Performance of the Diagnostic Value of Bone Age Assessment Software Based on Deep Learning in Chinese Children

NCT ID: NCT05137301

Last Updated: 2023-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-21

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

High accuracy and precision bone age assessment is very important for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of various pediatric diseases. The commonly used bone age assessment methods include GP atlas, TW3 score and Zhonghua 05. GP method is to compare wrist X-ray films with atlas reference X-ray films. Its main disadvantages are strong subjectivity and long atlas standard interval. Different from GP method, TW3 method is to grade and score each bone, add each epiphyseal score to calculate the total score of bone maturity, and obtain the corresponding final bone age value. Although TW3 scoring method is relatively accurate, it is complex and time-consuming, and there is great variability among evaluators. In order to evaluate bone age more efficiently and accurately, a method based on computer image automatic recognition technology can help to overcome these problems.

In this study, 1000 children aged 1-18 in 5 hospitals are selected as the research objects. After taking bone age films with bone age instrument, the film reading results and evaluation time of AI Group, artificial group and standard group are recorded. One month later, the artificial group re-analyzes 1000 films with the assistance of AI system, and the evaluation time is recorded. Finally, the accuracy and time difference of artificial group, AI Group, artificial combined AI Group and standard group are compared.

The purpose of this study is to use the most advanced artificial intelligence deep learning bone age evaluation software to explore the value of bone age instrument to improve the accuracy and diagnostic efficiency of bone age evaluation by pediatricians.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Study subjects: Radiographs of the left wrist of 1000 children aged 1-18 years who underwent bone age measurement at 5 hospitals were selected
2. Research methods:

2.1 general information: name, gender, actual age, height, weight, BMI, race, disease type 2.2 main instrument: artificial intelligence X-ray bone age instrument 2.3 scanning scheme: Left posterior and anterior radiographs 2.4 bone age evaluation method and group 2.4.1 the standard group:Tw3-RUS and TW3-CARPAL were used to evaluate the left hand bone age tablets by the 5 pediatric doctors designated in the TW3 system training. There was no time limit for reading the tablets. The mean value of the evaluation results of the 5 doctors was taken as the final reference standard.

2.4.2 Grouping of bone age assessment ① artificial group (5 assessors assess bone age separately) ② AI Group③ artificial + AI Group (artificial Group assesses bone age with the assistance of AI intelligent software assessment) After taking bone age films with bone age instrument, the film reading results and evaluation time of AI Group, artificial group and standard group are recorded. One month later, the artificial group re-analyzes 1000 films with the assistance of AI system, and the evaluation time is recorded. Finally, the accuracy and time difference of artificial group, AI Group, artificial combined AI Group and standard group are compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endocrine Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

X-ray bone age instrument

Bone age films were taken by X-ray bone age instrument

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Children aged 1 to 18 years.
2. Clinical diagnosis of requiring bone age examination.

Exclusion Criteria

1. There are obstructions or implants in the wrist bone, such as metal.
2. Poor resolution, which affects the observation of bone characteristics.
3. Poor shooting position of the wrist due to various reasons.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tongji Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xiaoping Luo

Director of Pediatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

xiumin wang, director

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shanghai Children's Medical Center

xinran cheng, director

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chendu Women's and children's central hospital

xiaobo chen, director

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of The Capital Institute of Pediatrics

ZE SU, director

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shenzhen Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College of Hust

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xiaoping Luo, director

Role: CONTACT

13387522645

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

xiaoping luo, director

Role: primary

13387522645

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GenSci-GD-21001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The BoDI (Bone Density Investigation) Study
NCT06117124 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA