conventional palpation group
Patients in this group underwent conventional landmark guided paramedian spinal anesthetic. The spinal anesthesia will be administered based on conventional landmark-based paramedian approach.
Paramedian conventional palpation group
Patients in this group underwent conventional landmark guided paramedian spinal anesthetic. The spinal anesthesia will be administered based on conventional landmark-based paramedian approach.
Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal group
This group will have their spinal anesthetic done based on Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal.
Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal group
This group will have their spinal anesthetic done based on ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal. Spinal anesthesia with a paramedian approach was performed based on the optimum puncture point, suggested puncture angles, and puncture depth. The suggested puncture angles included the cephalad angle measured by the built-in angle program of the ultrasound and the medial angle measured by a 180° protractor (Deli). The puncture depth, the distance from the skin to the posterior complex, was measured utilizing the ultrasound clipper tool.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Paramedian conventional palpation group
Patients in this group underwent conventional landmark guided paramedian spinal anesthetic. The spinal anesthesia will be administered based on conventional landmark-based paramedian approach.
Ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal group
This group will have their spinal anesthetic done based on ultrasound assistance paramedian spinal. Spinal anesthesia with a paramedian approach was performed based on the optimum puncture point, suggested puncture angles, and puncture depth. The suggested puncture angles included the cephalad angle measured by the built-in angle program of the ultrasound and the medial angle measured by a 180° protractor (Deli). The puncture depth, the distance from the skin to the posterior complex, was measured utilizing the ultrasound clipper tool.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both sexes
* Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2
* Patients undergoing elective surgeries
Exclusion Criteria
* History of spinal deformity or spinal surgery
* Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (infection of the puncture site, coagulation dysfunction, allergy to local anesthesia, insufficient blood volume or abnormal spinal anatomy).
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kafrelsheikh University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Fouad Algyar
Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kafr El-Sheikh University Hospitals
Kafr ash Shaykh, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MKSU 48-1-31
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.