Intravenous Buprenorphine Versus Morphine for Severe Pain in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT03256487

Last Updated: 2017-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-26

Study Completion Date

2018-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates intravenous (IV) buprenorphine versus IV morphine for the management of severe, acute pain among emergency department (ED) patients. ED patients with severe pain will be randomized in equal proportion to receive IV buprenorphine or IV morphine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Buprenorphine is classified as a partial mu opioid agonist and a weak kappa antagonist. In lower doses, buprenorphine has an analgesic potency 25 to 40 times more potent than similar milligram dosages of morphine. Consistent with its partial agonist activity, an apparent ceiling effect for opioid-induced ventilatory impairment has been demonstrated. These properties would suggest that buprenorphine is an effective analgesic with a favorable safety profile.

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine if there is a clinically significant difference in reduction of pain scores, measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), between intravenous (IV) buprenorphine and IV morphine for severe pain in patients presenting to the Alameda Health System--Highland Hospital ED. The investigators are evaluating if IV buprenorphine is non-inferior to IV morphing. The investigators hypothesize that buprenorphine will provide equivalent analgesic effects as morphine at 60 minutes, with a lower proportion of medication adverse effects.

Study Design: This is a double-blinded, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the analgesic efficacy of intravenous buprenorphine versus intravenous morphine for ED patients presenting with severe, acute pain.

Participants: ED patients aged ≥18 years old who present with severe (pain NRS ≥7), acute pain warranting (according the treating provider's judgment) and able to receive IV opioid analgesia. The investigators will exclude pregnant patients, patients deemed too critically ill by the provider, patients with allergy to buprenorphine or morphine, patients in custody, patients on methadone, patients who have taken/received short acting opioid medications in the last 12 hours, and patients who have taken/received long acting opioid medication in the past 24 hours.

Intervention: In arm A, patients will receive IV Buprenorphine 0.3mg diluted to a volume of 10mL with NS in a plastic syringe administered over 3-5 minute. In arm B, patients will receive IV morphine 0.1mg/kg (max 10mg) over 3-5 minutes. In both arms, at 20 minutes the patient will be asked "would you like more pain medication?" If he/she answers "yes", then he/she will receive a second dose of the same amount of medication they previously received based on the randomized arm they were placed into. At the end of the study time, 60 minutes, the patient's ongoing pain management will be left to the attending physician caring for the patient in the ED.

Data Collection: For both arms, the patients' NRS pain scores and adverse effects will be queried at times 0, 10min, 20 min, 30min, 40min, 50 min, and 60 min. Demographic and comorbidity data points will be abstracted during or after the study's conclusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The provider, nurse administering the medication, patient, and research assistant will be masked to the randomization and the drug provided. We will ensure masking by the following mechanisms: drugs will be prepared by the pharmacy staff in identical 10mL syringes; the medication will be diluted to a volume of 10mL with normal saline (NS); and both medications are clear so the syringes will appear identical. Both drugs will be administered over the same period of time, 3-5 minutes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Buprenorphine

Patients will receive IV buprenorphine 0.3mg diluted to a volume of 10mL with NS in a plastic syringe administered over 3-5 minutes. At 20 minutes, the patient will be asked "would you like more pain medication?" If he/she answers "yes", then he/she will receive a second dose of IV buprenorphine 0.3mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Buprenorphine

Intervention Type DRUG

buprenorphine 0.3mg IV

Morphine

Patients will receive IV morphine 0.1mg/kg (max dose 8mg) diluted to a volume of 10mL with NS in a plastic syringe administered over 3-5 minutes. At 20 minutes, the patient will be asked "would you like more pain medication?" If he/she answers "yes", then he/she will receive a second dose of IV morphine 0.1mg/kg (max dose 8mg).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV (max 8mg per dose)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Buprenorphine

buprenorphine 0.3mg IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Morphine Sulfate

morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV (max 8mg per dose)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ED patients with acute pain NRS ≥7 warranting IV opioid analgesia (according to ED provider)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* pregnancy

* level 1 trauma patients
* patients deemed critically ill by provider
* patients in custody
* patients on methadone
* Patients who have received or taken any short acting opioid medication in the past 12 hours.
* Patients who have received or taken any long acting opioid medication in the past 24 hours.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alameda Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Duong

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

David Duong, MD MS

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 510-437-4573

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

David K Duong, MD MS

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB17-04172B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id