Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-10
2022-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis Intrathecal bolus of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine could replace continuous epidural fentanyl infusion and would be an enough intraoperative analgesic modality with good intraoperative hemodynamic stability and less postoperative complications in orthotopic urinary bladder diversion patients.
Aim of the work The aim of this protocol is to document that intrathecal bolus of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine analgesia (a low coast analgesic modality) can replace continuous epidural fentanyl infusion analgesic modality with effective operative analgesia, intraoperative hemodynamic stability and less postoperative cumulative opioid induced complications in orthotopic urinary bladder diversion prolonged surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Epidural Steroids With Intrathecal Nalbuphine for Lower Abdominal Oncologic Surgery
NCT03276325
Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl With Bupivacaine in Children Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery
NCT02861716
Comparative Study Between Two Adjuvant Drugs to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries
NCT05323214
Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine
NCT06864416
Study of The Analgesic Profile of Two Adjuvants Added to Low Dose Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus One Adjuvant in Patients Undergoing Anal Surgery Using Spinal Anesthesia
NCT07114263
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Titration of epidural local anesthetic and opioid concentrations must be performed to attain a balance between providing optimal analgesia and avoiding hemodynamic instability. The addition of fentanyl does not prolong the sensory and motor block characteristics of dexmedetomidine .
Intrathecal dexmedetomidine is superior to intrathecal magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) during caesarean section with regard to duration of analgesia, pain severity and stress hormone levels. Dexmedetomidine has a rapid onset and longer duration of sensory block compared to MgSO4 .
Paramasivan and his colleagues documented that intrathecal dexmedetomidine has prolonged postoperative analgesic duration, reduced 24 hours pain intensity and reduced the incidence of shivering without an increase in other adverse effects compared to placebo .
Using dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgeries has longer duration of sensory and motor block and longer postoperative analgesia .
Mazy and his colleagues documented that intrathecal dexmedetomidine 10 micrograms (mic) and bupivacaine 20 milligram with or without fentanyl 25 mic were suitable for long orthopedic procedures within 6 hours duration. The addition of fentanyl does not prolong the sensory and motor block characteristics of dexmedetomidine. In favor of dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combination was the less hypotension and less sedative requirement .
Epidural fentanyl administered by a continuous infusion can provide an efficient postoperative analgesia and is responsible for a moderate ventilatory depression .
Patel Nagar and his colleagues documented that intrathecal dexmedetomidine of 10 micrograms when compared to lower doses as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine significantly prolongs the duration of sensory block, motor block, and analgesia. A disproportionate increase in the duration of analgesia and motor block produces both clinically and statistically significant prolongation of the duration of differential analgesia. Addition of 10 micrograms of intrathecal dexmedetomidine is associated with fewer requirements of postoperative analgesics in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries without any significant increase in the incidence of side effects .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Epidural Fentanyl group:
Epidural Fentanyl group: using an epidural catheter technique with epidural catheter set, and at L1-2 insertion level directed up to cover up to T6 sensory level, 5ml of bupivacaine 0.5%plus 50 micrograms fentanyl in a total volume of 40 ml added saline 0.9% (epidural injection of bolus of total Volume of 15 ml of 0.0625%bupivacaine with 1.25Mcg/ml fentanyl) then for next G anaesthesia hours to run in a 3-5 ml/h epidural infusion rate.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intrathecal dexmedetomidine group:
Intrathecal dexmedetomidine plus heavy bupivacaine then general A
INTRATHECAL dexmedetomidine INJECTION
intrathecal bolus of 3ml bupivacaine 0.5% (15mg) plus 10 micrograms dexmedetomidine at 2-3 or 3-4 spinal level.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
INTRATHECAL dexmedetomidine INJECTION
intrathecal bolus of 3ml bupivacaine 0.5% (15mg) plus 10 micrograms dexmedetomidine at 2-3 or 3-4 spinal level.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. American society of Anaethesiologists (ASA I-II).
3. Both sexes.
4. Age 18 - 70 years.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics or opioids as fentanyl.
3. General contraindications to spinal and epidural anaesthesia as thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy and severe dehydration.
4. Uncompensated Cardiac or hepatic patients.
5. Renal failure or respiratory failure patients.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MOHAMED GHANEM, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Urology Nephrology center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura Univeristy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medicine
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MS.21.10.1699(date 21/11/2021)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.