Mechanisms and Outcome-Prognostication for Paresthesia-based and -Free Spinal Cord Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT03852381

Last Updated: 2026-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-16

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) relies on stimulation of pain-relieving pathways in the spinal cord to treat chronic neuropathic pain. Traditional paresthesia-based SCS (PB-SCS) relies on providing analgesia through stimulation of spinal cord dorsal columns but it is often associated with attenuation of analgesic benefit and lack of acceptance of paresthesias. Recently introduced three different paresthesia-free (PF-SCS) modes of stimulation aim to overcome limitations of PB-SCS. Several questions regarding PB and PF SCS modes remain unanswered including the mechanisms of therapeutic benefit, criteria for selecting patients likely to benefit, and long-term outcomes. A concerted effort is required to understand and optimize utilization of SCS. This project has the twin goals of using neuroimaging techniques to understand mechanisms that underlies analgesic benefit from PB/PF-SCS modes and to identify criteria for selecting patients based on monitoring of pain and its related domains in patients undergoing SCS trials. Achieving these objectives will increase probability of analgesic benefit while minimizing adverse effects and knowledge gains from this study will be applicable to other therapies for chronic pain conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over 7 million Canadians suffer from chronic pain with 1 in 4 patients having neuropathic pain (NP), a condition caused by injury to nerves in the body. NP tends to have an extremely unpleasant character, severe intensity, and a persistent unremitting course. Conventional medical management (CMM) is often ineffective in relieving NP in majority of these patients. Paresthesia-Based Spinal Cord Stimulation (PB-SCS) has been used to treat NP but it has limitations in terms of preserving analgesic benefit and it is often associated with adverse effects. Recently introduced Paresthesia-Free SCS (PF-SCS), available at all tertiary level pain centers, has the potential to overcome these limitations but knowledge gaps remain in understanding and applying this modality.

The study design will be a prospective, exploratory study with randomization of order of no stimulation with novel modes of PF-SCS during the SCS trial and blinding of subjects (as per clinical standard of care) and outcome assessors. Participants with appropriate indications for trial of SCS with novel paresthesia-free modes will be enrolled. Baseline demographic and pain-related data including opioid intake in Oral Morphine Equivalents Per day in mg (OMED) will be collected. Pre-SCS trial neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG) and QST will be performed to establish parameters for future comparisons. Data on physical activity and sleep will be collected using actigraphy, as per standard of care. Data on pain and its related domains will be collected using validated questionnaires on the Manage My Pain app, in which all questionnaires administered are part of the patient's clinical standard of care. Ninety subjects will undergo a percutaneous trial of SCS that will last 12 days and the trial will be divided into three phases. All subjects will trial a conventional paresthesia-based SCS mode in the first four days of the trial. Subjects will then proceed the next four days (day 5-8) with no (placebo) stimulation, followed by one of the three novel PF-SCS modes (Burst, High Frequency, High Density) for the last 4 days of the trial. This process is currently adopted for all patients receiving SCS as standard of care. Neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG) and QST will be performed at the end of the SCS trial. Subjects who achieve significant reduction in pain, disability and sleep disturbance questionnaire scores with one of the novel PF-SCS modes will be offered percutaneous implantation of SCS system 4 to 6 weeks after the end of the trial using the novel PF-SCS mode they experienced during the trial. MEG and QST will be performed and data from validated questionnaires on the Manage My Pain app will be collected at 6 months after implantation.

Use of fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging), MEG (Magnetoencephalography), and QST (Quantitative Sensory Testing) in this study will help improve understanding of the alteration in brain in NP and the analgesic action of PB/PF-SCS. Validation of wearable technology and of app-based digital platforms will allow these available but infrequently-used modalities to improve success of analgesic treatments in patients with chronic pain. Healthcare systems will benefit through efficient use of resources to treat chronic pain made possible by understanding what works, who does it work for, and how to predict analgesic benefit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal Cord Stimulation

At baseline, the following data will be recorded: standard-of-care questionnaire scores, neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG), psychophysical testing (QST), accelerometer sleep and activity data.

The trial will proceed as follows:

Day 1-4: Paresthesia-based SCS (PB-SCS)

Day 5-8: No SCS (placebo)

Day 9-12: PF-SCS

Neuroimaging and psychophysical testing will be conducted at the end of the trial, and will be assessed 6-months post-implantation of the SCS device along with adverse effects. A decision to implant the SCS system will be made based on reduction of patient pain intensity by 50% in PB-SCS and/or PF-SCS modes, but not with placebo SCS.

Based on the response in the trial, the patient will either not be a candidate for an SCS implant, or they will receive one of the four modes upon implantation (PB-SCS, or one of the three PF-SCS: Burst, High Frequency, High Density).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal Cord Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Paresthesia-based SCS(PB-SCS), with stimulating frequencies between 30 to 80 Hz that confer a tingling sensation. Three different paresthesia-free SCS (PF-SCS) modes that use frequencies in the range of 400-10,000 Hz include Burst, High Frequency stimulation at 1.2 kHz and High Density stimulation at 400 Hz.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal Cord Stimulation

Paresthesia-based SCS(PB-SCS), with stimulating frequencies between 30 to 80 Hz that confer a tingling sensation. Three different paresthesia-free SCS (PF-SCS) modes that use frequencies in the range of 400-10,000 Hz include Burst, High Frequency stimulation at 1.2 kHz and High Density stimulation at 400 Hz.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults, 18 - 80 years of age, with refractory neuropathic pain (as per clinical features and DN4 score \> 3/10) in back and or lower limbs for more than 3 months following lumbar spine surgery
2. Severity of pain \> 3/10 on NRS and ODI score for disability \>40/100; and
3. Pain refractory to conventional medical management tried for at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18 or age ≥ 80 years;
2. Previous trial or implantation of SCS system;
3. Procedural contraindications to SCS including extensive thoracolumbar spine surgery, moderate-to-severe central canal stenosis, coagulopathy, local or systemic infection;
4. Pregnancy;
5. Opioid dose \> 200 mg OMED;
6. Psychiatric or psychological disorder likely to impact perception of pain;
7. Inability to comply with the study interventions or evaluate treatment outcomes;
8. Mechanical spine instability as per flexion/extension lumbar X-rays;
9. Ongoing litigation issues related to the pain; and
10. Concomitant peripheral neuropathy or myopathy or central neuropathic pain (e.g. post-stroke pain).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MSH-UHN AMO Innovation Fund

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anuj Bhatia

Director, Anesthesia Chronic Pain Clinical Services

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anuj Bhatia, MD FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Anuj Bhatia, MD FRCPC

Role: CONTACT

(416) 603-5800 ext. 6136

Jamal Kara

Role: CONTACT

(416) 603-5800 ext. 6237

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Anuj Bhatia, MD FRCPC

Role: primary

(416) 603 5800 ext. 2308

Danielle Alvares

Role: backup

(416) 603 5800 ext. 3517

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Feigin G, Dana E, Bains V, Bhatia A. Evaluating patient satisfaction and perceived accuracy in questionnaires completed before vs. during a pain clinic visit. Pain Manag. 2025 Sep;15(9):571-576. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2529773. Epub 2025 Jul 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40623913 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-5864

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non-Invasive Stimulation for Improving Motor Function
NCT03592173 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Subthreshold SCS or BMT
NCT05169047 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Sensory Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT07095036 RECRUITING NA