Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of EESS in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries
NCT ID: NCT04496609
Last Updated: 2022-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-12
2023-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Preclinical studies have been able to demonstrate the recovery of locomotor activity with a combination of locomotor training, pharmacological intervention and epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord (EESS) in adult rats with spinal cord transection. An American team have recently been able to show that EESS, combined with locomotor training, caused neurological improvement in four paraplegic patients, with electromyographic muscular activation patterns similar to those observed during walking. In fact, these authors also showed an improvement, under stimulation, of the VS and GS functions, but with no detailed documentation.
Starting with a conceptual and preclinical rationale, and with proof of clinical concept demonstrated in several reported cases, we propose a clinical trial with an original cross-over design to validate the hypothesis that EESS combined with training in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries would, with a good tolerance profile, allow motor, vesico-sphincter (VS) and genito-sexual (GS) disorders to be restored in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study on Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Epidural Electrical Stimulation to Manage Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06845904
Brain Controlled Spinal Cord Stimulation In Participants With Spinal Cord Injury For Lower Limb Rehabilitation
NCT06243952
Restoring Hemodynamic Stability Using Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation Following Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04994886
Harnessing Neuroplasticity of Postural Sensorimotor Networks Using Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation to Maximize Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06213012
Epidural Electrical Stimulation to Restore Standing and Walking in Patients With Chronic Paralysis Due to Spinal Cord Injury: A Study on Motor Recovery, Spasticity Reduction, and Quality of Life Improvement Through Neuromodulation and Intensive Rehabilitation
NCT06847295
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stimulation-automated rehabilitation/automated rehabilitation
* Stimulation and automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days
* Washout 30 days
* Automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days
Stimulation and automated rehabilitation / automated rehabilitation
Stimulation and automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days
Automated rehabilitation/Stimulation-automated rehabilitation
* Automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days
* Washout 30 days
* Stimulation and automated rehabilitation (2 sessions of 45 minutes per day) for 40 working days
Automated rehabilitation / Stimulation and automated rehabilitation
Automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stimulation and automated rehabilitation / automated rehabilitation
Stimulation and automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days
Automated rehabilitation / Stimulation and automated rehabilitation
Automated rehabilitation for 40 working days, then washout during 30 days, then automated rehabilitation for 40 working days
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female
* Incomplete ASIA B or C spinal cord lesion with level of lesion located above T10 (sensation preserved below level of lesion)
* Absence of significant motor deficit of the upper limbs or recovered motor deficit (muscular score ≥ 4/5)
* Patient with spinal cord injury at least 2 years old and considered stable not walking
* Spinal cord lesion determined by spinal cord MRI (intramedullary hypersignal)
* Patient who can benefit from an iterative rehabilitation programme
* Patient with stable health condition with no cardiopulmonary disease
* Patient with orthopaedic condition compatible with verticality and walking
* Persistence of adductor reflexes up to L2
* Patient with no current neuromodulation implant: spinal cord neurostimulator, brain, peripheral nerve or intrathecal treatment
* Patient with no coagulopathy, cardiac risk factors or other medical risk factors significant for surgery
* Local anatomical conditions compatible with implantation of the epidural electrode (determined by MRI of the spinal cord)
* Person who benefits from or is entitled to a social security scheme
* Having provided signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Psychiatric or cognitive disorder history (known or detected during the consultation with the psychologist)
* Protected adult patients
* Pregnant (determined by a negative pregnancy test) or breastfeeding women
* Respiratory failure (vital capacity \< 50%) (surgery in prone position)
* Repeated urinary infections (≥3 per year)
* Planned absence that may hinder participation in the study (travelling abroad, relocation, imminent moving)
* Patients with spasms (PENN scale \> 2)
* Cauda equina syndrome
* Patients presenting with a contraindication to an MRI being carried out: i) pacemaker, ii) non-MRI-compatible heart valve, iii) clips, stents, coils, etc. that are not MRI-compatible, iv) cochlear implant, v) metal foreign body, etc.)
* Patients presenting with a contraindication to MEPs being carried out (notably wearing of ferromagnetic material, heart stimulator)
* Patients on oral anticoagulants
* Patients with botulinic toxin injection
* Patients with bedsore
* Undernourished patients (BMI \< 19)
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hopital Foch
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Béchir Jarraya, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Foch
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
Garches, , France
Hôpital Foch
Suresnes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016/50
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.