Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
4000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-08-25
2031-08-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
BIOMOV project aims to :
1. establish the clinical spectrum and natural history of these diseases,
2. understand the role of genetic and familial factors on the phenotype,
3. elucidate the molecular basis of these disorders and evaluate diagnostic strategies involving molecular tools for clinical and genetic management,
4. develop multimodal biomarkers both for physiopathological studies and for accurate measures of disease progression,
5. develop trial ready cohorts of well characterized genetic patients,
6. test new therapies either symptomatic or based on pathophysiological mechanisms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neurophysiologic Study of Patient With Essential Tremor and Dystonic Tremor
NCT03041714
Neural Correlates of Movement Disorders Associated With PRRT2 Related Paroxysmal Kinesigenic Dyskinesia - an Ancillary Study of AMEDYST Research
NCT06701851
Study of a Large Family With Congenital Mirror Movements : From Underlying Pathophysiology to Culprit Gene Identification PROJET " MOMIC "
NCT01075061
Brain Involvement in Dystrophinopathies Part 1
NCT04583917
A Retrospective Survey-based Multicenter Study to Delineate the Molecular and Phenotypic Spectrum of Epilepsy-dyskinesia Syndromes
NCT06585605
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
any ataxia and dystonia genes are involved in similar pathways. There are numerous arguments supporting a share pathogenesis including synaptic transmission and neurodevelopment .
Overall, there are a number of arguments for a shared genetic approach and biomarkers research for these inherited movement disorders:
* Evidence from a clinico-genetic approach: A combination of several movement disorders is often observed in the same patient with causative mutation in either genetic groups of spinocerebellar degenerations, dystonias or choreas.
* Evidence from neuroimaging: the current concept of networks disorders underlies the pathophysiology of these hyperkinetic movement disorders. Variable combination of functional and/ or structural alterations of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical, cortex-basal ganglia and corticospinal networks, and their complex interactions have been described in ataxias ,dystonia choreas and more complex disorders.
* Genetic diagnosis: deciphering diagnosis with wide range of phenotypes Even in times of next generation sequencing covering exomes and genomes, diagnosing spinocerebellar degenerations, dystonia and other hyperkinetic disorders remains a challenge as: i) the causative gene remains to be identified for a substantial share those disorders; the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance in known and potential novel disease genes often requires time-consuming functional analyses not available on a routine basis; ii) in many countries, including France, access to diagnostic whole exome and whole genome sequencing is still limited; iii) the proportions of abnormal expansions not seen in exome studies are frequent in spinocerebellar degenerations and need a technological development to identify them. Analysis of familial forms revealed a great heterogeneity of the phenotype within the same family in terms of age at onset, severity and clinical presentation. Moreover, this phenotypic variability is not explained only by the genetic heterogeneity but also by the underlying frequent exonic or intronic expansions of triplet or more complex repeats, and more recently by the discovery of genetic modifiers ; iv) for dystonia and hyperkinetic disorders, some of those disorders also include nonmovement disorders neurological (e.g. intellectual deficiencies, hypotonia at birth, immature motor control, deafness, visual defects) and non-neurological (dysmorphological features) symptoms and the movement disorders panels do not always include the genes involved in developmental disorders; v) among the dominantly inherited forms such as Huntington disease, the access to genetic testing procedures allows early preventive therapeutic interventions in premanifest individuals. There is a lack of clinical evaluation to tackle the efficiency of treatment and the need for biomarker development.
* Natural history and prognosis: need for quantitative, reproducible markers, sensitive to evolution Biomarkers search is ongoing in those pathologies. They are valuable in assisting diagnosis, have prognostic value, quantify disease progression and serve as outcome parameters in clinical trials.
These elements demonstrate the need to develop quantitative tools that are easy to use, reproducible and sensitive to disease progression in order to accurately determine the natural history of the disease. This lack of systematic knowledge impedes diagnosis, patient counselling and therapy development.
Overall: Identification of the underlying gene and its pathogenic changes or variant(s) contributes to precise diagnosis, genetic counselling and follow-up. Advances in molecular genetics have highlighted the genotypic complexity, justifying the need for rigorous clinical and para-clinical evaluation to establish relevant phenotype-genotype correlations. In dystonia and in spinocerebellar degenerations attempts have been made to classify the genes involved.
Molecular genetic analysis will make it possible to specify the correlations between phenotype and genotype in order to propose rational molecular diagnostic strategies based on the frequency and nature of mutations, taking into account the phenotype. Genetic analyses will have an impact in terms of public health since they will serve as a basis for guiding requests for molecular analyses in these pathologies. In addition, recent advances in therapeutic trials will need the careful selection of participants, mostly based on biomarkers, for successful testing of new therapeutical agents. Therefore, it seems essential that this cohort of patients be supplemented by a collection of biological material for genetic research.
BIOMOV project aims to : 1) establish the clinical spectrum and natural history of these diseases, 2) understand the role of genetic and familial factors on the phenotype, 3) elucidate the molecular basis of these disorders and evaluate diagnostic strategies involving molecular tools for clinical and genetic management, 4) develop multimodal biomarkers both for physiopathological studies and for accurate measures of disease progression, 5) develop trial ready cohorts of well characterized genetic patients, 6) test new therapies either symptomatic or based on pathophysiological mechanisms.
It is crucial to be able to establish a large cohort of patients whose genotype will be specified. Follow-up of patients at different stages of the disease will make it possible to collect the natural history of the disease in a descriptive manner, with prospects for patient management, since the prognosis in terms of loss of autonomy or disability will be better specified. However, the main interest of the proposed clinical follow-up is to be able to quantitatively describe the progression of the main neurological diseases. These data are absolutely essential for the future implementation of therapeutic trials. The number of patients likely to be recruited and followed up a unique resource for such a project
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical follow-up
Clinical Follow-up:
demographic data and history,
* Retrospective interview (collection of data useful for genetic studies): -disease history (for patients only);
* Family history - Neurological examination:
* Diagnosis Clinical examination;
* Rating scales specific to the pathology under investigation;
* Cerebral MRI (optional)
* Biological samples (optional)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Group of patients:
Any patient with inherited hyperkinetic movement disorders can be included in the study according to the following criteria:
Woman or man;
* Clinical diagnosis of inherited hyperkinetic movement disorders with or without a genetic diagnosis
* With or without familial history of the disease
* Age ≥ 7 years;
* Signed Informed consent by the patient or both of holders of the parental authority for minors, or by the le;gal guardian for adults under guardianship
Group of at-risk individuals:
* Woman or man;
* Age ≥ 18 years old;
* A first-degree relative of a patient with inherited hyperkinetic movement disorders
* OR a carrier of an identified pathogenic variant or expansion in one of the pathological gene variant involved in one of these diseases;
* Normal neurological examination; according to disease specific scales
* Signed Informed consent by the subject or by the legal guardian for adults under guardianship
Group of healthy controls:
* Woman or man;
* Aged ≥ 18 years old;
* Free of known neurological pathology;
* No significant neurological symptoms;
* Signed Informed consent by the subject
* Ability to undergo a skin biopsy
Exclusion Criteria
\- Person deprived of their liberty by judicial decision
Contra-indications to MRI examination\* (optional): metallic implant, pacemaker, artificial heart valve, brain vascular malformation, aneurysm clips, exposed by metallic fragments, artificial implants, peripheral or neuronal stimulator, insulin pump, intravenous catheter, epilepsy, metallic contraceptive device, claustrophobia,
Contra-indication to skin biopsy (optional):
* Taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication (see above),
* History of hemostasis disorders,
* Presence of hemorrhagic risk verified by a coagulation test
7 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Pitié Salpetrière
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP210069
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.