Clinical Study on the Application of a Specimen Retrieving Bag to Reduce the Polyp Fragmentation Rate
NCT ID: NCT05189912
Last Updated: 2024-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
204 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-17
2022-08-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
By removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port, the polyp fragmentation rate was reduced greatly. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and colon insertions, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Using Regular or Rotary Polypectomy Snare for the Resection of Colorectal Polyps
NCT03608930
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06937047
Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05825664
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598
Cap Assisted Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colon Polyps
NCT01211132
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Some effective methods were developed to reduce polyp fragmentation, including removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port. The resulting polyp fragmentation rates are 22.4-43.0% and 18.5%, respectively. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and improving the efficiency of the operation, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. In a previous pilot study, the polyp receiving bag has been applied in clinical practice, and its polyp fragmentation rate and polyp recovery failure rate are quite low. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the Polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Specimen retrieving bag group
Resected polyps were retrieved by specimen retrieving bag. This group was set as a experimental group.
Specimen retrieving bag
Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.
Suction group
Resected polyps were retrieved by removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.
This group was set as a control group.
Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port
Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Specimen retrieving bag
Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.
Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port
Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Underlying bleeding disorder,
3. The platelet count less than 50×10\^9/L,
4. Serious cardio-pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease,
5. Intolerance to endoscopy,
6. Other high-risk conditions or disease (such as massive ascites, etc.),
7. Pregnancy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yan Liu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beijing 302 Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hosptial
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chu J, Ma C, Min M, Bi Q, Shen W, Zhang X, Zhang H, Li A, Liu Y, Lu Z. A novel polyp retrieval bag reduces the polyp fragmentation rate in colon polypectomy: a single-blind randomized controlled study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul 24;39(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04694-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Polyp bag frag
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.