Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
175 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-01
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to eliminate this reporting and sampling difference, The goal of this interventional study is to compare the effectiveness of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) Imaging routinely taken before biopsy with a single-center randomized and prospective study and prostate biopsies to be performed by the same urologist with the mapping technique created by a single genitourinary radiologist working in our center with standard cognitive prostate biopsy and to contribute to the literature Type of study: Clinical trial participant population: Male patients with elevated serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) or indicated prostate biopsy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) imaging and underwent Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) before the procedure Participants will undergo transrectal prostate biopsy with or without mapping, Researches will compare to see if the cancer detection rates differ
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study Comparing MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy
NCT02450266
PRostate Evaluation for Clinically Important Disease: Sampling Using Image-guidance Or Not?
NCT02380027
Fusion Versus Cognitive MRI Targeted Prostatic Biopsy
NCT05969704
Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
NCT05513638
Cognitive Fusion Prostate Biopsy With Biparametric Magnetic Resonance in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
NCT05818631
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the power analysis, 200 patients were included in the study with the prediction that the efficacy difference would be calculated as 5%. All patients will be randomized to two equal groups by the flip-flip method.
1. Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and reports of the mapped patients will be examined and cognitive prostate biopsy will be performed by looking at the map (Sample Figure 1,2) created by the same urologist and the same radiologist (Sample Figure 1,2). Standard 12 core (6 peripheral zones from both lobes) will be sampled and 4 extra biopsies will be taken from Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Category 3-4-5 areas in the mapping.
2. Based on the Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging reports and images, without mapping by the radiologist, only the standard 12 core (6 from each peripheral zone from both lobes) determined cognitively by the urologist and 4 extra biopsies from the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Category 3-4-5 areas described in the report will be taken.
And then the biopsy results will be compared to see the efficacy of mapping
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prostate Mapping Used
Those patients' Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging's have been assessed by a genitourinary radiologist to guide the surgeon who performs cognitive prostate biopsy
Performing cognitive prostate biopsy with a radiologist's guidance with map
All patients will undergo prostate biopsy under local or general anesthesia with transrectal ultrasonography by a single surgeon after mapping extracted by a single genitourinary radiologist in the Department of Radiology of our hospital.
Prostate Mapping not Used
Those patients' Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging's have not been assessed by a genitourinary radiologist to guide the surgeon who performs cognitive prostate biopsy. Surgeon assesses the Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging's by him/herself
Performing cognitive prostate biopsy without a radiologist's guidance with map
All patients will undergo cognitive prostate biopsy under local or general anesthesia with transrectal ultrasonography by a single surgeon after reported by a single genitourinary radiologist in the Department of Radiology of our hospital.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Performing cognitive prostate biopsy with a radiologist's guidance with map
All patients will undergo prostate biopsy under local or general anesthesia with transrectal ultrasonography by a single surgeon after mapping extracted by a single genitourinary radiologist in the Department of Radiology of our hospital.
Performing cognitive prostate biopsy without a radiologist's guidance with map
All patients will undergo cognitive prostate biopsy under local or general anesthesia with transrectal ultrasonography by a single surgeon after reported by a single genitourinary radiologist in the Department of Radiology of our hospital.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indicated prostate biopsy by MR imaging and underwent Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging before the procedure
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who cannot enter Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging for various reasons (such as Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging incompatible pacemaker, Chronic Kidney Disease)
* Patients with diagnosed prostate cancer and active surveillance
* Patients without indication for prostate biopsy
* Patients with very high serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels (\>15)
* Patients who are planned to start treatment by diagnosing with standard 12 core biopsy without losing time with imaging method
* Patients who do not want to participate in the study.
40 Years
90 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marmara University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tarik Emre Sener
Associating Professor, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Haydar Kamil Cam, Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Marmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Bell KJ, Del Mar C, Wright G, Dickinson J, Glasziou P. Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: A systematic review of autopsy studies. Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;137(7):1749-57. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29538. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
Jansson KF, Akre O, Garmo H, Bill-Axelson A, Adolfsson J, Stattin P, Bratt O. Concordance of tumor differentiation among brothers with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2012 Oct;62(4):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
Lendinez-Cano G, Ojeda-Claro AV, Gomez-Gomez E, Morales Jimenez P, Flores Martin J, Dominguez JF, Amores J, Cozar JM, Bachiller J, Juarez A, Linares R, Garcia Galisteo E, Alvarez Ossorio JL, Requena Tapia MJ, Moreno Jimenez J, Medina Lopez RA; AEU-PIEM/2018/000 Investigators. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in the detection of high-grade prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent the Select MDx test. Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):857-865. doi: 10.1002/pros.24182. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
Oerther B, Engel H, Bamberg F, Sigle A, Gratzke C, Benndorf M. Cancer detection rates of the PI-RADSv2.1 assessment categories: systematic review and meta-analysis on lesion level and patient level. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Feb;25(2):256-263. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00417-1. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
Barkovich EJ, Shankar PR, Westphalen AC. A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):847-854. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20571. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Presti JC Jr. Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough? Urol Oncol. 2003 Mar-Apr;21(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(03)00006-1.
Wegelin O, Exterkate L, van der Leest M, Kummer JA, Vreuls W, de Bruin PC, Bosch JLHR, Barentsz JO, Somford DM, van Melick HHE. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MAR.UAD.006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.