Cold vs. Paraspinal Stimulation for Erectile and Urinary Function in SCI Patients

NCT ID: NCT07101042

Last Updated: 2025-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-10-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being conducted to compare the effects of two simple treatments-cold therapy and electrical stimulation applied to the lower back-on sexual function and urinary control in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Many individuals with SCI experience difficulties with erection and urinary leakage, which can negatively affect their quality of life.

In this study, participants will be assigned to receive either cold stimulation (using ice massage) or electrical stimulation over the spine. Each treatment will be applied three times a week for four weeks. The study will measure improvements in erectile function using a questionnaire called SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory for Men), and urinary control using a short-form urinary incontinence questionnaire.

The goal is to identify which treatment provides better results, is more comfortable for patients, and can be safely used as part of rehabilitation in clinical settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are among the most challenging secondary complications faced by men with spinal cord injury (SCI). These dysfunctions result primarily from disruption of spinal autonomic pathways and contribute significantly to reduced quality of life, social participation, and psychological well-being. Despite their clinical significance, non-invasive therapeutic approaches targeting autonomic recovery are under-researched.

This randomized controlled trial investigates the comparative effects of two non-invasive stimulation techniques-localized cold stimulation and paraspinal electrical stimulation-on erectile function and urinary incontinence in adult males with chronic SCI. Cold therapy activates superficial sensory afferents and spinal reflex arcs, while paraspinal stimulation is hypothesized to engage deeper segmental pathways within the thoracolumbar cord that contribute to pelvic organ regulation.

The study is designed to assess changes in erectile function using the SHIM questionnaire and changes in urinary incontinence using the ICIQ-UI SF. Both interventions will be applied over four weeks, with standardized protocols and session frequency. Findings from this trial may offer insight into accessible, low-risk options for addressing autonomic dysfunction in SCI and guide future rehabilitation protocols focused on quality-of-life outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups. The first group received localized cold stimulation, while the second group received paraspinal electrical stimulation. Both interventions were applied independently, with no crossover between groups throughout the study period.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Only the outcomes assessor was blinded to group allocation. Participants and care providers were aware of the intervention being delivered due to the physical nature of the treatments (cold vs. electrical stimulation). The blinded assessor was responsible for administering and scoring all post-treatment outcome measures.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cold Stimulation

Participants in this group received localized cold therapy using ice massage applied to the suprapubic and inner thigh regions for 20 minutes per session, three times per week for four weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cold Stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Ice massage using circular movements over the suprapubic and inner thigh areas to stimulate sensory afferents. Each session lasted 20 minutes, delivered 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

Paraspinal Stimulation

Participants in this group received surface electrical stimulation over the T12-L2 paraspinal region. Sessions were 30 minutes each, delivered three times per week for four weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paraspinal Electrical Stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Surface electrodes applied bilaterally to the T12-L2 region. Parameters: 20 Hz frequency, 200 µs pulse width, intensity set below motor threshold. Sessions were administered 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cold Stimulation

Ice massage using circular movements over the suprapubic and inner thigh areas to stimulate sensory afferents. Each session lasted 20 minutes, delivered 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Paraspinal Electrical Stimulation

Surface electrodes applied bilaterally to the T12-L2 region. Parameters: 20 Hz frequency, 200 µs pulse width, intensity set below motor threshold. Sessions were administered 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male participants aged 25 to 55 years
* Confirmed diagnosis of thoracic or lumbar spinal cord injury (≥ 6 months post-injury)
* Presence of erectile dysfunction, indicated by a SHIM score ≤ 21
* Self-reported urinary incontinence
* Medically stable and able to participate in the study sessions

Exclusion Criteria

* Cognitive impairment or psychiatric conditions interfering with study compliance
* Active urinary tract infection
* History of urological surgery within the past 12 months
* Presence of implanted electrical devices (e.g., pacemakers)
* Skin conditions (e.g., ulcers, dermatitis) at stimulation or ice application sites
* Use of medications affecting sexual or urinary function within the past 3 months
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Islam Hassan Fayed

Physiotherapist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pending

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.