Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
510 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-03-06
2020-03-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
HYPOTHESIS: In trauma patients with absence of neurologic defects, the addition of comprehensive CT does not change overall clinical management.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pelvic CT Imaging in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
NCT01828749
Is Computed Tomography Associated With Survival in Adult Trauma Patients in an Urban Lower-middle Income Setting?
NCT03450538
A Multicenter, Randomized Study of Early Assessment by CT Scanning in Severely Injured Trauma Patients
NCT01523626
Developing a Decision Instrument to Guide Abdominal-pelvic CT Imaging of Blunt Trauma Patients
NCT04937868
Optimized Camera-based Patient Positioning in CT
NCT05135208
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Outcome: Percentage of trauma patients with no known neurologic deficits who underwent a CT, any clinically impactful CT findings.
Secondary Outcome: Percentage of benefits CT provides in clinical features, clinical outcomes, injury severity score, GCS, age, sex, ethnicity, cause of injury, mechanism of injury, hospital length of stay, operative vs. non-operative, discharge disposition, radilogy, pathology results and images, any additional morbidities, total cost, 30-day readmission rate, and morality. And when operation does occur, the types of operation and the resulting cost and length of stay.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pan-Computer Tomography
trauma centers use the pan-computed tomography (CT) scan (head, neck, chest, and abdomen/pelvis) for the evaluation of blunt trauma.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No localizing neurologic defect
* Any cause or mechanism of injury
* Comprehensive CT obtained
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Methodist Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph Amos, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
024.TRA.2016.D
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.