Functional and Structural Imaging and Motor Control in Spinocerebellar Ataxia

NCT ID: NCT02488031

Last Updated: 2019-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2019-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to investigate how the brain and motor behavior changes both in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia and healthy individuals, and to assess whether a therapeutic intervention reduces levels of uncoordinated movement and improves motor function in spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thirty individuals who have been diagnosed with either Spinocerebellar Ataxia - 1 (SCA1), Spinocerebellar Ataxia - 3 (SCA3), or Spinocerebellar Ataxia - 6 (SCA6) will be recruited for this study. Participants will be randomly assigned to a best medical management (BMM / control) group and an error-reduction group. All participants will visit the lab twice for testing one month apart. Participants in the control group will not train between the pre- and post-test time.

The error-reduction intervention will be a 4-week home-based program. Investigators will use a novel, custom designed computer interface. Participants will perform goal-directed movements with each leg to targets in a 3D virtual environment designed to emphasize accurate movements. The goal-directed leg movements (similar to leg press) will be performed seated and require hip, knee, and ankle joint control. Leg movement will be detected using the LeapMotion sensor (Leap Motion Inc. San Francisco, CA), a device that supports hand, and finger / tool motions as input, similar to a mouse, but requiring no contact. Spatial endpoint errors will be quantified in 3D space by comparing the endpoint location of the foot trajectory (extending from the big toe) and the virtual location of the target. Time endpoint errors will be quantified by comparing the timing of the foot trajectory and the required time to target.

The length of the intervention will be 4 weeks. Each participant will train 4 days a week for \~1 hour per day. Within a week the task difficulty will increase by changing the presentation of the target from a predictable to an unpredictable location, by increasing movement speed requirements and by changing target size. Targets will be made predictable by identifying them prior to the cue for movement onset (target turning green). Specifically, there will be a flashing dotted line around the target prior to the target turning green. Targets will be made unpredictable by not providing any indication of the target location prior to the target turning green. Movement speed will be quantified from the voluntary movement onset of the leg (no reaction time) to the movement end.The movement speed requirements will be increased within a week and participants will learn to execute faster movements from the feedback after each trial. The size of the target will be progressively reduced during the 4 weeks.

All individuals in the study will receive a pre- and post-test assessment using the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). The individual sections of the ICARS (e.g. Kinetic section) and SARA will be quantified.

In addition, leg dysmetria will be quantified using a custom-made goal-directed movement protocol. Specifically, participants will perform unloaded ankle dorsiflexion movements and attempt to reach a space-time target. The primary outcomes will be position and time errors.

Biomechanics of overground walking in SCA will be monitored using the APDM mobility lab (APDM, Inc. Mobility Lab, Oregon, USA). Participants will wear APDM's wireless sensors on the hands, legs, trunk and forehead and walk overground a distance of 7 meters for 2 minutes. APDM quantifies 80 common biomechanical outcomes of gait (e.g. stride length variability).

The neurophysiology of SCA will be quantified with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and motor unit pool activity. Brain activity will be quantified with task-based fMRI using a 32-channel head coil. During fMRI force tasks, ankle dorsiflexion will be measured from the most affected lower limb using customized fiber optic sensors, as has been done in the past. Real-time feedback of force performance will be provided to the subject. During the rest blocks, subjects will fixate on a stationary target but do not produce force. During task blocks, subjects will complete 2 second pulse-hold contractions to 15% maximum voluntary contraction(MVC) of ankle dorsiflexion followed by 1 second of rest. There will be 10 pulses per block. The knee will be supported by a pillow to flex the knee so that the forces applied by the ankle do not cause head movement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinocerebellar Ataxia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Error-reduction

The participants in the error-reduction group will participate in a 4-week home-based training intervention during the month between their pre- and post-test visits. During pre- and post- training visits, Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Purdue Pegboard, Brief Test of Attention, 6-minute Walk, Hand Grip Dynamometer, Physical Performance Function, Digit Span, SARA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck Depression Inventory 2nd Ed, Stroop and biomechanical gait analysis tests will be administered. Also biomechanical assessments of dysmetria and neurophysiological assessment of brain activity will be conducted to evaluate the impact of the training on SCA individuals.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Error-reduction

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During this time participants will use a novel, custom designed computer interface to perform goal-directed movements with each leg in a 3D virtual environment designed to emphasize accurate movements. Leg movement will be detected using the LeapMotion sensor and we will quantify time endpoint errors by comparing the timing of the foot trajectory and the required time to target.

The error-reduction intervention will be a 4-week home-based program. Each participant will train 4 days a week for approximately 1 hours per day. Within a week, the task difficulty will increase by changing the presentation of the targets to be more unpredictable and by increasing movement speed.

