Performance of the Diagnostic Value of Bone Age Assessment Software Based on Deep Learning in Chinese Children
NCT ID: NCT05137301
Last Updated: 2023-04-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-21
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, 1000 children aged 1-18 in 5 hospitals are selected as the research objects. After taking bone age films with bone age instrument, the film reading results and evaluation time of AI Group, artificial group and standard group are recorded. One month later, the artificial group re-analyzes 1000 films with the assistance of AI system, and the evaluation time is recorded. Finally, the accuracy and time difference of artificial group, AI Group, artificial combined AI Group and standard group are compared.
The purpose of this study is to use the most advanced artificial intelligence deep learning bone age evaluation software to explore the value of bone age instrument to improve the accuracy and diagnostic efficiency of bone age evaluation by pediatricians.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Automated Bone Age Estimation From Noncontrast Abdominal CT Using Deep Learning
NCT07162168
Artificial Intelligence Assisted Bone Age Assessment
NCT07121283
Bone Age Assessment in Children Using Ultrasound Compared to Wrist X-ray
NCT03123003
Developing a COMputerised Bone Age Tool
NCT02617901
A Study on Vertebral Bone Strength by Micro-CT-Like Image
NCT04954417
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Research methods:
2.1 general information: name, gender, actual age, height, weight, BMI, race, disease type 2.2 main instrument: artificial intelligence X-ray bone age instrument 2.3 scanning scheme: Left posterior and anterior radiographs 2.4 bone age evaluation method and group 2.4.1 the standard group:Tw3-RUS and TW3-CARPAL were used to evaluate the left hand bone age tablets by the 5 pediatric doctors designated in the TW3 system training. There was no time limit for reading the tablets. The mean value of the evaluation results of the 5 doctors was taken as the final reference standard.
2.4.2 Grouping of bone age assessment ① artificial group (5 assessors assess bone age separately) ② AI Group③ artificial + AI Group (artificial Group assesses bone age with the assistance of AI intelligent software assessment) After taking bone age films with bone age instrument, the film reading results and evaluation time of AI Group, artificial group and standard group are recorded. One month later, the artificial group re-analyzes 1000 films with the assistance of AI system, and the evaluation time is recorded. Finally, the accuracy and time difference of artificial group, AI Group, artificial combined AI Group and standard group are compared.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
X-ray bone age instrument
Bone age films were taken by X-ray bone age instrument
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinical diagnosis of requiring bone age examination.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Poor resolution, which affects the observation of bone characteristics.
3. Poor shooting position of the wrist due to various reasons.
1 Year
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Tongji Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Xiaoping Luo
Director of Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
xiumin wang, director
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shanghai Children's Medical Center
xinran cheng, director
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chendu Women's and children's central hospital
xiaobo chen, director
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital of The Capital Institute of Pediatrics
ZE SU, director
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shenzhen Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College of Hust
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GenSci-GD-21001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.