Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Morphine When Switching From Oral to Parenteral Route in Palliative Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT05236647
Last Updated: 2025-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-08
2025-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients admitted to a Hospital palliative medicine unit with an indication for parenteral administration of morphine will be recruited.
The patients will have two similar infusion pumps with continuous infusion and bolus function. One infusion pump will be connected to an intravenous line, the other to a subcutaneous line. One pump contains morphine, one placebo. The primary endpoint is the time from initiation of infusion with titration to the final infusion rate that provides pain control is reached.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IV PCA With or Without Continuous Dose vs Oral Opioid to Maintain Analgesia for Severe Cancer Pain After Successful Titration
NCT04785768
Inhaled Morphine Compared With Morphine By Mouth in Treating Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain
NCT00020618
Intravenous vs Oral Analgesia in Cancer Patients With Severe Pain After Successful Titration
NCT04243954
Opioid Titration With 12.5 ug/h Fentanyl Transdermal Patch vs Orally Morphine for Opioid-naïve Patients With Moderate Cancer Pain
NCT04533243
Diamorphine or Alfentanil for Subcutaneous Use in Hospice In-patients?
NCT01049672
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators aim to establish whether the intravenous or the subcutaneous route of administration has clinically significant advantages when parenteral administration of morphine is started with a combination of continuous infusion and bolus doses in palliative cancer patients.
Patients admitted to a Hospital palliative medicine unit with an indication for parenteral administration of morphine will be recruited.
The patients will have two similar infusion pumps with continuous infusion and bolus function. One infusion pump will be connected to an intravenous line, the other to a subcutaneous line. One pump contains morphine, one placebo. The primary endpoint is the time from initiation of infusion with titration to the final infusion rate that provides pain control is reached. Secondary endpoints are time from bolus administration to pain relief, comparison of Tmax, Cmax, and size of AUC0-60 after bolus doses, the number of bolus doses first 24 and 48 hours, and the number of patients reaching acceptable pain relief within 48 hours.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intravenous morphine infusion
Morphine 10 mg/ml or morphine 20 mg/ml will be diluted with normal saline to 5 mg/ml or 10 mg/ml. Both active study medication and placebo will be prepared in 100 ml drug containers suitable for the infusion pump.
The patient will have two similar infusion pumps. Morphine infusion connected to an i.v. line, placebo (normal saline) connected to a s.c line. Bolus dose will initially be equal to dose/hour. The nurse will administer bolus doses on both pumps (placebo and morphine pump) simultaneously. Patient reported pain intensity (NRS 0-10) and whether the bolus dose was initiated by the patient or the nurse will be recorded before each bolus dose. Bolus dose will be equally increased if/when the infusion rate is increased. If the bolus dose is ineffective, the bolus dose can be increased in steps of 0.1 ml until an effective dose is reached.
Morphine
Intravenous morphine infusion compared to subcutaneous morphine infusion
Subcutaneous morphine infusion
Morphine 10mg/ml or morphine 20 mg/ml will be diluted with normal saline to 5 mg/ml or 10 mg/ml. Both active study medication and placebo will be prepared in 100 ml drug containers suitable for the infusion pump.
The patient will have two similar infusion pumps. Morphine infusion connected to a s.c. line, placebo (normal saline) connected to a i.v. line. Bolus dose will initially be equal to dose/hour. The nurse will administer bolus doses on both pumps (placebo and morphine pump) simultaneously. Patient reported pain intensity (NRS 0-10) and whether the bolus dose was initiated by the patient or the nurse will be recorded before each bolus dose. Bolus dose will be equally increased if/when the infusion rate is increased. If the bolus dose is ineffective, the bolus dose can be increased in steps of 0.1 ml until an effective dose is reached.
Morphine
Intravenous morphine infusion compared to subcutaneous morphine infusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Morphine
Intravenous morphine infusion compared to subcutaneous morphine infusion
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Planned discharge to home or nursing home
Exclusion Criteria
* A clear indication for either intravenous or subcutaneous administration
* Patient unable to report patient reported outcomes needed in the study due to language barriers or cognitive impairment
* Impossible to establish venous access
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Akershus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Olav Fredheim
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olav Fredheim, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Akershus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akershus University Hospital
Lørenskog, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021/291056(REK)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.