Patient and Physician Attitudes About Informed Consent for Emergency Department (ED) Computerized Axial Tomography (CT) Scans

NCT ID: NCT01174836

Last Updated: 2012-04-26

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 77 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2009-08-31
• Study Completion Date: 2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Hypothesis: The majority of Emergency physicians and patients do not feel that specific informed consent should be obtained for ED CT scans.

Secondary Hypothesis: Emergency attending physicians and residents will have similar attitudes about CT scan consent issues. Physician attitudes toward obtaining consent for CT scans will change after an educational program about the associated risks.

Detailed Description

ED residents and ED attendings who attend grand rounds will be given a survey and asked to anonymously complete the first portion before grand rounds (Figure 1, example A). The first portion will assess basic demographics, CT ordering patterns and experiences, and attitudes about informed consent. They will be provided with an educational program at grand rounds that reviews current literature relevant to CT utilization and consent issues. After the lecture they will be asked to complete the second section of the survey (Figure 1, Example B). Both portions of the survey will be simultaneously returned in a sealed envelope and placed in a collection box at grand rounds.

ED attendings who do not attend grand rounds will only be asked to complete the first portion of the survey (Figure 1, example A). Resident or attending consent to participate will not be coerced, and participation will be implied by completion of the survey.

Conditions

Attitudes About CT Utilization

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NA
• Intervention Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Primary Study Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Interventions

Educational session

Physicians will have a brief education session provided in powerpoint about the risks of CT

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Current ED resident and attending physicians
• An ED patient (or their surrogate) that is able to understand and respond in writing to the questions given.

Exclusion Criteria

• Anyone who declines to participate.
• An ED patient who is not able to understand questions or respond in writing to the questions given (and does not have a surrogate that understands questions and respond in writing to the questions given).

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Lehigh Valley Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Marna Rayl Greenberg

Director of Emergency Medicine Research

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

2009-0807

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id