Endoscopic Surgery for Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Multicenter Registry Study

NCT ID: NCT05041608

Last Updated: 2023-05-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

5000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-17

Study Completion Date

2024-12-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Currently, there is limited multi-center data on endoscopic surgery outcomes in western populations.

Evaluation of these measurement would help the investigators compare them to conventional treatment modalities within current tertiary facilities; and consequently help the investigators identify appropriate treatment techniques and improve clinical management of patients at Rutgers RWJMS.

The purpose of this retrospective registry study is to assess long term data on efficacy, safety and clinical outcome of Endoscopic Surgery within the gastrointestinal tract.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our tertiary-care institution performs clinically-indicated various Endoscopic Surgery procedures gastrointestinal indications in more than 800-1000 patients annually.

The study investigators would collect data on a large sample size of subjects undergoing various endoscopic resection procedures such as POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy), EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection), STER (Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection), NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), TIF (Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication), Endoscopic Fistula Closure, Endoscopic Suturing, Capsule Endoscopy and EFTR (Endoscopic full-thickness resection). Clinical metrics will be collected including procedure times, length of follow-up, specific tumor characteristics, resection method, pathology results, procedural complications, additional therapy required, and disease-free survival time.

Various endoscopic surgical procedures are less invasive than traditional surgery, have fewer side effects and provide better efficacy. Moreover, they can be available to patients who are ineligible for surgery or who have refused more aggressive surgical intervention.

They improve quality of life and extend survival duration.

Endoscopic surgery procedures can be an appropriate approach in many gastrointestinal disorders including early neoplasms, challenging adenomas or sub-epithelial lesions that requires the resection of the superficial layers, mucosa and submucosa, or full thickness resection of the tract wall.

Currently, there is limited multi-center data on endoscopic surgery outcomes in western populations.

Evaluation of these measurement would help the investigators compare them to conventional treatment modalities within current tertiary facilities; and consequently help the investigators identify appropriate treatment techniques and improve clinical management of patients at Rutgers RWJMS.

The purpose of this retrospective registry study is to assess long term data on efficacy, safety and clinical outcome of Endoscopic Surgery within the gastrointestinal tract.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Achalasia Gastric Outlet Obstruction Gastroparesis GERD Reflux Fistula Benign Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Subjects undergoing Endoscopic Surgery

These procedures include: POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for Achalasia, G-POEM (Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for gastric outlet obstruction, Z-POEM (Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's Diverticulum), EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection), STER (Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection), NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), TIF (Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication), Endoscopic Fistula Closure, Endoscopic Suturing, Capsule Endoscopy and EFTR (Endoscopic full-thickness resection).

Endoscopic Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

These procedures include: POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for Achalasia, G-POEM (Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for gastric outlet obstruction, Z-POEM (Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's Diverticulum), EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection), STER (Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection), NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), TIF (Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication), Endoscopic Fistula Closure, Endoscopic Suturing, Capsule Endoscopy and EFTR (Endoscopic full-thickness resection).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic Surgery

These procedures include: POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for Achalasia, G-POEM (Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for gastric outlet obstruction, Z-POEM (Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's Diverticulum), EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection), STER (Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection), NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), TIF (Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication), Endoscopic Fistula Closure, Endoscopic Suturing, Capsule Endoscopy and EFTR (Endoscopic full-thickness resection).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects undergoing Endoscopic Surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects not undergoing Endoscopic Surgery
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Advanced Endoscopy Research, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michel Kahaleh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Advanced Endoscopy Research, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Advanced Endoscopy Research, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shahid HM, Bareket R, Tyberg A, Sarkar A, Simon A, Gurram K, Gress FG, Bhenswala P, Chalikonda D, Loren DE, Kowalski TE, Kumar A, Vareedayah AA, Abhyankar PR, Parker K, Gabr MM, Nieto J, De Latour R, Zolotarevsky M 5th, Barber J, Zolotarevsky E, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gaidhane M, Andalib I, Kahaleh M. Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Two Commercially Available Single-Use Duodenoscopes: A Multicenter Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 1;57(8):798-803. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001752.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35997700 (View on PubMed)

Shah-Khan SM, Zhao E, Tyberg A, Sarkar S, Shahid HM, Duarte-Chavez R, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Directed Transgastric ERCP (EDGE) Utilization of Trends Among Interventional Endoscopists. Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1167-1177. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07650-1. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35947304 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro2020002798

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Endoscopy Quality Study
NCT03351790 UNKNOWN