A Patient-Partnered, Pan-Canadian, Comparative Effectiveness Evaluation of an Acute Pediatric Mental Health and Addiction Care Bundle
NCT ID: NCT04902391
Last Updated: 2025-07-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
6800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-09
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Innovative Model of Pediatric Acute Mental Health and Addictions Care
NCT04292379
How Safe Are Our Pediatric Emergency Departments?
NCT02162147
Painful Procedures in the Emergency Department: A Distraction Intervention (3-5 Year Olds)
NCT00337870
Outcomes in Youth Visiting the ED With Mental Health Issues: a Pilot Text Based Intervention
NCT02744326
Painful Procedures in the Emergency Department: A Distraction Intervention
NCT00338364
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Triage-based evaluation of risk for suicide \[Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and HEADS-ED, an assessment mnemonic (Home; Education \& Employment; Activities \& Peers; Drugs \& Alcohol; Suicidality; Emotions \& Behaviours; Discharge or Current Resources\]
2. Focused mental health team psychosocial evaluation to guide decision-making
3. Choice And Partnership Approach (CAPA) to care
This bundle of care also strives to remove the ED physician as the gatekeeper to mental health care and will facilitate, ideally, 24-48 hour urgent mental health follow-up (booked before the child/family leave the ED), with up to 96 hours to coordinate follow-up for patients attending the ED on weekends.
Primary Research Objective: To determine, in an 8-site, hybrid Type I cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial, if an acute mental health care bundle, compared to standard care, improves wellbeing at 30 days in children and youth seeking ED care for mental health and substance use concerns.
Secondary Research Objectives: (1) To determine if the bundle improves wellbeing, satisfaction with care, family functioning, and health care delivery; (2) To identify modifiable barriers, constraints, and enablers of bundle implementation fidelity and effectiveness; (3) To test if trial intervention effects are moderated by sociodemographic characteristics (sex, gender, ethnicity, culture, education, and socioeconomic status); and (4) To assess the cost-effectiveness of the approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acute Mental Health Care Bundle
We developed an evidence-based bundle of care to address current gaps in care. The bundle: 1) brings together multiple evidence-based assessment tools (ASQ, HEADS-ED) to ensure efficient, high-value ED-based care; 2) removes barriers to assessment and builds connections to care: Assessments are conducted by a mental health care provider and families have access to urgent follow-up care; and 3) prioritizes family engagement: A shared decision-making framework (Choice and Partnership) is used to promote children and youth as stewards of their care and support partnership between EDs and follow-up services with the duration of care determined collaboratively by the patient and their provider.
Health Services
The Acute Mental Health Care Bundle consists of 3 core elements, including: (1) ED triage, (2) ED assessment and care, and (3) follow-up care.
Usual ED-Based Mental Health Care
Local standards of ED-based mental health care will be delivered at control sites. Site leads have determined that this care does not involve the 3 specific core innovations in the bundle. Local care standards are similar across study sites and include use of CTAS score at triage (but no mental health risk assessment tool), ED physician medical clearance and assessment of consultation need, and no consistent mental health follow-up plan. Sites that are randomized to the control arm will not adopt core bundle elements.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Health Services
The Acute Mental Health Care Bundle consists of 3 core elements, including: (1) ED triage, (2) ED assessment and care, and (3) follow-up care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Chief triage concern of at least one of the following (or comparable) mental health CEDIS triage categories:
1. Anxiety/situational crisis and/or hyperventilation
2. Bizarre/paranoid behaviour
3. Concern for patient's welfare
4. Depression/suicidal/deliberate self-harm
5. Hallucinations/delusions
6. Violent/homicidal behaviour
7. Insomnia
8. Pediatric disruptive behaviour
Exclusion Criteria
2. Exhibiting features of schizophrenia, schizotypal, delusional disorders, or psychosis (e.g., hallucinations/delusions complaint should be reviewed carefully for this exclusion criterion)
3. Significant self-harm act (i.e., suicide attempt requiring medical clearance, excluding ideation or minor superficial wounds; e.g., laceration/puncture, overdose ingestion, etc.)
4. Other co-morbid medical concerns requiring oversight and/or medical clearance from an emergency physician (e.g., confusion/disorientation, substance withdrawal, other medical complaints, etc.)
5. Substance misuse/intoxication or altered level of consciousness
6. Exhibiting a behavioural syndrome associated with physiologic disturbances (e.g., anorexia)
Children/youth will also be excluded based on language barriers:
7. Language barrier (i.e., patient and parent/legal guardian must be fluent in either English or French)
8 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
University of Saskatchewan
OTHER
University of Manitoba
OTHER
McMaster University
OTHER
Western University, Canada
OTHER
University of Toronto
OTHER
McGill University
OTHER
Dalhousie University
OTHER
Memorial University of Newfoundland
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen Freedman, MDCM, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Amanda Newton, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Children's Hospital of Winnipeg
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Janeway Children's Hospital
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
IWK Health Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
McMaster Children's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Montreal Children's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Jim Pattison Children's Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rasiah J, Freedman S, Macdonald L, Prisnie K, Eltorki M, Finkelstein Y, Hopkin G, Santana MJ, Thull-Freedman J, Stang A, Prebeg M, Gagnon IJ, Steele M, Mater A, Katz L, Greenfield B, Plotnick L, Monga S, Lipman EL, Wright B, Dimitropoulos G, Porter R, Hurley K, Al Hamarneh YN, Newton A. Evaluation of parent and youth experiences in advisory groups as part of a mental healthcare clinical trial: protocol for a mixed-method study. BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 17;12(6):e059689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059689.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB20-1825
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.