Developing a COMputerised Bone Age Tool

NCT ID: NCT02617901

Last Updated: 2020-01-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Greulich and Pyle technique (G\&P) is that most commonly used to assess bone age in children, particularly in the context of suspected skeletal dysplasia. However it has been shown not to be applicable to children of Asian and African ethnicity and may not be applicable to United Kingdom (UK) Caucasian children, who are now relatively more mature and larger than children of the mid 1930's (when G\&P was developed). It is generally agreed that updated standards are required for rapid and reliable bone age assessment. The development of such standards requires irradiation of normal children. To do this ethically, radiation exposure must be kept as low as possible. Two recent studies suggest that bone age assessment can be reliably achieved from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. As far as the investigators are aware, the Tanner \& Whitehouse (TW3) method, which is preferred by some (e.g. endocrinologists and nutritionists), has not been assessed from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans - although not the main focus of this study, because of its popularity amongst certain specialties, the investigators shall be assessing the TW3 method also. Modern techniques should not only be available as textbooks, but should also be available in digital (on-line) format and where possible integrated with hospital PACS systems. The investigators believe that their team has the required experience and expertise to successfully carry out such a project. Before conducting the required large cross-sectional study, the investigators must first confirm that DXA can in fact replace radiographs for bone age assessment in children; which is the objective of this current study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a small prospective feasibility study to be performed over a 12-month period.

Children booked for a left hand radiograph for bone age assessment (either in isolation or as part of a dysplasia skeletal survey) will be recruited. This will require a purposive sample of 2 males and 2 females from each of the following 5 age groups (\<5; 5 to 7; 8 to 10; 11 to 13; 14 to 16 years). There will therefore be a total of 20 children (10 males). Because the aim of the study is to compare results of DXA with those of radiographs in corresponding children, ethnicity of individual children will not be an issue; in other words the investigators are assessing the reliability of DXA not the reliability of G\&P or TW3.

Relevant clinicians will identify patients from appropriate clinics at Sheffield Children's Hospital. Only patients having a left hand radiograph for bone age assessment on the basis of clinical need will be approached. Age appropriate information sheets will be given to them, and the study briefly discussed. When they arrive at the Radiology Department for their left hand radiograph, an appropriately certified radiographer will seek informed consent and provided the left hand radiograph is actually performed, they will then also have DXA of the left hand and those over 6 years old will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire.

Researcher 1 will anonymise hand radiographs and DXA scans, such that corresponding patient images are not identifiable. Researcher 1 will also document patient age and sex, ethnicity and body weight and height (no other clinical information is required for the purposes of this feasibility study).

Researchers 2, 3 and 4 will independently assess all images using both G\&P and TW3. All observers will interpret a random selection of half the images (again independently) on a second occasion at least 2 months after the first; on both occasions the Images will be interpreted in random and varied order. Images will be read in two batches of 10 radiographs and 10 (non-corresponding) DXA scans for the first read and 5 radiographs and 5 (non-corresponding) DXA scans for the second read.

Statistical analysis is largely irrelevant for this small feasibility study. The investigators' main aim is to assess whether or not G\&P and TW3 can be reliably assessed from hand DXA images.

The concordance between 1) independent readings of the three observers for radiographs and for DXA (i.e. comparing modalities) and 2) individual observers for both occasions (i.e. comparing observer reliability for each modality) will be evaluated using interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients. The investigators will calculate the mean and standard deviation of the differences between DXA and radiographs and between observers.

Statistical analyses will be performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 21 for Mac (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Diseases, Developmental

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Recruited children

Children aged below 16 years attending the Radiology Department for a left hand radiograph in order to assess bone age on the basis of clinical need. There will be one male and one female from each of five age groups (\< 5 years; 5 to 7 years; 8 to 10 years; 11 to 13 years; 14 to 16 years).

Bone age will be assessed according to the Greulich \& Pyle and TW3 methods by 3 observers on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart. Recruited children will have intervention in the form of a left hand DXA which will be anonymised and from which the same 3 observers will independently assess bone age according to Greulich and Pyle and TW3 methods on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart.

Radiographs and DXA will be read in random and varied order.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Left hand DXA

Intervention Type RADIATION

All recruited children will have a left hand DXA scan which will be anonymised and from which 3 observers will independently assess bone age according to Greulich and Pyle and TW3 methods on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart.

Radiographs and DXA will be read in random and varied order.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Left hand DXA

All recruited children will have a left hand DXA scan which will be anonymised and from which 3 observers will independently assess bone age according to Greulich and Pyle and TW3 methods on 2 separate occasions at least 4 weeks apart.

Radiographs and DXA will be read in random and varied order.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DXA of left hand and wrist

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Children having a left hand radiograph performed to assess bone age on the basis of clinical need
2. Children and families who have given fully informed consent/assent
3. Children and families capable of reading and/or writing English

Exclusion Criteria

1\. Participants who might not adequately understand verbal explanations or written information given in English, or who have special communication needs
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sheffield

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amaka Offiah

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Investigator

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Sheffield, Sheffield (South Yorkshire District), United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mora S, Boechat MI, Pietka E, Huang HK, Gilsanz V. Skeletal age determinations in children of European and African descent: applicability of the Greulich and Pyle standards. Pediatr Res. 2001 Nov;50(5):624-8. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200111000-00015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11641458 (View on PubMed)

van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Robben SG, Hop WC, van Kuijk C. Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today? Pediatr Radiol. 2001 Oct;31(10):748-52. doi: 10.1007/s002470100531.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11685448 (View on PubMed)

Soudack M, Ben-Shlush A, Jacobson J, Raviv-Zilka L, Eshed I, Hamiel O. Bone age in the 21st century: is Greulich and Pyle's atlas accurate for Israeli children? Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Mar;42(3):343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2302-1. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22237478 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCH/14/010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The BoDI (Bone Density Investigation) Study
NCT06117124 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
3D Imaging of the Hip Using DXA
NCT00666640 COMPLETED
Osteoporosis in RETT Syndrome
NCT02110797 COMPLETED NA