Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Opioid Based General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03798522

Last Updated: 2020-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-01

Study Completion Date

2019-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

bilateral continuous erector spinae plane blockade may represent a valuable alternatives to thoracіc epidurals analgaesіa in treatment of thoracic neuropathic pain.

There were 3 cases reported in 2017 suggested that the erector spinae plane block provides visceral abdominal analgesia in bariatric surgery and at end of the report they recommended further clinical investigation. The investigators hypothesіzed that performing the erector spinae plane (ESP) block at T7 would provide effective abdominal analgaesіa іn patients undergone laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The investigators aimed to compare the analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block and opioid based general anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators hypothesized that, erector spinae plane block will provide good analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with less complication compared to opioid based general anesthesia. The visual analogue scale (VAS) will be explained clearly to all participants before conduction of anesthesia. All the drugs will be calculated according to the ideal body weight (IBW).A low-frequency (2-5 MHz) curved array ultrasound probe (Mindray®, China) will be used. In the 1st group: bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block will be performed under complete aseptic conditions in the lateral position at T7 vertebrae and before induction of general anesthesia. An 8-cm echogenic 22-G block needle will be inserted in-plane. A total of 20 ml of local anesthetic solution (20 ml bupivacaine (Sunnypivacaine, Sunny pharmaceutical, Egypt) 0.25%) will then be injected into the erector spinae plane. This procedure will be repeated on the contralateral side taking care not to exceed the maximum recommended doses (2 mg/kg of IBW for bupivacaine). In the 2nd group: the investigator will give intravenous nalbuphine in a dose of 2mg /kg according to ideal body weight after induction of general anesthesia. All participants will be given 1 gram of intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/Kg), together with 4 mg ondansetron 10 min prior to the end of surgery for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.

Intraoperatively, any increase in heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure 10 min after intubation by more than 20% of baseline values in response to surgical stimulus or thereafter throughout the whole operation will be managed by intravenous administration of fentanyl 0.5 µg/Kg. VAS score will be assessed 30 min after extubation and when the VAS score exceeded 4/10, rescue analgesia in the form of IV nalbuphine 5 mg will be administered. Another dose of rescue analgesia can be given in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) if the VAS still more than 4 after 60 min of extubation. If still high, Ketorolac 60 mg will be given by intravenous infusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bariatric Surgery Candidate Morbid Obesity Visceral Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* erector spinae plane block group (ESPB)
* general anesthesia group (GA)
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

erector spinae plane block group (ESPB) n=14

Bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block will be performed in the lateral position at T7 vertebrae and before induction of GA. 20 ml of local anesthetic solution (20 ml bupivacaine (Sunnypivacaine, Sunny pharmaceutical, Egypt) 0.25%) will be injected in-plane into the ESP. This procedure will be repeated on the other side taking care not to exceed the maximum recommended doses (2 mg/kg of IBW for bupivacaine) and then GA will be conducted .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESPB on both sides at T7 before GA

general anesthesia group (GA) n= 14

these patients will receive iv nalbuphine in dose of 2mg /kg according to ideal body weight after induction of GA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nalbuphine

Intervention Type DRUG

in nalbuphine for analgesia after GA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block

ESPB on both sides at T7 before GA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nalbuphine

in nalbuphine for analgesia after GA

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ESPB GA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient age \>18 \<60
* Obese patients 40˂ Body mass index(BMI) ˂50
* Both sexes
* American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classes II and III
* Patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery i.e. sleeve gastrectomy and/or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)surgeries

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of regional block
* Patients with neurological, psychological disorders or those lacking cooperation
* Patients scheduled for concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy or paraumbilical hernia repair or those with history of previous bariatric surgery or obstructive sleep apnea
* Patients with anatomic abnormalities at site of injection, skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.
* Patients with bleeding disorders defined as (INR \>2) and/ or (platelet count \<100,000/µL)
* Patients with hepatic disease e.g. liver cell failure or hepatic malignancy or hepatic enlargement.
* Patients who are allergic to amide local anesthetics.
* Cases converted to open surgery will also be excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hany Mohammed El-Hadi Shoukat Mohammed

lecturer of anesthesia, pain management and surgical ICU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hany Mohammed El-Hadi Shoukat Mohammed

Giza, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N-42-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.