Liposomal Bupivacaine With or Without Hydromorphone for the Improvement of Pain Control After Laparotomy in Patients With Gynecological Malignancies

NCT ID: NCT04258631

Last Updated: 2024-10-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-09

Study Completion Date

2023-08-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase IV trial studies how well liposomal bupivacaine with or without hydromorphone works in improving pain control during the first 24 hours after surgery in patients with gynecological malignancies undergoing laparotomy. Liposomal bupivacaine is routinely infiltrated into the skin surrounding the abdominal incision, and is effective in providing good relief of incisional pain. Hydromorphone is also a type of pain medication that may provide better management of deep abdominal pain. It is not yet known if giving liposomal bupivacaine with or without hydromorphone will work better in improving pain in patients with gynecological malignancies during the first 24 hours after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate if no additional intervention is noninferior to intrathecal analgesia (ITA) for postoperative pain experience 24 hours after surgery after laparotomy for gynecological malignancy within an established enhanced recovery pathway which includes incisional liposomal bupivacaine (ILB).

II. Evaluate the effect of intrathecal analgesia on patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia after laparotomy for gynecological malignancy.

III. Report the impact of ITA use on cost. IV. Validate the Quality of Recovery (QOR)-15 in our population.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine.

ARM II: Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine and hydromorphone intrathecally (IT).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (laparotomy, liposomal bupivacaine)

Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo laparotomy

Liposomal Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Arm II (laparotomy, liposomal bupivacaine, hydromorphone)

Patients undergo standard of care laparotomy and then receive liposomal bupivacaine and hydromorphone IT.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hydromorphone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

Laparotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo laparotomy

Liposomal Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hydromorphone

Given IT

Intervention Type DRUG

Laparotomy

Undergo laparotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Liposomal Bupivacaine

Drug

Intervention Type DRUG

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

(-)-Hydromorphone Dihydromorphinone Hydromorphon Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension Exparel

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective surgery for suspected (based on consulting surgeon's opinion-imaging, laboratory \[lab\], pathology \[path\]) gynecological malignancy, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to read or understand English
* Prehospitalization narcotic use if weekly average daily oral morphine equivalent of \> 20 mg
* Chronic pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia
* Extensive surgery planned (surrogate for post-operative \[postop\] pain): Planned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, abdominoperineal resection, exenteration, use of intraoperative radiation (IORT), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
* Contraindication to neuraxial analgesia:

* Coagulopathy

* International normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.2 current or predicted after surgery (e.g. planned right hepatic resection)
* Thrombocytopenia. Platelets (plts) \< 100
* Hemophiliac disease states (hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, etc.)
* Patients receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy are excluded according to the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) guidelines
* Localized infection at the potential site of injection
* Significant developmental or structural spinal abnormalities that would preclude a safe spinal technique. These include spina bifida, tethered spinal cord, lumbar spinal fusion, and active lumbar radiculopathy
* Patients with stage 4 or 5 kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] less than 30 ml/min per 1.73 m\^2)
* Intolerance or allergy to opioids, acetaminophen, or amide-type local anesthetics
* Current pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sean C Dowdy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2020-00609

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

19-010500

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MC2061

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MC2061

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimizing Recovery in Abdominoplasty
NCT04254692 TERMINATED PHASE4