A Study to Investigate High-density Spinal Cord Stimulation in Virgin-back Patients

NCT ID: NCT03716973

Last Updated: 2024-11-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-09

Study Completion Date

2020-09-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will look into the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in reducing chronic neuropathic pain in patients who have not had previous spinal surgery. This will be assessed by comparing the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) questionnaire responses before and after the SCS intervention.

We will also investigate the effect of HD frequency parameters on the improvement of quality of life, sleep and any adverse events following the spinal cord stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditionally, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for patients with chronic neuropathic pain following back surgery (a condition known as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS)). Although the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) also recommends SCS for chronic neuropathic pain without previous back surgery, clinical outcome data is much needed in this patient group. Conventionally, patients receiving SCS are provided with tonic stimulation settings (where they feel tingling and paraesthesia); however newer methods include high-density stimulation (HD) that provides higher energy allowing the voltage to be reduced to subthreshold parameters, hence minimizing the tingling and paraesthesia. HD stimulation is widely offered to patients with SCS as part of routine clinical practice, although no known studies have yet investigated HD settings in patients with neuropathic pain without previous spinal surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of HD settings in patients without previous spinal surgery undergoing SCS. 20 patients without previous spinal surgery who are deemed suitable for SCS as part of NICE guidelines 159 pathway will be recruited for the study.

All patients have a trial of SCS where they will be offered HD settings. If successful (\>50% improvement in pain scores) they will be offered permanent implant. Those patients whose pain does not improve with HD settings will be further offered conventional tonic stimulation for one more week. Those patients who do not respond to both tonic and HD settings will be excluded and will not have permanent implant. This will also allow us to investigate the patient's preference between the HD neurostimulator settings and conventional tonic settings. We will also investigate the response to these stimulator settings on health related quality of life. Patients will complete quality of life questionnaires at Baseline, 1-month, 3-months and 12-months post-implant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Open label pilot study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High density programming

High density programming of spinal cord stimulator for paraesthesia-free therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High Density Programming

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients implanted with Medtronic spinal cord stimulator will have high density programming.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High Density Programming

Patients implanted with Medtronic spinal cord stimulator will have high density programming.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with diabetes or any underlying neurological condition.
* Patients known to have a condition that in the investigator's judgement precludes participation in the study.
* Patients who have received an investigational drug or have used an investigational device in the 30 days preceding study entry.
* Patients unable to comply with the study assessments and to complete the questionnaires.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Barts & The London NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vivek Mehta, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Barts & The London NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barts Health NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

011454

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.