Coronary Revascularization Based on CMR Viability Study Vs Direct Revascularization in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients
NCT ID: NCT05194865
Last Updated: 2022-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-01
2023-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CMR for Prognosis Assessment in NSTEMI
NCT03516578
Improved Prediction of Functional Recovery After Revascularisation Using Combined Assessment of Myocardial Ischaemia and Viability by CMR - Pilot Study
NCT03798652
A 10-Minute Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Protocol for Cardiac Disease
NCT04464655
Predictive Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Related Parameters in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI for Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
NCT04789564
EARLY-MYO-CMR Registry
NCT03768453
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the evaluation of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, CMR is primarily used in the setting of chronic CAD for the evaluation of myocardial ischemia and viability.
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, resulting from coronary artery disease is reversible with revascularization in cases of hibernation and stunned myocardium. Revascularization is dependent not only on the presence but also the extent of viability, and a viable myocardium is necessary for functional recovery.
In a CMR study, in areas with dysfunctional myocardium as detected in cine sequences, the end diastolic wall thinning \>5.5 mm, the extent of subendocardial fibrosis together with response to low dose dobutamine were shown to predict functional recovery.
However, in the famous viability sub study of the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial, there was a significant association between myocardial viability and outcome by univariate analysis, but not on multivariable analysis. Thereby, the value of CMR in this regards is still debatable.
So, according to the recent state of art paper from the American Heart Association, data is still limited regarding CMR use to guide revascularization strategies or predict outcomes in patients with severe LV dysfunction. The statement recommended that future trials should continue to address the clinical impact of specific modality-based strategies or multimodality strategies in guiding treatment in terms of patient outcomes.
On the other hand, appropriately guided coronary revascularization may go beyond providing recovery of myocardial systolic contractility by improving patient's functional class and heart failure symptoms, enhancing diastolic relaxation, reducing the burden of rhythm abnormalities, or decreasing the burden of polypharmacy, thereby reducing the risk of drug toxicity and improving quality of life. These additional benefits need also to be explored in clinical trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CMR viability study group
Diagnostic Test: CMR Basic CMR data including LV and RV volumes, SWMA reported, EF and wall thinning will be collected.
* SWMA from SSFP sequences will be reported and numbered according to the usual (1 normal, 2 hypokinetic, 3 akinetic, 4 dyskinetic, 5 aneurysmal).
* Data of viability assessed with LGE imaging with scar measurement using standard deviation method with SD of 4-5 will be used.
* AHA 17 segment model will be used as a reference for LV segmentation.
* Viability scoring will be calculated for each segment based on the transmurality index, in a semiautomated method, with no scar given 0, 1-25% subendocardial scar given score 1, 25-50% given 2, 50-75% given 3, \>75% as 4.
* Wall thinning will be given 0 or 1 score for each segment, with 1 given for \<6 mm thickness.
cardiac MRI
assessment of the viability using CMR
direct revascularization group
Direct Coronary revascularization
Percutaneous coronary intervention
direct revascularization using PCI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cardiac MRI
assessment of the viability using CMR
Percutaneous coronary intervention
direct revascularization using PCI
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients presenting for viability assessment to Assiut university Heart Hospital, starting from October 2020 till September 2021, will be retrospectively recruited.
3. Patients with a coronary angiography that is amenable for revascularization. The decision and type of revascularization will be determined by the treating physicians.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy confirmed by both CMR and coronary angiography.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Attiya Abdelmuty Mahmoud
Resident doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hosam H. Elaraby, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Professor at cardiovascular medicine department , assiut university
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42. doi: 10.1161/hc0402.102975. No abstract available.
Garcia MJ, Kwong RY, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Taub CC, Blankstein R, Lima J, Bonow RO, Eshtehardi P, Bois JP; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention and Council on Clinical Cardiology. State of the Art: Imaging for Myocardial Viability: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jul;13(7):e000053. doi: 10.1161/HCI.0000000000000053. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Bax JJ, Delgado V. Myocardial viability as integral part of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to ischemic heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Apr;22(2):229-45. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0096-5. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Shah DJ, Kim HW, James O, Parker M, Wu E, Bonow RO, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Prevalence of regional myocardial thinning and relationship with myocardial scarring in patients with coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2013 Mar 6;309(9):909-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.1381.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMR Vs PCI revascularization
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.