Mechanisms and Outcome-Prognostication for Paresthesia-based and -Free Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT03852381
Last Updated: 2026-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-16
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic and Intractable Back Pain
NCT00370695
Paresthesia Free Spinal Cord Stimulation (PF-SCS)
NCT03670147
Optimized Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System
NCT00871819
Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation (Burst-SCS) Study
NCT03718325
A Novel Approach in Spinal Cord Stimulation: a Combination of Burst and Tonic Waveforms.
NCT03201705
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study design will be a prospective, exploratory study with randomization of order of no stimulation with novel modes of PF-SCS during the SCS trial and blinding of subjects (as per clinical standard of care) and outcome assessors. Participants with appropriate indications for trial of SCS with novel paresthesia-free modes will be enrolled. Baseline demographic and pain-related data including opioid intake in Oral Morphine Equivalents Per day in mg (OMED) will be collected. Pre-SCS trial neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG) and QST will be performed to establish parameters for future comparisons. Data on physical activity and sleep will be collected using actigraphy, as per standard of care. Data on pain and its related domains will be collected using validated questionnaires on the Manage My Pain app, in which all questionnaires administered are part of the patient's clinical standard of care. Ninety subjects will undergo a percutaneous trial of SCS that will last 12 days and the trial will be divided into three phases. All subjects will trial a conventional paresthesia-based SCS mode in the first four days of the trial. Subjects will then proceed the next four days (day 5-8) with no (placebo) stimulation, followed by one of the three novel PF-SCS modes (Burst, High Frequency, High Density) for the last 4 days of the trial. This process is currently adopted for all patients receiving SCS as standard of care. Neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG) and QST will be performed at the end of the SCS trial. Subjects who achieve significant reduction in pain, disability and sleep disturbance questionnaire scores with one of the novel PF-SCS modes will be offered percutaneous implantation of SCS system 4 to 6 weeks after the end of the trial using the novel PF-SCS mode they experienced during the trial. MEG and QST will be performed and data from validated questionnaires on the Manage My Pain app will be collected at 6 months after implantation.
Use of fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging), MEG (Magnetoencephalography), and QST (Quantitative Sensory Testing) in this study will help improve understanding of the alteration in brain in NP and the analgesic action of PB/PF-SCS. Validation of wearable technology and of app-based digital platforms will allow these available but infrequently-used modalities to improve success of analgesic treatments in patients with chronic pain. Healthcare systems will benefit through efficient use of resources to treat chronic pain made possible by understanding what works, who does it work for, and how to predict analgesic benefit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal Cord Stimulation
At baseline, the following data will be recorded: standard-of-care questionnaire scores, neuroimaging (fMRI, MEG), psychophysical testing (QST), accelerometer sleep and activity data.
The trial will proceed as follows:
Day 1-4: Paresthesia-based SCS (PB-SCS)
Day 5-8: No SCS (placebo)
Day 9-12: PF-SCS
Neuroimaging and psychophysical testing will be conducted at the end of the trial, and will be assessed 6-months post-implantation of the SCS device along with adverse effects. A decision to implant the SCS system will be made based on reduction of patient pain intensity by 50% in PB-SCS and/or PF-SCS modes, but not with placebo SCS.
Based on the response in the trial, the patient will either not be a candidate for an SCS implant, or they will receive one of the four modes upon implantation (PB-SCS, or one of the three PF-SCS: Burst, High Frequency, High Density).
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Paresthesia-based SCS(PB-SCS), with stimulating frequencies between 30 to 80 Hz that confer a tingling sensation. Three different paresthesia-free SCS (PF-SCS) modes that use frequencies in the range of 400-10,000 Hz include Burst, High Frequency stimulation at 1.2 kHz and High Density stimulation at 400 Hz.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Paresthesia-based SCS(PB-SCS), with stimulating frequencies between 30 to 80 Hz that confer a tingling sensation. Three different paresthesia-free SCS (PF-SCS) modes that use frequencies in the range of 400-10,000 Hz include Burst, High Frequency stimulation at 1.2 kHz and High Density stimulation at 400 Hz.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Severity of pain \> 3/10 on NRS and ODI score for disability \>40/100; and
3. Pain refractory to conventional medical management tried for at least 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous trial or implantation of SCS system;
3. Procedural contraindications to SCS including extensive thoracolumbar spine surgery, moderate-to-severe central canal stenosis, coagulopathy, local or systemic infection;
4. Pregnancy;
5. Opioid dose \> 200 mg OMED;
6. Psychiatric or psychological disorder likely to impact perception of pain;
7. Inability to comply with the study interventions or evaluate treatment outcomes;
8. Mechanical spine instability as per flexion/extension lumbar X-rays;
9. Ongoing litigation issues related to the pain; and
10. Concomitant peripheral neuropathy or myopathy or central neuropathic pain (e.g. post-stroke pain).
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MSH-UHN AMO Innovation Fund
UNKNOWN
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anuj Bhatia
Director, Anesthesia Chronic Pain Clinical Services
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anuj Bhatia, MD FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Health Network, Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Feigin G, Dana E, Bains V, Bhatia A. Evaluating patient satisfaction and perceived accuracy in questionnaires completed before vs. during a pain clinic visit. Pain Manag. 2025 Sep;15(9):571-576. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2529773. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-5864
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.