Manual Therapy and Exercises Applied to Cervical Spine in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders
NCT ID: NCT01954511
Last Updated: 2019-09-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Jaw Exercise Program in Temporomandibular Disorders Patients
NCT02397070
Influence of Manual Therapy in Temporomandibular Joint Disorder
NCT02880774
Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders
NCT01187316
Thermograph Evaluation of Masticatory and Cervical Muscles After Physiotherapeutic Treatment in Tmd Subjects
NCT02822469
Effect of Manual Therapy on Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction
NCT07210957
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It's usual to observe that subjects with TMD also present cervical alteration. Beside this, cervical postural alterations produced by muscle tension can influence mandibular position.
The intervention protocol was based on manual therapy, stabilization exercises and stretching.
The technique are:.
1. Upper cervical flexion mobilization;
2. C5 central posterior-anterior mobilization;
3. Stabilization exercise: Cranio-cervical flexor stabilization exercise
4. Stretching of muscles: upper trapezius, scalenes, semispinalis capitis; splenius capitis, sternocleidomastoid
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Manual therapy
Upper cervical flexion mobilization, C5 central posterior-anterior mobilization, Pressure biofeedback device
Manual therapy
The patient was supine with the cervical spine in a neutral position. The therapist brought about a contact of the occipital bone with the first finger and medial aspect of the hand, and other hand over the frontal region of the patient's head. The mobilizing force was delivered by flexing the upper cervical region using a combination of cephalic traction with the occipital hand and caudal pressure with the frontal hand. This technique was applied for 10 minutes
Manual therapy
The patient was prone with the cervical spine in a neutral position. The therapist placed the tips of his thumbs on the posterior surface of the C5 spinous process, while the other fingers rested gently around the patients' neck. This technique was applied for 9 minutes
Pressure biofeedback device
Device: Stabilizer - Chattanooga Group Inc., Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA The cranio-cervical flexor stabilization exercise was done 10 times holding 10 seconds the flexing position graded through feedback from a pressure biofeedback device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Manual therapy
The patient was supine with the cervical spine in a neutral position. The therapist brought about a contact of the occipital bone with the first finger and medial aspect of the hand, and other hand over the frontal region of the patient's head. The mobilizing force was delivered by flexing the upper cervical region using a combination of cephalic traction with the occipital hand and caudal pressure with the frontal hand. This technique was applied for 10 minutes
Manual therapy
The patient was prone with the cervical spine in a neutral position. The therapist placed the tips of his thumbs on the posterior surface of the C5 spinous process, while the other fingers rested gently around the patients' neck. This technique was applied for 9 minutes
Pressure biofeedback device
Device: Stabilizer - Chattanooga Group Inc., Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA The cranio-cervical flexor stabilization exercise was done 10 times holding 10 seconds the flexing position graded through feedback from a pressure biofeedback device
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
25 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bruno Leonardo da Silva Grüninger
Pt
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ana Beatriz Oliveira, Phd
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Clinical professor - UFSCar
Letícia Bojikian Calixtre, Pt
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UFSCar
Francisco Alburquerque Sendín, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Salamanca
Melina Nevoeiro Haik, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UFSCar
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0300.0.135.000-11
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
U1111-1139-4055
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.