Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE1
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-26
2026-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
First Evaluation of Morphine Hydrochloride by Nebulisation in Healthy Volunteers
NCT01975753
Intranasal Fentanyl for Pain Management
NCT00882960
Safety of Intranasal Fentanyl (PecFent®) in the Treatment of Procedural Pain in the Elderly
NCT02298582
Is There an Ideal Dose of Intravenous Fentanyl in the Prehospital Setting
NCT02914678
Inhaled vs IV Opioid Dosing for the Initial Treatment of Severe Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
NCT03257319
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Facial nebulization of opiates presents an alternative method for analgesic administration. Traditional pneumatic nebulizers, readily available in emergency settings, are economical aerosol generators. However, they pose challenges related to the reproducibility of administration and the potential for infectious contamination due to the dispersion of nebulized particles in the air between inhalations. Palladium vibrating screen aerosols, designed to produce optimal particle sizes for drug delivery to the lungs, show promise due to their more occlusive system, offering enhanced performance. Yet, these devices lack evaluation in the realm of opioids, particularly in terms of objective nociception measurement.
Pupillometry, specifically PUAL (pupillary unrest in ambient light), stands out as an objective technique capable of quantifying nociception or opioid impregnation. PUAL monitors variations in pupil diameter over time, and previous studies have indicated an inverse correlation between the analgesic response to opioid treatment and PUAL amplitude, suggesting it could serve as a marker of central opioid impregnation. However, scientific evidence in alert emergency medicine patients remains lacking. Additionally, standard clinical pharmacodynamic evaluation criteria for opioids are not well-suited to the variability of therapeutic responses in emergency situations.
Pharmacometric models offer a quantitative approach to understanding relationships between administered drugs, clinico-biological covariates, exposure, and responses (biomarkers, efficacy, safety) as they evolve over time in individual patients and populations. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, effects, and robustness of nebulized fentanyl administration via facial aerosol or intranasal routes in a population of adult healthy volunteers, employing equivalent analgesic doses. PUAL will serve as an objective pharmacodynamic marker of central opioid impregnation, coupled with pharmacokinetic modeling of nebulized fentanyl administered via facial aerosol or intranasally. The development of a pharmacometric model using a population-based approach aims to establish fentanyl titration strategies based on the objective of reducing PUAL while ensuring central opioid impregnation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Facial Nebulization
Fentanyl's facial nebulization in healthy volunteers.
Fentanyl - Inhalation by facial nebulization
3 administrations based on a weight-dependent threshold (40 µg per administration for a weight \< 70kg and 50 µg per administration for a weight ≥ 70kg).
Intranasal
Fentanyl's intranasal inhalation in healthy volunteers.
Fentanyl - Nebulisation
3 administrations based on a weight-dependent threshold (20 µg/administration and for a weight \< 70kg and 30 µg/administration for a weight ≥ 70kg). The dose of each bolus will be distributed at equivalent volume in both nasal pits
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fentanyl - Inhalation by facial nebulization
3 administrations based on a weight-dependent threshold (40 µg per administration for a weight \< 70kg and 50 µg per administration for a weight ≥ 70kg).
Fentanyl - Nebulisation
3 administrations based on a weight-dependent threshold (20 µg/administration and for a weight \< 70kg and 30 µg/administration for a weight ≥ 70kg). The dose of each bolus will be distributed at equivalent volume in both nasal pits
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI between 19 and 29 kg/m²
* Affiliation to a social security scheme
* Adult who has read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form
* Woman capable of procreating (a woman is considered capable of procreating, i.e. fertile, after menarche and until she becomes menopausal, unless she is definitely sterile ) having very effective contraception (combined hormonal contraception (containing estrogens and progestins) associated with inhibition of ovulation, progestin-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, intrauterine device, hormone-releasing intrauterine system (IUS), bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomized partner, sexual abstinence) for 1 year and a negative urine pregnancy test at inclusion and during the duration of the study.
* Woman definitely surgically sterile (hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy). Postmenopausal woman: The postmenopausal state is defined by the absence of periods for 12 months without any other medical cause.
Exclusion Criteria
* Taking long-term painkillers or narcotics
* Sharp pain
* Stable chronic pain (\>3 months, with or without long-term treatment)
* Known chronic pathology stabilized or decompensated (hypertension, renal, cardiac, hepatic insufficiency, etc.)
* Stable or decompensated chronic respiratory pathology
* Chronic neuropsychiatric pathology likely to modify the pain threshold
* Long-term treatment with an action on the nervous system such as respiratory depression: benzodiazepines, neuroleptics, agonist/antagonist of the opioid system
* Treatment or toxicant whose association is not recommended with fentanyl (alcohol, cannabis, etc.)
* Central nervous system modulator treatment
* Pathologies blocking the pupillary response: Claude-Bernard-Horner syndrome, Adie syndrome, Argyll-Robertson pupil, senile miosis, dysautonomic neuropathy (advanced diabetes, systemic amyloidosis), cataract
* Treatment responsible for fluctuation in PUAL measurements: parasympathetic modulators (clonidine, dexmedetomidine, droperidol, metoclopramide)
* No-indication to FENTANYL PIRAMAL 100µg/2mL, solution for injection in ampoule
* No-indication to PROAMP SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9%, solution for injection
* Ongoing treatment with nasal vasoconstrictors
* Peripheral oxygen saturation less than 93%
* Alteration of cognitive state: comprehension disorder, language disorder, memory disorder, confusion
* Deaf or mute patient
* Usual heart rate such as HR\< 40 bpm and/or hypotension with systolic blood pressure SBP\< 100 mm Hg
* Atrioventricular block on ECG
* History of cataract surgery
* Confirmed or suspected covid 19 / active flu infection less than 15 days old
* Allergy to plastic
* Pregnant or parturient or breastfeeding woman or proven absence of contraception
* Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under judicial protection/under guardianship or curatorship
* Person participating in research participating in another trial / having participated in another trial within 2 weeks
* History of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol or preventing them from giving informed consent
18 Years
68 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Rouen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital, Rouen
Rouen, France, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barksdale AN, Hackman JL, Williams K, Gratton MC. ED triage pain protocol reduces time to receiving analgesics in patients with painful conditions. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;34(12):2362-2366. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.051. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Gueant S, Taleb A, Borel-Kuhner J, Cauterman M, Raphael M, Nathan G, Ricard-Hibon A. Quality of pain management in the emergency department: results of a multicentre prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Feb;28(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283418fb0.
Lvovschi V, Aubrun F, Bonnet P, Bouchara A, Bendahou M, Humbert B, Hausfater P, Riou B. Intravenous morphine titration to treat severe pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;26(6):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.025.
Galinski M, Robledo JB, Tellier E, Catoire P, De La Riviere C, Lvovschi V, Gil-Jardine C. Are Patients with Chronic Pain Less Satisfied with Their ED Management Than Non-Chronic Pain Patients? Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;56:7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 Mar 19. No abstract available.
Mudd S. Intranasal fentanyl for pain management in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Pediatr Health Care. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
Adelgais KM, Brent A, Wathen J, Tong S, Massanari D, Deakyne S, Sills MR. Intranasal Fentanyl and Quality of Pediatric Acute Care. J Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):607-615.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Hudson RJ, Thomson IR, Henderson BT, Singh K, Harding G, Peterson DJ. Validation of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Can J Anaesth. 2002 Apr;49(4):388-92. doi: 10.1007/BF03017328.
Follet C, Dumont A, Roussel M, Gillibert A, Boedard C, Quillard M, Ruault S, Vallin F, Donnadieu N, Nunes Ferreira D, Pereira T, Joly LM, Lvovschi V, Duflot T. AEROfen: protocol for a phase I, open-label, randomised crossover study evaluating the efficiency of nebulised fentanyl in healthy volunteers - comparing facial versus intranasal administration via pharmacometric modelling. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 3;15(7):e091125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091125.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022/0271/HP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.