Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
5000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-01
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Detection Rate of Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing MRI
NCT04398173
Cognitive Fusion Prostate Biopsy With Biparametric Magnetic Resonance in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
NCT05818631
MR Radiomic Features in Prostate Cancer
NCT04219059
Validation of a Machine Learning Model Based on MR for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer
NCT06773598
Fully Hybrid 18F-PSMA PET/MRI as One-stop Approach for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
NCT06305390
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the recent years Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the prostate and targeted biopsy have been shown to substantially improve detection of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer (PCa) Gleason Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). In fact, 2020 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend performing MRI before prostate biopsy in men with prior negative prostate biopsy as well as in biopsy naive men with a clinical suspicion of PCa. If MRI is positive, a combination of targeted and systematic biopsy should be performed. If MRI is negative, biopsy could be omitted based on the clinical suspicion of PCa and a shared decision-making with the patient. Such approach binds the decision to perform biopsy to the clinical suspicion of PCa to be determined using MRI, risk calculators, and biomarkers. While several risk calculators and biomarkers have been developed and are currently under evaluation, the 'MRI pathway' is supported by level 1 evidence but seems to be limited by the low to moderate inter-reader and inter-center reproducibility and the low specificity/positive predictive value.
Additionally, several techniques for target prostate biopsies have been described but recent studies found no significant differences among various methods of MRI targeted biopsy for csPCa detection.
The aim of this international multicenter project is to create a comprehensive database including multiple heterogeneous cohorts in order to explore inter-center differences in the accuracy of MRI, and define optimal strategies for selection of men who might benefit from biopsies.
Objectives:
1. To investigate variables (such as lesion size, lesion location, number of biopsy cores per lesion) affecting the Positive predictive value (PPV) of prostate MRI on lesion level and patient level.
2. To explore inter-center differences in PPV of prostate MRI and possible reasons for such differences on lesion level and patient level
3. To evaluated combined use of MRI with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and other clinical variables (such as age, race, history of prior negative prostate biopsy, use of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, family history of PCa/csPCa) in A. men with a clinical suspicion of PCa, B. men with diagnosed prostate cancer on active surveillance
4. To assess if there is an optimal cut-off of MRI suspicious scores and PSA density (PSAd) in each individual institution.
5\) to assess the impact of patient selection on biopsy rate and number of men who could safely avoid biopsy despite MRI suspicious findings in per center and pooled data analyses
Outcome:
Histological evidence of Clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa), defined as Gleason score 3+4 or higher.
Inclusion criteria:
* Patients who received prostate biopsy with a pre-biopsy MRI.
* Additional inclusion criteria will be project-specific.
Methods:
Deidentified data from each cohort will be collected in a RedCap HIPPA compliant Database. Each center is responsible for the deidentification of the shared spreadsheet. The data handling center will be the University of Foggia (Foggia, Italy) and datasets will not be imported until data transfer agreements are complete between the institution sending data and the data handling center.
Data analysis Retrospective analyses of multiple prospective single- and multi-institutional clinical trials and cohort studies. The analysis will be performed on per center level as well using pooled dataset and will include comparisons of MRI and clinical, blood variables in men who underwent A. target biopsy only, B. targeted and systematic biopsy, C. systematic biopsy only. Decision curve analysis will be performed to assess the biopsy strategy with the higher clinical benefit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prostate Magnetic resonance Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) uses a magnetic field, radiofrequency pulses, and a computer to produce detailed pictures of the organ. Prostate MRI evaluate the presence and extent of prostate cancer and determine whether it has spread around the organ
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ugo Giovanni Falagario
Urologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
university ospital: Ospedali Riiuniti di Foggia
Foggia, Apulia, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Falagario UG, Lantz A, Jambor I, Busetto GM, Bettocchi C, Finati M, Ricapito A, Luzzago S, Ferro M, Musi G, Totaro A, Racioppi M, Carbonara U, Checcucci E, Manfredi M, D'Aietti D, Porcaro AB, Nordstrom T, Bjornebo L, Oderda M, Soria F, Taimen P, Aronen HJ, Perez IM, Ettala O, Marchioni M, Simone G, Ferriero M, Brassetti A, Napolitano L, Carmignani L, Signorini C, Conti A, Ludovico G, Scarcia M, Trombetta C, Claps F, Traunero F, Montanari E, Boeri L, Maggi M, Del Giudice F, Bove P, Forte V, Ficarra V, Rossanese M, Mucciardi G, Pagliarulo V, Tafuri A, Mirone V, Schips L, Antonelli A, Gontero P, Cormio L, Sciarra A, Porpiglia F, Bassi P, Ditonno P, Bostrom PJ, Messina E, Panebianco V, De Cobelli O, Carrieri G; PROMOD Study Group. Diagnosis of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging in men treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):2967-2974. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04634-2. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OspedaliRFUrology01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.