Subthreshold SCS or BMT

NCT ID: NCT05169047

Last Updated: 2025-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-07

Study Completion Date

2026-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Given the substantial socioeconomic impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) implantations and given that currently no direct high-quality evidence with a relevant outcome measurement is available to guide the treatment choice between subthreshold SCS versus best medical treatment in patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), we here propose a scientifically well-constructed randomized controlled trial to answer this question.

The primary scientific objective is to examine whether subthreshold SCS, compared to best medical treatment, provided to patients with PSPS-T2 results in a higher percentage of clinical holistic responders at 6 months. The secondary objective of the study is to examine if subthreshold SCS compared with BMT is having more efficacy in improving patients' individual competencies for self-management, increasing the likelihood to return to work, work status and healthcare expenditure, improving pain relief, obtaining pain medication reduction, decreasing anxiety and depression, increasing quality of life and decreasing disability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After filling in the questionnaires at the 6 months follow-up visit, patients could change treatment groups (in both directions). This decision will be a shared decisions between patient and treating physician in case the randomized intervention did not provided enough pain relief.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Best Medical Treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Best Medical Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

For each patient who is randomized to BMT, an optimal individual treatment plan will be developed by the treating physician.

Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

SCS will be programmed at subthreshold stimulation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Best Medical Treatment

For each patient who is randomized to BMT, an optimal individual treatment plan will be developed by the treating physician.

Intervention Type OTHER

Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation

SCS will be programmed at subthreshold stimulation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II (PSPS-T2)
* Chronic pain as a result of PSPS-T2 that exists for at least 6 months with a pain intensity of at least 4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale, refractory to conservative treatment.
* PSPS-T2 patients eligible for subthreshold SCS
* Age \> 18 years
* Patient has been informed of the study procedures and has given written informed consent
* Patient willing to comply with study protocol including attending the study visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Expected inability of patients to receive or properly operate the spinal cord stimulation system
* Evidence of an active psychiatric disorder
* Suffering from another chronic illness characterised by chronic generalized widespread pain (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, scleroderma).
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Moens Maarten

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Moens Maarten

principal investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jessa Ziekenhuis

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Jette, , Belgium

Site Status

Emmaüs, AZ Sint-Maarten

Mechelen, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ Delta

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ Turnhout

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goudman L, Putman K, Van Doorslaer L, Billot M, Roulaud M, Rigoard P; TRADITION consortium; Moens M. Proportion of clinical holistic responders in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type II treated by subthreshold spinal cord stimulation compared to best medical treatment: a study protocol for a multicentric randomised controlled trial (TRADITION). Trials. 2023 Feb 20;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07140-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36803412 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRADITION

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.