Family Assessment of Pediatric Delirium

NCT ID: NCT05220761

Last Updated: 2022-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

235 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-09

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study the investigators will assess the validity, reliability and acceptability of utilizing family members to complete a delirium screen using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diagnosing delirium in the heterogenous PICU population is difficult. There is significant variability in pre-morbid neurodevelopmental status in children due to both age-related development as well as pre-morbid cognitive delay. The Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) has been validated in children of all ages and developmental stages. Several confounding factors have been identified that decrease the specificity of delirium detection and include confounding syndromes (i.e. iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome), pre-existing neuro-cognitive delay, and the specialty, experience and training of the assessor. Furthermore, pediatric critical care nurses have many competing interests in prioritizing care for their patients and can struggle with trying to familiarize themselves with the concept of delirium. This is a recognized barrier to routine compliance with delirium screening in PICUs. Family screening may be extremely valuable in early identification of delirium. This has been demonstrated in the critically ill adult population, however, with respect to family detection of delirium in their own children, the reliability of a pediatric screening tool has not been evaluated.

The proposed work is designed to improve both processes of care, by improving delirium screening, and patient outcomes by engaging families in the identification, prevention and management of delirium, in critically ill children.

This study will be conducted at 2 academic PICUs in Canada. Eligible children will be consented and enrolled. Parents/caregivers will be given brief education on delirium assessment and then complete a family tool based on the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD). This will then be validated against the RN completed CAPD.

In order to also assess the acceptability of family detection of PICU delirium interviews of family members and focus groups of HCP will be conducted using qualitative methodology to determine acceptance and feasibility and to guide future knowledge translation work.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Delirium

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium

Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium is a diagnostic test for PICU delirium State Behavioral Scale and Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale are diagnostic tests for sedation and agitation in children

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

State Behavioral Scale Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admitted to Alberta Children's Hospital or McMaster Children's Hospital PICU during study enrollment period
* Anticipated length of stay in PICU \>/=48 hours
* Substitute decision maker with the ability to provide informed consent
* Primary caregiver available for CAPD assessments,
* Primary caregiver is defined as the person primarily responsible for the care and upbringing of a child and could include: Parents, designated older sibling, foster parents/guardians, or grandparents, who fulfill this definition. There may be more than one primary caregiver for each child
* Translated CAPD and educational materials available in primary spoken language (French, Chinese, Italian or Spanish)

Exclusion Criteria

I. Anticipated discharge/transfer within 24 hours II. Family member unable to understand the instructions for CAPD assessment

a. This will be identified by the research assistant in collaboration with the bedside care team. i.e. language/cognitive barrier III. Child in irreversible coma (i.e. persistent vegetative state, RASS -4/SBS -2 or less and not reversible)
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laurie Lee

Adjunct Clinical Associate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laurie A. Lee, MN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Laurie A. Lee

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

McMaster Children's Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REB 20-2149

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nighttime Communication Study
NCT01836601 COMPLETED NA