Outcomes of Bilateral Temporomandibular Joint Arthroscopy and the Role of a Second Intervention - Timings and Results

NCT ID: NCT05027243

Last Updated: 2021-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-02

Study Completion Date

2021-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthroscopy has been used successfully for intra-articular disorders. Until now, limited studies are available regarding the clinical evidence of bilateral TMJ arthroscopy for Dimitroulis 2-3. This prospective study investigated the efficacy of TMJ arthroscopy in patients with bilateral disorders, and also the need for a posterior surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthroscopy has been used successfully for intra-articular disorders. It was first introduced by Onishi at 1975, as a pioneering technique to treat painful joints and has been associated with a reduction in the number of open joints surgeries. This minimally invasive technique allows observation of the TMJ upper compartment tissues, and sometimes the lower compartment. Moreover, this intervention allows joint lysis and lavage (level 1 arthroscopy) and intra-articular surgical procedures (level 2-3 arthroscopy).

Recent studies updated that TMJ arthroscopy promotes a reduction in pain and inflammatory process and restoring the mandibular function with low morbidity. Moreover, TMJ arthroscopy seems to be also long-term effective for relieving TMJ symptoms. Until now, limited studies are available regarding the clinical evidence of bilateral TMJ arthroscopy for Dimitroulis 2-3. This prospective study investigated the efficacy of TMJ arthroscopy in patients with bilateral disorders, and also the need for a posterior surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bilateral Temporomandibular Joint Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Prospective study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

bilateral temporomandibular joint arthroscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bilateral temporomandibular joint arthroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The TMJ arthroscopy was performed with a 1.9-mm arthroscope including a video system, with a 2.8-mm outer protective cannula. Briefly, for TMJ arthroscopy level 1, the authors used the classic puncture with an entry point 10 mm anterior and 2 mm below the Holmlund-Hellsing (H-H) line. A second puncture with a 21-G needle was performed 30 mm anterior and 7 mm below the H-H line to wash the joint with 250-300 ml Ringer solution. After washing the joint, 1.5-2 cc of hyaluronic acid was injected into it. For level 2 TMJ arthroscopy, the second puncture was substituted by a 2.8-mm outer protective cannula with a sharp trocar until the joint was reached. The 2.8-mm cannula was used for (1) intra-articular coblation and/or (2) intrasynovial medication. Antibiotic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were routinely prescribed. Patients were instructed to follow a soft diet for 3 days after surgery and 5 physiotherapy and 3 speech therapy exercise sessions after intervention.

Xeomin® (Merz)

Intervention Type DRUG

For tenderness grade 2, 155U of Incobotulinum toxin A was injected in the masticatory muscles and for tenderness grade 3 195U of Incobotulinum toxin A was injected. The authors used Xeomin® (Merz) in all patients.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bilateral temporomandibular joint arthroscopy

The TMJ arthroscopy was performed with a 1.9-mm arthroscope including a video system, with a 2.8-mm outer protective cannula. Briefly, for TMJ arthroscopy level 1, the authors used the classic puncture with an entry point 10 mm anterior and 2 mm below the Holmlund-Hellsing (H-H) line. A second puncture with a 21-G needle was performed 30 mm anterior and 7 mm below the H-H line to wash the joint with 250-300 ml Ringer solution. After washing the joint, 1.5-2 cc of hyaluronic acid was injected into it. For level 2 TMJ arthroscopy, the second puncture was substituted by a 2.8-mm outer protective cannula with a sharp trocar until the joint was reached. The 2.8-mm cannula was used for (1) intra-articular coblation and/or (2) intrasynovial medication. Antibiotic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were routinely prescribed. Patients were instructed to follow a soft diet for 3 days after surgery and 5 physiotherapy and 3 speech therapy exercise sessions after intervention.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Xeomin® (Merz)

For tenderness grade 2, 155U of Incobotulinum toxin A was injected in the masticatory muscles and for tenderness grade 3 195U of Incobotulinum toxin A was injected. The authors used Xeomin® (Merz) in all patients.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \>16 years;
* clinical diagnosis of bilateral intra-articular disorder;
* clinical criteria for bilateral TMJ arthroscopy;
* magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessing the intra-articular derangement
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Portugues da Face

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Faustino Ângelo

Clinical Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Ângelo, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto Português da Face

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMJARTHRO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Functionality and Clinical Correlates in TMD
NCT06937502 NOT_YET_RECRUITING