Treatment in Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

NCT ID: NCT07171671

Last Updated: 2025-09-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of manual therapy applications on pain, range of motion and joint position sense in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis who have temporomandibular joint dysfunction. The 57 patients included in the study were divided into 3 groups by simple randomization. Group 1 received myofascial mobilization of masticatory muscles and group 2 received temporomandibular joint mobilization twice a week for 6 weeks. The control group received no treatment. The groups were evaluated twice, before and after treatment. The control group underwent a second evaluation 6 weeks after the first evaluation. C-ROM was used to evaluate cervical range of motion and joint position sensation, millimeter ruler was used to evaluate TMJ range of motion, Algometer was used to evaluate pressure pain threshold of muscles, Headache Impact Test-HIT-6 was used for headache, Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) and Jaw Function Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20) were used for temporomandibular dysfunction severity, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 was used for emotional state. In the cervical range of motion, the myofascial group showed significant normal range of motion improvements only in the flexion and lateral flexion directions, while no benefit was obtained in the extension and rotation directions. In the joint mobilization group, significant improvements were observed in all directions (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, rotation) (p\<0.05). In the evaluation of cervical joint position sensation, improvements in joint position sensation were observed in all directions in the joint mobilization group. In the myofascial mobilization group, limited improvements were observed in some directions, but most of the variables decreased (p\<0.05). In the measurement of pressure pain thresholds, a decrease was observed in the two treatment groups before and after treatment and compared to the control group (p\<0.05), while no statistically significant difference was detected in any variable in the comparison between the treatment groups (P\>0.05). Patients in the two treatment groups showed an increase in mandibular range of motion in all directions compared to both the pre- and post-treatment and control groups (p\<0.05), while no statistically significant difference was detected in any variable in the comparison between the treatment groups (P\>0.05). Joint mobilization and myofascial mobilization applications significantly reduced headache, anxiety severity and improved jaw function. There was a significant decrease in HIT-6, GAD-7, JFLS-20 total, JFLS-20 mastication, JFLS-20 mobility, JFLS-20 communication and Fonseca scores in both groups (p\<0.05), while no statistically significant difference was found in any variable in the comparison of treatment groups (P\>0.05). It was observed that myofascial mobilization and joint mobilization applications had positive effects on pain, mandibular range of motion, cervical joint range of motion and joint position sensation, jaw functions, headache and anxiety level in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis with temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of manual therapy applications on pain, range of motion and joint position sense in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis who have temporomandibular joint dysfunction. The 57 patients included in the study were divided into 3 groups by simple randomization. Group 1 received myofascial mobilization of masticatory muscles and group 2 received temporomandibular joint mobilization twice a week for 6 weeks. The control group received no treatment. The groups were evaluated twice, before and after treatment. The control group underwent a second evaluation 6 weeks after the first evaluation. C-ROM was used to evaluate cervical range of motion and joint position sensation, millimeter ruler was used to evaluate TMJ range of motion, Algometer was used to evaluate pressure pain threshold of muscles, Headache Impact Test-HIT-6 was used for headache, Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) and Jaw Function Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20) were used for temporomandibular dysfunction severity, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 was used for emotional state. In the cervical range of motion, the myofascial group showed significant normal range of motion improvements only in the flexion and lateral flexion directions, while no benefit was obtained in the extension and rotation directions. In the joint mobilization group, significant improvements were observed in all directions (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, rotation) (p\<0.05). In the evaluation of cervical joint position sensation, improvements in joint position sensation were observed in all directions in the joint mobilization group. In the myofascial mobilization group, limited improvements were observed in some directions, but most of the variables decreased (p\<0.05). In the measurement of pressure pain thresholds, a decrease was observed in the two treatment groups before and after treatment and compared to the control group (p\<0.05), while no statistically significant difference was detected in any variable in the comparison between the treatment groups (P\>0.05). Patients in the two treatment groups showed an increase in mandibular range of motion in all directions compared to both the pre- and post-treatment and control groups (p\<0.05), while no statistically significant difference was detected in any variable in the comparison between the treatment groups (P\>0.05). Joint mobilization and myofascial mobilization applications significantly reduced headache, anxiety severity and improved jaw function. There was a significant decrease in HIT-6, GAD-7, JFLS-20 total, JFLS-20 mastication, JFLS-20 mobility, JFLS-20 communication and Fonseca scores in both groups (p\<0.05), while no statistically significant difference was found in any variable in the comparison of treatment groups (P\>0.05). It was observed that myofascial mobilization and joint mobilization applications had positive effects on pain, mandibular range of motion, cervical joint range of motion and joint position sensation, jaw functions, headache and anxiety level in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis with temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatic Diseases Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Manuel Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Myofascial Mobilisation

Myofascial mobilisation treatment was carried out in three stages. In these stages, trigger point therapy was first applied, followed by myofascial release and finally the muscle energy technique for the masticatory muscles. The procedures were performed twice a week for six weeks. The sessions lasted an average of 30 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

manuel therapy and exercises

Joint mobilisation group

Joint mobilisation treatment was carried out in four stages. In these stages, caudal translation was performed first, followed by anterior translation, then mediolateral translation, and finally ventro-caudal translation. The procedures were performed twice a week for six weeks. The applications lasted an average of 30 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

manuel therapy and exercises

Control group

A second assessment was conducted six weeks after the first assessment. No treatment w

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

manuel therapy and exercises

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

exercises

manuel therapy and exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be aged between 18 and 65
* Have been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria
* Be in the chronic phase of the disease
* Have temporomandibular joint dysfunction according to the RDC/TMD criteria
* Have intact cognitive functions
* Individuals who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Maksillofasiyal travma ve cerrahi öyküsü olanlar
* Son 6 ayda ortodontik tedavi öyküsü olanlar
* Trigeminal nevralji ve/veya fasiyal sinir paralizisi öyküsü olanlar
* Romatoid Artrit dışında ek bir romatolojik hastalığı olanlar
* Ağız içi splint kullanıyor olmak
* Protez diş kullanımı ve molar dişlerde eksiklik
* Servikal bölgeye ve temporomandibular eklem disfonksiyonuna yönelik son 6 ayda Manuel - Terapi, enjeksiyon vb. benzeri tedavi görmüş olmak
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanko University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hakan Polat

director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sanko Unıversıty

Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

hakanpolat4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Functionality and Clinical Correlates in TMD
NCT06937502 NOT_YET_RECRUITING