Comparing Intrathecal Morphine and Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion to Epidural Anesthesia With Postoperative PCA for Patients Undergoing Exploratory Laparotomy

NCT ID: NCT05017246

Last Updated: 2025-07-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-18

Study Completion Date

2024-08-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine if opioid consumption postoperatively among patients undergoing non-emergent laparotomy by the gynecologic oncology service who receive intrathecal morphine with intraoperative lidocaine (IML) infusion are lower than patients who have epidural anesthesia with PCA (EPCA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Debulking Enlarged Uterus Fibroid Uterus Adnexal Mass

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epidural bupivacaine with hydromorphone patient-controlled anesthesia (EPCA)

* Standard of care at Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital
* Day of surgery: preoperative tylenol, gabapentin, celebrex, and epidural dosing per standard protocol.
* Intraoperative: dexamethasone and epidural bupivacaine
* Day of surgery postoperative: hydromorphone PCA, toradol, ibuprofen, tylenol, epidural bupivacaine
* Postoperative: hydromorphone PCA, ibuprofen, oxycodone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

-Epidural bupivacaine 0.1% 2-6ml/hr based on MAP within 10% of patient's baseline MAP

Intrathecal morphine with intraoperative lidocaine infusion

* Day of surgery: tylenol, gabapentin, celebrex, and preoperative intrathecal morphine one time injection (150mcg)
* Intraoperative: dexamethasone and lidocaine infusion 1 mg/kg ideal body weight
* Day of surgery postoperative: toradol, ibuprofen, tylenol
* Postoperative: ibuprofen, oxycodone, and hydromorphone prn

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

-Preservative-free intrathecal morphine (duramorph) 150mcg injection (0.15ml or a 0.5mg/0.5ml prepared solution)

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

-Lidocaine infusion 1 mg/kg ideal body weight (IBW)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

-Epidural bupivacaine 0.1% 2-6ml/hr based on MAP within 10% of patient's baseline MAP

Intervention Type DRUG

Morphine

-Preservative-free intrathecal morphine (duramorph) 150mcg injection (0.15ml or a 0.5mg/0.5ml prepared solution)

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine

-Lidocaine infusion 1 mg/kg ideal body weight (IBW)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Duramorph

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patients ≥18 years old
* Undergoing non-emergent exploratory laparotomy with the Gynecologic Oncology service
* No clinical or laboratory evidence of end organ failure:

If available:

* Platelets \> 100 K/cumm
* Hemoglobin \> 8.0 g/dl
* Serum creatinine \<1.5 mg/dl
* Creatine clearance (CrCl) ≥30 based on the original Cockcroft-Gault formula adjusted for weight.
* INR \<1.3 reference range
* All other lab values obtained as part of general preoperative work-up must be ≤1.5x normal laboratory value.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not giving consent to participate in the study
* Unable to complete self-report pain questionnaire
* Moderate to severe kidney or liver failure per lab criteria as outlined
* Inability to hold anticoagulant medications for a safe amount of time per current ASRA guidelines
* Contraindication to lumbar puncture or epidural placement, per acute pain management service such as known coagulopathy or history of clotting disorders, history of scoliosis or lumbar fusion, infection at site of entry, or current systemic infection
* Complete bowel obstruction
* Contraindication to intravenous lidocaine
* No known pregnancy and not lactating.
* Currently septic
* Patient currently taking more than 30 MME a day preoperatively (for \>30 days)
* BMI \>50kg/m2
* Intolerance/contraindication or allergy to receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen or any other medications in the pre-operative order set
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Premal H Thaker, M.D., MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.siteman.wustl.edu

Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202105007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimizing Recovery in Abdominoplasty
NCT04254692 TERMINATED PHASE4