A Comparison of Three Regimens of Acute Pain Management: Methoxyflurane; Intranasal Fentanyl; Intravenous Morphine
NCT ID: NCT05137184
Last Updated: 2023-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
338 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-12
2023-04-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients 18 years or older with acute pain with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4 with normal physiology and capable of giving informed consent will be included null hypothesis (H0) (tested in hierarchic order a-b-c):
1. Methoxyflurane regimen is inferior to intranasal fentanyl regimen or
2. Methoxyflurane regimen is inferior to IV morphine regimen or
3. Intranasal fentanyl regimen is inferior to IV morphine regimen for treating moderate to severe pain, measured by reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 10 minutes after administration.
The study duration for each participant will be from ambulance scene arrival to patient handover in emergency department.
Number of participants: Patient enrolment until successful inclusion of 270 per protocol patients.
Primary endpoint is change in NRS from before administration (t0) to 10 minutes after start of administration (t10).
The study intervention is one of the three IMPs:
* Methoxyflurane: 3 ml inhalation, can be repeated once to a total dose of 6 ml.
* Fentanyl intranasal spray: 100 µg IntraNasal, (patients \>70 years 50 µg), can be repeated to maximum total dose 500 µg IN.
* Morphine hydrochloride intravenous: 0.1 mg/kg IV (patients \>70 years or fragile 0.05 mg/kg IV), can be repeated to a maximum total dose 0.5 mg/kg IV.
Rescue analgesia is all analgesics other than the allocated IMP. If rescue medication is administered before the assessment of primary endpoint at 10 minutes, the patient will not be part of the per-protocol analysis.
The hypothesis will be tested and the primary endpoint will be evaluated by the 95% confidence limits (95% CI), and a conclusion of non-inferiority will be made if the 95% CI of the estimated treatment difference fully lie within the inferiority margin. Non-inferiority is determined on the basis of a 1-sided equivalence t test on the per protocol population and confirmed, for sensitivity reasons, on the modified intention to treat population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Determination of Analgesic Equipotent Doses of Inhaled Metoxyflurane vs. Intravenous Fentanyl
NCT03894800
Prehospital Analgesia in Adults Using Inhaled Methoxyflurane Study
NCT06392087
Inhaled vs IV Opioid Dosing for the Initial Treatment of Severe Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
NCT03257319
A Non-randomised, Non-inferiority Comparative Study of Oral Actiskenan (Morphine Sulfate) Versus Intranasal Sufentanil in the Early Management of Severe Acute Pain in Emergency Departments.
NCT07344350
Prehospital Analgesia in Adults Using Inhaled Methoxyflurane : A Feasibility Study
NCT04287803
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Methoxyflurane
3 ml inhalation Can be repeated once (3 ml) Maximum total dose of 6 ml
Methoxyflurane
Inhalation of Methoxyflurane
Fentanyl IN
100 µg IntraNasal, Patients \>70 years: 50 µg IN Can be repeated Maximum total dose 500 µg IN
Fentanyl
Intranasal Fentanyl
Morphine IV
0.1 mg/kg Intravenous (IV) Patients ≥ 70 years or fragile: 0.05 mg/kg IV Can be repeated Maximum total dose 0.5 mg/kg IV
Morphine hydrochloride
Intravenous Morphine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Methoxyflurane
Inhalation of Methoxyflurane
Fentanyl
Intranasal Fentanyl
Morphine hydrochloride
Intravenous Morphine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Acute moderate to severe pain defined by self-reporting pain ≥4 on NRS
3. Capable of giving informed consent
4. Normal physiology
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
3. Know allergies, hypersensitivity or serious side effects to opioids or methoxyflurane or other excipients
4. Head injury or medical conditions with neurological impairment (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)\<14)
5. Previous malignant hyperthermia or persons with suspect genetic predisposition for malignant hyperthermia
6. Massive facial trauma, visible nasal blockage or on-going nose bleeding
7. History of severe liver disease with jaundice and scleral icterus
8. Dialysis or history of severe renal disease (known chronic kidney failure stage 4 or 5)
9. Mono Amine Oxidase-inhibitors last 14 days (pharmacological treatment of depression, Mb Parkinson or narcolepsy)
10. Myasthenia gravis
11. Use of investigational medicinal product (IMP) analgesics 12 hours prior to inclusion
12. Any condition that in the view of the study worker would suggest that the patient is unable to comply with study protocol and procedures.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
OTHER
Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation
OTHER
University of Oslo
OTHER
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fridtjof Heyerdahl
Senior Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fridtjof Heyerdahl, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Senior Consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sykehuset Innlandet
Gjøvik, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-000549-42
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
255159
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.