Clinical Study on the Application of a Specimen Retrieving Bag to Reduce the Polyp Fragmentation Rate

NCT ID: NCT05189912

Last Updated: 2024-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

204 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-17

Study Completion Date

2022-08-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a larger diameter (\>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive polyps by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. But it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received by this method, many polyps were fragmented. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal.

By removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port, the polyp fragmentation rate was reduced greatly. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and colon insertions, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After polyp resection, it is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a small diameter (≤5mm), usually by pressing the suction valve button of the colonoscope, polyps could be completely retrieved through a trap. For polyps with a larger diameter (\>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive resected polyps with larger diameters by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. However, it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received, many polyps were fragmented, and the polyp fragmentation rate can be as high as 36.6%\~ 60.3%. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal. Due to the possibility of malignant transformation in some polyps, the completeness of polyp resection is essential to guide the following treatment.

Some effective methods were developed to reduce polyp fragmentation, including removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port. The resulting polyp fragmentation rates are 22.4-43.0% and 18.5%, respectively. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and improving the efficiency of the operation, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. In a previous pilot study, the polyp receiving bag has been applied in clinical practice, and its polyp fragmentation rate and polyp recovery failure rate are quite low. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the Polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonic Polyp

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Patients were not informed about their randomization allocation in order to increase reliability during follow-up.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Specimen retrieving bag group

Resected polyps were retrieved by specimen retrieving bag. This group was set as a experimental group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Specimen retrieving bag

Intervention Type DEVICE

Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.

Suction group

Resected polyps were retrieved by removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.

This group was set as a control group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Specimen retrieving bag

Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port

Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Single polyp, with a diameter of 5-15mm,
2. Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Polyps that were not removed en bloc,
2. Underlying bleeding disorder,
3. The platelet count less than 50×10\^9/L,
4. Serious cardio-pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease,
5. Intolerance to endoscopy,
6. Other high-risk conditions or disease (such as massive ascites, etc.),
7. Pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yan Liu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beijing 302 Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hosptial

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chu J, Ma C, Min M, Bi Q, Shen W, Zhang X, Zhang H, Li A, Liu Y, Lu Z. A novel polyp retrieval bag reduces the polyp fragmentation rate in colon polypectomy: a single-blind randomized controlled study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul 24;39(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04694-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39048748 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Polyp bag frag

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cold Polypectomy Site Study
NCT02205125 COMPLETED