The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for Children; A Prospective Multi-Center Evaluation.

NCT ID: NCT00807352

Last Updated: 2011-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1464 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and the reproducibility of the canadian triage and acuity scale when applied by regular nurses for the triage of children in the Emergency Department.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The role of triage in the Emergency Department (ED) is to assign high priority to patients who need urgent care while identifying patients that may be able to wait safely. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is a triage tool constructed from a consensus of experts that is universally used in Canada. Until now, there has been no evaluation of the validity of the tool for children in a clinical context. Also, its inter-rater reproducibility has not been evaluated. The expected implementation of a revised version of the Canadian triage tool in 2008 would be an ideal moment to evaluate its validity and reproducibility. Specific objective: 1. To evaluate the validity of the CTAS for children visiting a pediatric ED and 2. To measure the inter-rater agreement for nurses using the CTAS in these settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Triage Pediatrics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

level 2

Patients triaged level 2

No interventions assigned to this group

level 3

patients triaged level 3

No interventions assigned to this group

level 4

patients triaged level 4

No interventions assigned to this group

level 5

patients triaged level 5

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Every patient younger than 18 years old that presents to the ED will be eligible except for those that need to go directly to the resuscitation room (triage level 1)

Exclusion Criteria

* For ethical reasons, patients that need an immediate treatment will not be recruited in the study.
* Patients for whom an informed consent could not be obtained (example: insurmountable language barriers) will not be included.
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

SickKids Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Justine's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

CHU Sainte-Justine

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jocelyn Gravel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Justine's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alberta Children's Hospital

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Stollery Children's Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

BC Children's and Women's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

IWK Heath Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Western Ontario

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHU Sainte-Justine

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gravel J, Gouin S, Manzano S, Arsenault M, Amre D. Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18945238 (View on PubMed)

Gravel J, Gouin S, Goldman RD, Osmond MH, Fitzpatrick E, Boutis K, Guimont C, Joubert G, Millar K, Curtis S, Sinclair D, Amre D. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):71-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22305329 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Grant No. XG09-049R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PERC CTAS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ACEs Referral From PED
NCT06574633 COMPLETED NA