EEG Mapping During High Frequency/High Density Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT02751216

Last Updated: 2019-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is an interventional, observatory single center trial investigating the functional connectivity of the electrical brain activity in high frequency/high density spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with back and leg pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Based on the reimbursement rules in Belgium, a trial implantation of 4 weeks is necessary before implanting the definitive neurostimulator. The definitive neurostimulator will be implanted minimum 4 weeks after the trial implantation, when the patient reports more than 50% pain reduction and/or more than 50% reduction in pain medication.

Patients who are included in this study will have four extra study visits at the University Hospital Brussels. The first assessment will take place during the week prior to surgery, the second minimal one month after definitive implantation of the stimulator. The assessments consist of filling in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and recording brain activity before and during the pain protocol. Additionally, patients will wear an Actiwatch for measuring sleep patterns and fill in a VAS diary (back and leg pain separately), one month before the baseline assessment and one month before the second assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

spinal cord stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EEG recording + pain protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EEG recording + pain protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject is at least 18 years old.
2. Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol
3. Diagnosis of FBSS with predominant leg pain (VAS) \> 5) and non-dominant back pain.
4. Cognitive and language functioning enabling coherent communication between the examiner and the subject;
5. Failed conservative treatments for pain including but not limited to pharmacological therapy and physical therapy
6. Stable neurologic function in the past 30 days
7. In the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is psychologically appropriate for the implantation for an active implantable medical device
8. Subject is able to provide written informed consent
9. Subject speaks Dutch or French.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Female subject of childbearing potential is pregnant/nursing, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the trial
2. Subject has had radiofrequency treatment of an intended target DRG within the past 3 months
3. Subject currently has an active implantable device including ICD, pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, deep brain stimulator or intrathecal drug pump
4. Subject is unable to operate the device or has no relative available.
5. Subjects with indwelling devices that may pose an increased risk of infection
6. Subjects currently has an active infection
7. Subject has, in the opinion of the Investigator, a medical comorbidity that contraindicates placement of an active medical device
8. Subject has participated in another clinical investigation within 30 days
9. Subject has a coagulation disorder or uses anticoagulants that, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes participation
10. Subject has been diagnosed with cancer in the past 2 years
11. Life expectancy \< 6 months
12. Imaging (MRI, CT, x-ray) findings within the last 12 months that, in the Investigator's opinion, contraindicates lead placement
13. Existing extreme fear for entering MRI
14. General contraindication for MRI (pacemaker, etc…)
15. Age male/female patient \<18 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Moens Maarten

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Moens Maarten

Prof. dr.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maarten Moens, Prof. dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UZ Brussel

Brussels, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

De Ridder D, Vanneste S. Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation: Different and Common Brain Mechanisms. Neuromodulation. 2016 Jan;19(1):47-59. doi: 10.1111/ner.12368. Epub 2015 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26586145 (View on PubMed)

Moens M, Marien P, Brouns R, Poelaert J, De Smedt A, Buyl R, Droogmans S, Van Schuerbeek P, Sunaert S, Nuttin B. Spinal cord stimulation modulates cerebral neurobiology: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neuroradiology. 2013 Aug;55(8):1039-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1200-7. Epub 2013 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23665999 (View on PubMed)

Goudman L, Brouns R, De Groote S, De Jaeger M, Huysmans E, Forget P, Moens M. Association Between Spinal Cord Stimulation and Top-Down Nociceptive Inhibition in People With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Cohort Study. Phys Ther. 2019 Jul 1;99(7):915-923. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz051.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30916768 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EEGInspiration1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Subthreshold SCS or BMT
NCT05169047 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Stimwave HF SCS Pilot Study
NCT02787252 COMPLETED NA