International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The ICARS is an assessment of the ataxia severity. The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores on specific movements and ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 being indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The SARA is an assessment of the ataxia severity. The SARA score is the total sum of the sub scores on specific movements and ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 being indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Ed

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This is a 21 question self-report inventory for measuring severity of depression.

Stroop

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test measures selective attention and cognitive flexibility through reading aloud of color names or color of the print.

Purdue Pegboard

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test consists of a series of timed hand coordination and dexterity tasks.

Brief Test of Attention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A cognitive test assessing focus and attention.

6-minute Walk

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test consists on a timed 6-minute walk test to evaluate how much distance is covered.

Hand Grip Dynamometer

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This tests measures hand grip strength.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test is used to assess cognitive abilities.

Physical Performance Function

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test consists of a series of physical activities used to evaluate speed, coordination, and ease of movement.

Biomechanical Assessments of Dysmetria

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Dysmetria will be assessed using a custom-made goal-directed movement protocol where participant perform unloaded limb movement tasks and attempt to reach a space-time target. During these task muscle activity is monitored using Electromyography (EMG) recording.

Neurophysiological assessment of brain activity

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Neurophysiology will be assessed by monitoring brain activity using Task-based fMRI and motor unit pool activity using a specialized EMG system.

Biomechanical gait analysis

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will wear APDM's wireless sensors on the hands, legs, trunk and forehead and walk overground a distance of 7 m for 2 minutes. APDM quantifies 80 common biomechanical outcomes of gait (e.g. stride length variability).

Best Medical Management

The participants in the best medical management group will undergo identical testing sessions (two visits one month apart) as those in the error-reducing group but will not receive the 4-week error reducing intervention. They will be administered the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) assessments and the following tests: Purdue Pegboard, Brief Test of Attention, 6-minute Walk, Hand Grip Dynamometer, Physical Performance Function, Digit Span, SARA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck Depression Inventory 2nd Ed, Stroop and biomechanical gait. Biomechanical assessments of dysmetria and neurophysiological assessment of brain activity will be conducted at both visits.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The ICARS is an assessment of the ataxia severity. The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores on specific movements and ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 being indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The SARA is an assessment of the ataxia severity. The SARA score is the total sum of the sub scores on specific movements and ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 being indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Ed

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This is a 21 question self-report inventory for measuring severity of depression.

Stroop

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test measures selective attention and cognitive flexibility through reading aloud of color names or color of the print.

Purdue Pegboard

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test consists of a series of timed hand coordination and dexterity tasks.

Brief Test of Attention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A cognitive test assessing focus and attention.

6-minute Walk

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test consists on a timed 6-minute walk test to evaluate how much distance is covered.

Hand Grip Dynamometer

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This tests measures hand grip strength.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test is used to assess cognitive abilities.

Physical Performance Function

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This test consists of a series of physical activities used to evaluate speed, coordination, and ease of movement.

Biomechanical Assessments of Dysmetria

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Dysmetria will be assessed using a custom-made goal-directed movement protocol where participant perform unloaded limb movement tasks and attempt to reach a space-time target. During these task muscle activity is monitored using Electromyography (EMG) recording.

Neurophysiological assessment of brain activity

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Neurophysiology will be assessed by monitoring brain activity using Task-based fMRI and motor unit pool activity using a specialized EMG system.

Biomechanical gait analysis

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will wear APDM's wireless sensors on the hands, legs, trunk and forehead and walk overground a distance of 7 m for 2 minutes. APDM quantifies 80 common biomechanical outcomes of gait (e.g. stride length variability).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Error-reduction

During this time participants will use a novel, custom designed computer interface to perform goal-directed movements with each leg in a 3D virtual environment designed to emphasize accurate movements. Leg movement will be detected using the LeapMotion sensor and we will quantify time endpoint errors by comparing the timing of the foot trajectory and the required time to target.

The error-reduction intervention will be a 4-week home-based program. Each participant will train 4 days a week for approximately 1 hours per day. Within a week, the task difficulty will increase by changing the presentation of the targets to be more unpredictable and by increasing movement speed.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale

The ICARS is an assessment of the ataxia severity. The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores on specific movements and ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 being indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia

The SARA is an assessment of the ataxia severity. The SARA score is the total sum of the sub scores on specific movements and ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 being indicative of the most severely affected outcome.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Ed

This is a 21 question self-report inventory for measuring severity of depression.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Stroop

This test measures selective attention and cognitive flexibility through reading aloud of color names or color of the print.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Purdue Pegboard

This test consists of a series of timed hand coordination and dexterity tasks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Brief Test of Attention

A cognitive test assessing focus and attention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

6-minute Walk

This test consists on a timed 6-minute walk test to evaluate how much distance is covered.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Hand Grip Dynamometer

This tests measures hand grip strength.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Montreal Cognitive Assessment

This test is used to assess cognitive abilities.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Physical Performance Function

