Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of EESS in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries

NCT ID: NCT04496609

Last Updated: 2022-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-12

Study Completion Date

2023-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neurological disability caused by traumatic lesions of the spinal cord is a significant challenge for medicine and society. These lesions, leading to sublesional central nervous system dysfunction, include sensorimotor, vesico-sphincter and genito-sexual disorders. To date, there is no treatment that enables spinal cord function to be restored.

Preclinical studies have been able to demonstrate the recovery of locomotor activity with a combination of locomotor training, pharmacological intervention and epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord (EESS) in adult rats with spinal cord transection. An American team have recently been able to show that EESS, combined with locomotor training, caused neurological improvement in four paraplegic patients, with electromyographic muscular activation patterns similar to those observed during walking. In fact, these authors also showed an improvement, under stimulation, of the VS and GS functions, but with no detailed documentation.

Starting with a conceptual and preclinical rationale, and with proof of clinical concept demonstrated in several reported cases, we propose a clinical trial with an original cross-over design to validate the hypothesis that EESS combined with training in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries would, with a good tolerance profile, allow motor, vesico-sphincter (VS) and genito-sexual (GS) disorders to be restored in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stimulation-automated rehabilitation/automated rehabilitation

* Stimulation and automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days
* Washout 30 days
* Automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stimulation and automated rehabilitation / automated rehabilitation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stimulation and automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days

Automated rehabilitation/Stimulation-automated rehabilitation

* Automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days
* Washout 30 days
* Stimulation and automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Automated rehabilitation / Stimulation and automated rehabilitation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stimulation and automated rehabilitation / automated rehabilitation

Stimulation and automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days

Intervention Type DEVICE

Automated rehabilitation / Stimulation and automated rehabilitation

Automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged between 18 and 65 years inclusive
* Male or female
* Incomplete ASIA B or C spinal cord lesion with level of lesion located above T10 (sensation preserved below level of lesion)
* Absence of significant motor deficit of the upper limbs or recovered motor deficit (muscular score ≥ 4/5)
* Patient with spinal cord injury at least 2 years old and considered stable not walking
* Spinal cord lesion determined by spinal cord MRI (intramedullary hypersignal)
* Patient who can benefit from an iterative rehabilitation programme
* Patient with stable health condition with no cardiopulmonary disease
* Patient with orthopaedic condition compatible with verticality and walking
* Persistence of adductor reflexes up to L2
* Patient with no current neuromodulation implant: spinal cord neurostimulator, brain, peripheral nerve or intrathecal treatment
* Patient with no coagulopathy, cardiac risk factors or other medical risk factors significant for surgery
* Local anatomical conditions compatible with implantation of the epidural electrode (determined by MRI of the spinal cord)
* Person who benefits from or is entitled to a social security scheme
* Having provided signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Significant cerebral lesion on a previous cerebral MRI
* Psychiatric or cognitive disorder history (known or detected during the consultation with the psychologist)
* Protected adult patients
* Pregnant (determined by a negative pregnancy test) or breastfeeding women
* Respiratory failure (vital capacity \< 50%) (surgery in prone position)
* Repeated urinary infections (≥3 per year)
* Planned absence that may hinder participation in the study (travelling abroad, relocation, imminent moving)
* Patients with spasms (PENN scale \> 2)
* Cauda equina syndrome
* Patients presenting with a contraindication to an MRI being carried out: i) pacemaker, ii) non-MRI-compatible heart valve, iii) clips, stents, coils, etc. that are not MRI-compatible, iv) cochlear implant, v) metal foreign body, etc.)
* Patients presenting with a contraindication to MEPs being carried out (notably wearing of ferromagnetic material, heart stimulator)
* Patients on oral anticoagulants
* Patients with botulinic toxin injection
* Patients with bedsore
* Undernourished patients (BMI \< 19)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hopital Foch

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Béchir Jarraya, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hôpital Foch

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Garches, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Hôpital Foch

Suresnes, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Elisabeth Hulier-Ammar

Role: CONTACT

+33 1 46 25 11 75

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nicolas Roche, MD

Role: primary

+33 1 47 10 79 00

Béchir Jarraya, MD

Role: primary

+33 1 46 25 29 66

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016/50

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.