Impact of Interictal Epileptiform Activity on Some Cognitive Domains in Newly Diagnosed Epileptic Patients

NCT ID: NCT05068323

Last Updated: 2021-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-30

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Epilepsy is a common health problem worldwide. In general population, studies in developed countries estimated the annual incidence of epilepsy to be\~50 per 100,000 and prevalence to be \~8.2 per 1,000. These figures are higher in developing countries in which prevalence of \>10 per 1,000 was reported. In Upper Egypt, Assiut Governorate, the prevalence rate was 12.9 per 1,000.

In people with epilepsy there is an associated high rate of cognitive difficulties that compromise educational progress and achievement throughout life. Approximately 1-5% of the population exhibits epileptiform discharges on electroencephalography (EEG). Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), meaning spikes, polyspikes, sharp waves, or spike and slow-wave complexes without observed clinical seizures, are commonly observed in patients with epilepsy.

Epilepsy syndromes manifesting with IEDs are detrimental to cognitive function. Recently, two studies found that frequent IEDs can impair cognitive performance in children. and adult patients. Several studies indicated that IEDs in patients with epilepsy had a disruptive effect on information processing speed with even a low percentage of IEDs (1%).However, it is unclear whether IEDs are associated with disrupted academic performance in patients with idiopathic epilepsy, and the relationship between general cognitive ability and academic performance in those patients has not been clarified.

Understanding how IEDs interfere with neurocognitive outcomes is important ,while the goal of medical and surgical treatments for epilepsy is to achieve seizure-freedom with minimal morbidity, the benefits of IED suppression are more controversial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to

1. Evaluate the influence of interictal epileptiform activity per se on some cognitive functions in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy (before using anti-seizure medications)
2. Determine different effects among different brain areas (producing epileptiform activity) on specific cognitive domains Type of the study: Case control Study Study Setting: Assiut university hospital -Neuropsychiatry hospital- Out patient clinics.

Study subjects: Will include epilepsy patients that diagnosed according to the International League Against Epilepsy criteria, 2017:

Study tools All patients included in this study will be subjected to: -

1. History taking including Personal history, history of present illness, therapeutic history, past history and family history
2. Complete physical examination. 3) Neurological examination. 4) Digital electroencephalography (EEG) for an hour (16 channels). 5) Psychiatric assessment: all subjects included in the study will be asked to perform a series of psychological tests done by expert psychologist to detect cognitive impairment

1. Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA).
2. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cognitive Impairment Epilepsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

case control
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epilepsy

Newly diagnosed epileptic patients

Group Type OTHER

Digital electroencephalography (EEG) for an hour (16 channels)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Digital electroencephalography (EEG) for an hour (16 channels)

Control

healthy subjects

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Digital electroencephalography (EEG) for an hour (16 channels)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Digital electroencephalography (EEG) for an hour (16 channels)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Digital electroencephalography (EEG) for an hour (16 channels)

Digital electroencephalography (EEG) for an hour (16 channels)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- a) Patients \[with age ranges from 10 to 50 years\] of both sex. b) Patients with confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic localization-related or generalized epilepsy.

c) Either before receiving anti-epileptic drugs or on regular treatment with antiepileptic drugs for less three months.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with symptomatic or secondary epilepsies either due to general medical conditions or drug induced.
2. Other neurological , psychiatric or metabolic disorders that affect cognition.
3. Regular use of antiepileptic medications more than three months.
4. utilization of regular medications other than AEDs that affect cognition.
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shady Mohamed Safwat Hassan

Lecturer of Neurology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shady Mohamed Safwat Mohamed Tawfik Hassan

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shady Mohamed Safwat Mohamed T Hassan, MD

Role: CONTACT

00201008763141

Mohamed Abdelmegid

Role: CONTACT

0882080150

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Epilepsy and Cognition

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Human Intracranial Electrophysiology
NCT05529264 RECRUITING NA
Neural Basis of Cognition
NCT05132543 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA