Effectiveness of the Social-Emotional Prevention Program Enhanced Version
NCT ID: NCT05057728
Last Updated: 2023-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
398 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-10
2022-06-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypotheses for the current study are put forward for child- and parent-related outcomes. First, for the SEP+ effects for child-related outcomes, the investigators expect that: 1) intervention group children will be rated significantly higher on measures of social-emotional competencies (social skills and positive emotion regulation strategies (ER)) compared to children from the wait-list control group (primary outcomes); and 2) children assigned to the intervention will be rated significantly lower on externalizing, as well as internalizing problems (primary outcomes). In addition, for parent-related outcomes the hypotheses are: 1) intervention group parents will report significantly more positive parenting practices, and coparenting support, as well as significantly fewer negative parenting practices, coparenting undermining, and parenting stress compared to control group parents (secondary outcomes); and 2) intervention group parents will report significantly more positive coping strategies with children's negative emotions and adaptive ER strategies, as well as fewer negative coping strategies with children's negative emotions and less maladaptive ER strategies in comparison with control group parents (secondary outcomes).
Additionally, the investigators aim to test potential intervention mechanisms. First, in the case of child-related outcomes, it is expected that children's use of adaptive ER strategies will mediate the intervention's effect on externalizing/internalizing problems; in a similar vein, it is hypothesized that improved social skills will mediate the intervention's effect on children's externalizing/internalizing problems. Furthermore, moderator effects of gender on adaptive emotion regulation strategies and externalizing problems will be tested.
For the parenting intervention, it is expected that program's effect on positive parenting practices and stress will be mediated by the use of positive coping strategies, parental ER and coparenting support. Also, coparenting undermining and parental reported adverse events are hypothesized to moderate the intervention's effectiveness on parenting practices, parental stress, and parent ER/coping.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effectiveness of a Classroom-based Intervention Promoting a Prosocial Classroom Climate in Children
NCT05891067
The Effects of Group Social Work Intervention on Children's Emotional Intelligence, Emotion Regulation Skills and Empathy Tendencies
NCT07273786
Supporting Social and Emotional Competence in Preschool Children
NCT04512157
Body-oriented Interventions on Preschoolers' Social-emotional Competence
NCT05729815
Social and Emotional Learning in Norwegian Kindergarten
NCT06975267
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As the SEP+ is comprised of multiple interventions, monitoring procedures will be employed for all components. First, regarding the implementation of the classroom curriculum, teachers will be required to fill out a self-monitoring implementation form, which will include children's attendance rates, number of implemented classroom activities, and teachers' use of intervention methods. In addition, teachers will be required to provide access to the research team to 25% filmed classroom activities. The quality of implementation for each activity by two independent raters. The teacher training will be conducted with approximately 12-15 participants in each group. Teachers will be required to participate in all 6 training sessions. Fidelity of implementation in accordance with the facilitator's manual will be conducted for half of the sessions (from sessions 2 to 5) by two independent raters based on video recordings of these sessions. Checklists will contain items describing facilitators' ability to implement specific methods of training, as well as their skills regarding group management and ways to support teachers' use of learned strategies in delivering the classroom curriculum. The parent training will also consist of 6 sessions, which will be delivered to groups of 8-10 parents. For each parent training, group fidelity checks will be conducted for 50% of the parent training sessions (sessions 2 to 5) by two independent raters based on videotaped recordings. Similar to the teacher training, facilitators will be assessed on their ability to deliver each training method according to the manual, as well as their interaction and communication skills with parents.
Approximately 30 classrooms will be recruited for the purposes of the current study. Given an expected rate of 15-30% dropout form pre- to post-intervention and that some parents might not provide consent for children to participate, the investigators estimate that the final sample will include a total of approximately 250-300 participants. A GPower a priori sample size estimation for a medium effect size, a significance level of .05 and power of .80 suggests that 41 participants are required in each group.
Data for the current study will be collected online employing Google Forms and all items will be marked mandatory to reduce the likelihood of missing data from each set of parent- and teacher-rated questionnaires. In order to handle missing data an iterative Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMR) method will be employed.
For the purposes of the current study two types of analyses will be conducted: 1) for the effectiveness of the universal intervention (for all children in the sample), and 2) for the indicated intervention levels (children who score above the cutoff (T score \> 67) on the Externalizing Problems score on the Child Behavior Checklist and the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form. For the universal intervention multi-level mixed models controlling for clustering effects will be conducted to test the intervention's effectiveness and moderator effects. Additionally, mediator effects will be tested employing multi-level meditation models in MPlus. For the indicated intervention, mixed ANOVAs will be conducted for assessing SEP+ effectiveness. Moderator and mediator effects will be assessed employing Model 1 and Model 4 from the Process add-on for Statistical Package for Social Sciences.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group (SEP+)
SEP+ is designed as a multi-focused (child, teacher, parent) school-based intervention, which can be employed as either a universal (i.e. targeting all children) or an indicated prevention program (i.e. targeting specifically children at risk for behavior problems). The SEP+ intervention comprises three types of intervention: 1) the classroom-based intervention in the form of a curriculum of 43 activities (2-3 activities/week) delivered over 4-months aimed at developing social-emotional skills; 2) a 6-sessions (2-2.5h/session) teacher training focused on increasing the use of positive discipline strategies and developing coaching skills for supporting children's social-emotional learning; and 3) a 6 sessions parent training (1.5.-2h/session) aiming to teach ways to manage parenting stress, to increase parent-child quality time, support children's emotion regulation and problem-solving, as well as increase positive discipline strategies.
Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version
The intervention is provided for all children for whom parental consent is obtained. The intervention includes a classroom curriculum, teacher training and parent training.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version
The intervention is provided for all children for whom parental consent is obtained. The intervention includes a classroom curriculum, teacher training and parent training.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* child age between 4.5-6 years at the time of participant recruitment
* children classified at risk for externalizing problems, based on their score (cutoff T \> 67) on the Externalizing Problems scale from the CBCL, and C-TRF respectively (for statistical analyses in relation to the indicated intervention)
Exclusion Criteria
* child's age below 4.5 years or over 6 years at the time of participant recruitment
* children classified not at risk based on their score (cutoff T \< 67) on the Externalizing Problems scale from the CBCL, and C-TRF respectively (for statistical analyses in relation to the indicated intervention)
52 Months
72 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Babes-Bolyai University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Catrinel Alice Stefan
Lecturer, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Catrinel A Stefan, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Babes-Bolyai University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Babes-Bolyai University, Department of Psychology
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2019-0226
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.