This test consists of a series of physical activities used to evaluate speed, coordination, and ease of movement.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Biomechanical Assessments of Dysmetria

Dysmetria will be assessed using a custom-made goal-directed movement protocol where participant perform unloaded limb movement tasks and attempt to reach a space-time target. During these task muscle activity is monitored using Electromyography (EMG) recording.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Neurophysiological assessment of brain activity

Neurophysiology will be assessed by monitoring brain activity using Task-based fMRI and motor unit pool activity using a specialized EMG system.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Biomechanical gait analysis

Participants will wear APDM's wireless sensors on the hands, legs, trunk and forehead and walk overground a distance of 7 m for 2 minutes. APDM quantifies 80 common biomechanical outcomes of gait (e.g. stride length variability).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SARA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* DNA diagnosis of SCA1, SCA3, or SCA6
* phenotype consistent with the DNA diagnosis
* ability to walk 7 meters
* the age of 21-85 years
* capable of providing informed consent and complying with the trial procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Known recessive, X-linked or mitochondrial ataxias or any other type of ataxia
* Concomitant disorder(s) that affect ataxia measures used in this study
* Cognitive status on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment \< 24
* Patients who have any type of implanted electrical device (such as a cardiac pacemaker or a neurostimulator), or a certain type of metallic clip in their body (i.e., an aneurysm clip in the brain), and are not eligible for participation in the MRI portion of the study
* Individuals who are claustrophobic
* Women who are or might be pregnant and nursing mothers
* Individuals with psychiatric disorders or dementia, along with other neurological and orthopedic problems that impair hand movements and walking
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of South Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Evangelos Christou, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

David Vaillancourt, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Manto MU. The wide spectrum of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs). Cerebellum. 2005;4(1):2-6. doi: 10.1080/14734220510007914.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15895552 (View on PubMed)

Manto M. Mechanisms of human cerebellar dysmetria: experimental evidence and current conceptual bases. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Apr 13;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19364396 (View on PubMed)

Solodkin A, Gomez CM. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;103:461-73. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-51892-7.00029-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21827907 (View on PubMed)

Schmitz-Hubsch T, Tezenas du Montcel S, Baliko L, Boesch S, Bonato S, Fancellu R, Giunti P, Globas C, Kang JS, Kremer B, Mariotti C, Melegh B, Rakowicz M, Rola R, Romano S, Schols L, Szymanski S, van de Warrenburg BP, Zdzienicka E, Durr A, Klockgether T. Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: a study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Mov Disord. 2006 May;21(5):699-704. doi: 10.1002/mds.20781.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16450347 (View on PubMed)

Kawaguchi Y, Okamoto T, Taniwaki M, Aizawa M, Inoue M, Katayama S, Kawakami H, Nakamura S, Nishimura M, Akiguchi I, et al. CAG expansions in a novel gene for Machado-Joseph disease at chromosome 14q32.1. Nat Genet. 1994 Nov;8(3):221-8. doi: 10.1038/ng1194-221.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7874163 (View on PubMed)

Reetz K, Costa AS, Mirzazade S, Lehmann A, Juzek A, Rakowicz M, Boguslawska R, Schols L, Linnemann C, Mariotti C, Grisoli M, Durr A, van de Warrenburg BP, Timmann D, Pandolfo M, Bauer P, Jacobi H, Hauser TK, Klockgether T, Schulz JB; axia Study Group Investigators. Genotype-specific patterns of atrophy progression are more sensitive than clinical decline in SCA1, SCA3 and SCA6. Brain. 2013 Mar;136(Pt 3):905-17. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws369. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23423669 (View on PubMed)

Pasternak O, Shenton ME, Westin CF. Estimation of extracellular volume from regularized multi-shell diffusion MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 2):305-12. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_38.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23286062 (View on PubMed)

Pasternak O, Sochen N, Gur Y, Intrator N, Assaf Y. Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Sep;62(3):717-30. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22055.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19623619 (View on PubMed)

De Luca CJ, Adam A, Wotiz R, Gilmore LD, Nawab SH. Decomposition of surface EMG signals. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1646-57. doi: 10.1152/jn.00009.2006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16899649 (View on PubMed)

Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neuroscientist. 2004 Jun;10(3):247-59. doi: 10.1177/1073858404263517.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15155063 (View on PubMed)

Haines DE, Manto MU. Clinical symptoms of cerebellar disease and their interpretation. Cerebellum. 2007;6(4):360-74. doi: 10.1080/14734220701798199. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18041661 (View on PubMed)

Keller JL, Bastian AJ. A home balance exercise program improves walking in people with cerebellar ataxia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Oct;28(8):770-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968314522350. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24526707 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R21NS094946

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB201500202-N

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mirroring a Movement
NCT00123448 COMPLETED
The Role of Cerebellum in Speech
NCT03972202 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA