Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
204 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-10-29
2021-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of trans-orifice endoscopic suturing therapy for revision of bariatric procedures as well as study the safety, efficacy, and durability of preventative fixation of GI endoprosthetics.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)
NCT05468008
Endoscopic Sutures For Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders: A Prospective Multicenter Registry
NCT02166125
Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders: A Prospective Multicenter Registry
NCT05127408
Endoscopic Surgery for Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Multicenter Registry Study
NCT05041608
Utility of OverStitch Sx After ESD
NCT04361227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic suturing therapy in preventative fixation of stents and bariatric revision.
To collect data on the common use endoscopic suturing therapy in other indications.
This prospective clinical study is a real-world registry and not a randomized controlled trial. Given the conditions commonly treated with endoscopic suturing and the potential lack of equivalent expertise in open, laparoscopic, and trans-oral surgical procedures at all centers, randomization of participants is not possible nor ethical. In addition, there are clinical scenarios where endoscopic therapy with surgical sutures, tissue sealants, and/or endoprosthetics may be appropriate and open and laparoscopic surgical approaches inappropriate from an ethical viewpoint. Given the multitude of currently available minimally invasive approaches to repair, it would be unethical to expose and randomize patients who are suitable for more minimally invasive approaches to a more invasive and inherently more morbid approach.
This outcomes study is external to the subject receiving the medical device treatment. Subjects will receive the medical device treatment regardless of study participation and the surgery is not part of this research. Subjects will be consented prior to their procedure, to obtain basic follow-up information. If the subject provides informed consent to participate in the registry, then site staff will follow the participant's clinical data for the period of the registry. Site staff may also contact the subject(s) during their standard clinic visit or via the telephone and obtain information on: overall health, specific events related to any subsequent surgical, endoscopic, or radiologic interventions, and hospitalizations.
The clinical data will be collected during usual procedure follow-ups. This will include recording patient demographics, medications, testing results, comorbidities, body mass index, and reason for clinical care visit. If during the follow-up period, the subject undergoes additional clinically indicated procedures or hospitalizations for procedure related indications then the site will submit this information to the registry.
All procedures and device use will be performed as clinically indicated and as directed by the treating physician. All information requested as part of this registry will be obtained from clinical data obtained as part of study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
no groups - observational study
no groups - observational study
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18+ years
3. Patient ASA classification I, II, III, including emergency cases
4. Patient willing to provide informed consent, cooperate with post-operative recommendations and follow-up assessment
Exclusion Criteria
2. Under age 18 years
3. ASA classification IV
4. Unable to provide informed consent
5. Unable to participate in follow-up assessments
6. Uncorrectable coagulopathy at the time of endoscopic suturing
7. Any terminal disease that limits patient's survival to less than one year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.
INDUSTRY
American Gastroenterological Association
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Maranki, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Penn State Milton S. Hershey School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Borland Grover Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins Medical Institution
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Northwell Health
Manhasset, New York, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ES Registry 2-682-101
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.