Radiation Dose Audit Reports to Reduce Radiation Exposure From CT Exams

NCT ID: NCT01405066

Last Updated: 2022-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to quantify variation in radiation dose levels across CT technologists, and determine the effectiveness of combining radiation dose audit reports and an educational seminar as a means to reduce the variation and level of patient exposure to radiation.

The investigators expect the radiation dose audit reports and educational seminar will lead to reduced radiation exposure to patients by making technologists more aware of the risks of radiation exposure from CT exams and identifying technologists with higher radiation exams compared with their peers.

The investigators expect the degree to which a technologist is concerned and aware about radiation exposure and cancer risk will be associated with adherence to radiation reduction protocols and the subsequent level of radiation their patients are exposed to when receiving a CT examination.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of advanced diagnostic imaging has increased dramatically over the past decade, not only contributing to rising medical costs but also exposure to ionizing radiation, of which CT imaging plays a prominent role because it requires a relatively high dose of radiation to produce an image when compared to conventional X-rays. The growth in the use of CT imaging along with all other advanced medical imaging has been well documented, and taken as a whole the use of these services has grown quicker than all other services provided by physicians. Research has also shown great variability in the amount of radiation exposure to individual patients, even when patient and other characteristics are controlled for. Given the increase in the use of CT imaging and the variability in radiation exposure between similar imaging exams, it is important to study ways of standardizing and reducing radiation levels from CT imaging. Little is understood about the role of CT technologists' attitudes and how they may influence patient radiation exposure, therefore, this project also give us the opportunity to survey the technologists and determine if there is a relationship between technologist attitudes and awareness and the radiation exposure of patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Decrease Variability and Amount of Radiation Dose From CT Exams

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dose Reports and Educational Seminar

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiation Dose Audit Reports

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Audit reports by CT technologist, with graphs of radiation dose levels of 20 exams from each of the 4 most common CT exams. Reports show the distribution of radiation dose levels by each exam type, and compares the technologist's dose levels to the overall levels from the clinic where they work and to the United Kingdom's 2003 Reference Dose. Prior to the graphs, the reports include an introductory page explaining the organization of the report and defining the dosimetry metrics. The final page of the report lists exams meriting individual review because their doses are higher than that of the clinic averages.

Educational Seminar: Radiation Dose Reduction

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Seminar led by a Radiologic Physicist and Radiologist. Discussion of the parameters associated with radiation dosage from CT exams and methods for changing these parameters to lower radiation dose.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiation Dose Audit Reports

Audit reports by CT technologist, with graphs of radiation dose levels of 20 exams from each of the 4 most common CT exams. Reports show the distribution of radiation dose levels by each exam type, and compares the technologist's dose levels to the overall levels from the clinic where they work and to the United Kingdom's 2003 Reference Dose. Prior to the graphs, the reports include an introductory page explaining the organization of the report and defining the dosimetry metrics. The final page of the report lists exams meriting individual review because their doses are higher than that of the clinic averages.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Educational Seminar: Radiation Dose Reduction

Seminar led by a Radiologic Physicist and Radiologist. Discussion of the parameters associated with radiation dosage from CT exams and methods for changing these parameters to lower radiation dose.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Group Health CT Technologist from Capitol Hill, Tacoma and Bellevue Clinics

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kaiser Permanente

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Diana Miglioretti, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Group Health Research Institute

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GroupHealthCoop Foundation2011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cone Beam CT for Breast Imaging
NCT01880580 COMPLETED
Rapid Examination of Acute CT
NCT06507124 COMPLETED NA