Safety and Tolerability of a Novel Implantable Neurostimulator for Ameliorate Erectile Function on Spinal Cord Injured Patients
NCT ID: NCT06347575
Last Updated: 2025-06-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-31
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As the secondary objectives, despite the limited cohort size, this long-term study aims to obtain preliminary data on efficacy of cavernous nerve stimulation to improve erectile function for sexual intercourse, as well as to assess patient's satisfaction using:
* Objective assessment of the erectile response upon CaverSTIM activation with the RigiScan device.
* Subjective assessment of the erectile function with validated questionnaires:
1. A 6-item self-report instrument assessing male erectile function (Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF-EF);
2. A log-diary five item questionnaire completed after each sexual attempt (Sexual Encounter Profile, SEP);
3. A self-reporting measure that scores erection hardness on a 4-point scale (Erection Hardness Score, EHS);
4. The Global Assessment Question (GAQ).
In addition, the study aims to refine the method of implantation (step-by-step delineation of all technical approaches for device implantation, including duration of surgical procedure, blood loss, methods to access the periprostatic region, tissue dissection, device placement and fixation) prior to planning for larger scale clinical investigation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fertility of Spinal Cord Injured Men
NCT02144558
Pilot Study of Ejaculatory Dyssynergia by Electronic Microsensors of Sphincters
NCT02974673
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Mononeuropathy
NCT06546371
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of EESS in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries
NCT04496609
Study on Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Epidural Electrical Stimulation to Manage Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06845904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The concept of electro-neurostimulation therapy to activate the cavernous nerves for erectile dysfunction was introduced two decades ago. Despite its recognized potential and the first promising studies confirming the feasibility of peri-prostatic cavernous nerve stimulation, this technology has not yet been developed. The difficulty lies in the complex anatomy of the human cavernous nerve. Indeed, it is difficult to identify the optimal site for stimulation because the human cavernous nerve is not visible on a macroscopic scale and extends from the pelvic plexus to the penis through a peri-vesical and peri-prostatic neuroplexus. whose anatomy is complex. In addition, the course of the cavernous nerve is subject to strong interindividual variability. In addition to these intrinsic anatomical problems, other difficulties are encountered during the surgical intervention, such as the presence of overlying tissues, connective tissue and potential bleeding obstructing the operative field, thus making the optimal placement of the implants complex.. The main difficulty in applying neurostimulation to the treatment of erectile dysfunction is therefore to identify the stimulation site to place the stimulation electrodes in optimal contact with the cavernous nerve.
A practical solution was invented by a patch with twelve electrodes. This solution was designed to promote extensive contact with the cavernous nerve. The concept was developed to allow implantation of the electrodes regardless of the visibility of the cavernous nerve bundles. This concept makes it possible to globally cover the anatomical region of interest where the cavernous nerve is supposed to be located, while taking into account the great heterogeneity of its course. This approach then guarantees optimal contact of at least a few electrodes with the cavernous nerve and thus offers optimal stimulation conditions.
The multi-electrode patches will be implanted during a robotic laparoscopic surgical procedure. A stimulation test will be performed during the operation to ensure that the patient responds to stimulation (erectile response) before the device is permanently implanted. Following the recovery of the patient, the selection of the stimulation parameters will be carried out on an outpatient basis in order to identify the electrode(s) which give(s) the best erectile response. The electrodes in contact with the cavernous nerve bundles (causing the maximum erectile response) will then be selected and recorded for stimulation/therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Implantation of the caverStim device
Implantation of caverStim in SCI patients
Implantation of the caverStim device
Implantation of caverStim in SCI patients.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implantation of the caverStim device
Implantation of caverStim in SCI patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Men between the age of 18 to 45 years old with supra sacral spinal cord injury and below T6 as the upper limit;
* Men with stable spinal cord injury, which occurred at least 6 months prior to study enrolment;
* Men with documented neurogenic overactive detrusor activity according to urodynamic testing in their files;
* Have a monogamous relationship with a female sexual partner (vaginal penetration required for several of the primary efficacy variables) for at least 6 months prior to screening
* Men with an insufficient response to PDE5-Is and interested in treating erectile dysfunction;
* Ability to understand and follow study-related instructions.
* At least 4 sexual intercourse attempts during the 4-week run-in phase with use of 100 mg sildenafil approximately 1 hour before attempting intercourse
* IIEF-EF score \< 17 at the end of the run-in phase;
* At least 50% of attempts at sexual intercourse during the run-in phase had been unsuccessful i.e. the following question in the SEP Diary had to be answered with "No":
"Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" (SEP3: success in maintenance of erection).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with known allergies to any of the device material (Platinum/iridium, silicone, pellethane, titanium, polysulfone, polyurethane);
* Patients contraindicated for surgery under general anesthesia;
* History of priapism or Lapeyronie's disease;
* Patients having met the criteria for unstable angina within 6 months prior to Visit 1, history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft surgery within 90 days prior to Visit 1, or percutaneous coronary intervention (eg, angioplasty or stent placement) within 90 days prior to Visit 1.
* Any supraventricular arrhythmia with an uncontrolled ventricular response (mean heart rate \>100 bpm) at rest despite medical therapy, or any history of spontaneous or induced sustained ventricular tachycardia (heart rate \>100 bpm for \>=30 sec) despite medical therapy;
* A history of sudden cardiac death (arrest) despite medical therapy.
* Any evidence of congestive heart failure within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
* History of previous pelvic surgery or irradiation therapy;
* Prior surgery for an implantable penile prosthesis;
* Inability to understand and to follow instructions on device use;
* Patients with diabetes mellitus
* Patients not interested in sexual activity;
* Patients currently participating in another clinical investigation;
* Patient has participated in any drug or device trial in the last 4 weeks or plans to participate in any other drug or device study in the next 24 months;
* Any other characteristics that, per the investigator's judgment, may increase the patients risk or impair the study conduct and data collection; such as depression or abnormal behavior for example.
18 Years
45 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Comphya SA
UNKNOWN
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
François Giuliano, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of neurology-urology-andrology, Raymond Poincaré hospital - APHP
Emmanuel CHARTIER-KASTLER, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpétrière hospital - APHP
Anne Charlotte DENORMANDIE, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpétrière hospital - APHP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of neurology-urology-andrology, Raymond Poincaré hospital - APHP
Garches, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP230522
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.