Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
69 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-11-23
2021-12-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sedation and Analgesia Bundled Strategies Among ICU Nurses
NCT07132450
Study on the Decision Support System of Difficult Airway Evaluation
NCT06183060
Learning Curve of Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block: A Prospective Observational Study
NCT06708598
Evaluation of Oxygen Reserve Index According to Glasgow Coma Scale in Providing Oxygenation in Intracranial Surgery
NCT05953493
Exploration and Application of Intelligent Difficult Airway Assessment Scheme
NCT06626204
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A scoring system using three categories of consideration to classify any regional procedure is proposed. The following three categories, Critical, Intervention, and Assess (CIA) can be used to analyze any procedure to determine bleeding risk. A score of 0 or 1, was given to each parameter depending on whether it was absent or present. A total score can be range from 0 to 3. From this, the risk can be categorized based on the total score as low-risk (0), intermediate-risk (1) or high-risk (2 or 3).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Residents
We plan to distribute a survey to the Stanford anesthesiology residents to determine their assessment of the bleeding risk of nerve blocks. The survey will list the most common nerve blocks and ask the resident anesthesiologists at Stanford whether the block is low/intermediate/high risk based on a scoring system of location relative to critical structures, compressibility, and whether bleeding or hematoma would be readily apparent.
Survey
There will be no interventions for study participants. Participants will be asked to complete a survey.
Attending physicians
We plan to distribute a survey to the Stanford anesthesiology attending physicians to determine their assessment of the bleeding risk of several different nerve blocks. The survey will list the most common nerve blocks and ask Stanford anesthesiologists whether the block is low/intermediate/high risk based on their experience with nerve blocks.
Survey
There will be no interventions for study participants. Participants will be asked to complete a survey.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Survey
There will be no interventions for study participants. Participants will be asked to complete a survey.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stanford University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chi-Ho Ban Tsui
Professor-Med Ctr Line
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tsui BCH, Kirkham K, Kwofie MK, Tran Q, Wong P, Chin KJ, Sondekoppam RV. Practice advisory on the bleeding risks for peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blockade: evidence review and expert consensus. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;66(11):1356-1384. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01466-w. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
Tsui BCH. A systematic approach to scoring bleeding risk in regional anesthesia procedures. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:69-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 15. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
48095
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.