Cognitive Training and Social Interaction Effects on Cognitive Performance of Older Adults
NCT ID: NCT05016336
Last Updated: 2021-08-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-18
2019-02-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Cognitive Intervention for Older Adults With Memory Decline: A Pilot Study
NCT00609427
Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Memory Training Workshops in People From 65 to 80 Years
NCT02431182
Effects of Cognitive Strategy Training on Daily Function in People With Subjective Cognitive Decline
NCT04330404
The Effectiveness of Dual Task Training in Elderly With Cognitive Decline
NCT04689776
Making Memory Better for Seniors With Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT01532739
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A growing body of literature supports the notion that cognitive training may assist in promoting healthy brain aging and improve a wide range of cognitive abilities.
Cognitive training refers to a protocol consisting of a set of exercises designed to improve performance in one or several cognitive abilities. One approach to cognitive training mentioned in the literature is strategy training. Strategy training usually focuses on teaching specific strategies designed to help encode or retrieve information and involves techniques such as rehearsal, chunking, mental imagery, and story-formation.
A possible means for improving cognitive training outcomes is employing a socially interactive group-based cognitive training program versus an individual one. An abundance of studies has shown that social interaction may contribute to the slowing down of cognitive decline in old age.
Recent studies suggest that social interaction alone may not be beneficial for enhancing cognitive abilities, but when combined with a mental stimulus that requires cognitive effort, such improvement might be achieved.
Only a few studies to date have investigated the advantage of strategy training performed in-group vs individually and even fewer studies focused specifically on socially interactive learning methods. A recent pilot study combined cognitive training with social interaction for people with mild to moderate dementia and reported a significant cognitive improvement in favor of the social interaction group compared to the control group who was engaged in cognitive training only.
Social cognition is supported by an extensive system of limbic, cortical and subcortical brain regions. Many of these regions are also involved in episodic memory, semantic memory and other cognitive functions. Thus, it is possible that aspects of cognitive processing, which are activated through social interaction will also strengthen these cognitive abilities.
Engaging in social interaction usually consists of complex cognitive and memory challenges, which in turn may aid in enhancing cognitive abilities and cognitive reserve Training in a group setting can provide participants with an opportunity to problem-solve with a relevant peer group and allow individuals to gain comfort from sharing their concerns about memory.
The purpose of the current study was therefore to determine the effectiveness of a strategy-based cognitive training approach combined with a socially interactive learning method on cognitive performance and transferability of training gains for older adults.
Procedure:
Meetings of both groups were held in public community centers. A pre-session meeting was devoted to explaining the research objectives and signing consent forms. Prior to the first training meeting and after the program ended, cognitive evaluation measurements were taken individually from each subject. Before the final cognitive evaluation, participants were reminded to use the learned strategies.
Sample size assessment:
A priori power analysis using pilot data and the SimR package in R (version 1.0.5) suggested that 30 participants would provide sufficient power (power \> 80%) to detect the critical strategy training plus social interaction effect on cognitive performance.
Statistical analysis plan:
Data will be analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). The main analysis 'שד a mixed-design analysis that compares the experimental conditions (between-subject factors) regarding their effect on cognitive performance in 4 cognitive tests and 2-time points (within-subjects variables).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
strategy-based cognitive training + social interaction
The experimental group received twelve 60 minutes sessions of strategy-based cognitive training. (i.e., training in mnemonic memory strategies). We chose to train multiple strategies instead of a single one in effort to reach larger training gains. each session began with engaging conversations between the researcher and participants. After each practice trial, participants were encouraged to share their ideas/stories/associations or visual images (mnemonic uses) in turn. All other participants were allowed to give feedback relating to what can be learned from each mnemonic use or give their own ideas on how they think it can be improved.
Social interaction combined with cognitive training based on mnemonic strategies.
In the first six sessions, participants in the experimental group learned and practiced six different mnemonic strategies: Story-Formation strategy, Face-Name strategy, Peg-Word strategy, Chunking strategy, Key-Word strategy and the Method of Loci. In the following six sessions, in order to assimilate the strategies they learned, participants practiced the same tasks.
social interaction
The social interaction control group received the same number of group meetings but without the strategy training. Meetings content consisted of providing tools for making social connections, providing tools for interpersonal communication and raising the participant's sense of personal well-being through group contact.
Social interaction group
In the control group, each session also began with a conversation between the participants. The sessions then dealt with the content of interpersonal communication and the acquisition of tools for creating interpersonal relationships. Participants were asked to share the way they used the tools they acquired between sessions and received feedback from the other participants
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Social interaction combined with cognitive training based on mnemonic strategies.
In the first six sessions, participants in the experimental group learned and practiced six different mnemonic strategies: Story-Formation strategy, Face-Name strategy, Peg-Word strategy, Chunking strategy, Key-Word strategy and the Method of Loci. In the following six sessions, in order to assimilate the strategies they learned, participants practiced the same tasks.
Social interaction group
In the control group, each session also began with a conversation between the participants. The sessions then dealt with the content of interpersonal communication and the acquisition of tools for creating interpersonal relationships. Participants were asked to share the way they used the tools they acquired between sessions and received feedback from the other participants
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
64 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bar-Ilan University, Israel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michal Lavidor
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michal Lavidor, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Psychology, and the Gonda Brain Research center, Bar Ilan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bar Ilan University
Ramat Gan, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Choi M. Association between social participation and cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults living alone: Analysis of a nationally representative survey. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020 Aug;26(4):e12841. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12841. Epub 2020 May 27.
Hikichi H, Kondo K, Takeda T, Kawachi I. Social interaction and cognitive decline: Results of a 7-year community intervention. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2016 Dec 21;3(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2016.11.003. eCollection 2017 Jan.
Krueger KR, Wilson RS, Kamenetsky JM, Barnes LL, Bienias JL, Bennett DA. Social engagement and cognitive function in old age. Exp Aging Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;35(1):45-60. doi: 10.1080/03610730802545028.
Park DC, Gutchess AH, Meade ML, Stine-Morrow EA. Improving cognitive function in older adults: nontraditional approaches. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jun;62 Spec No 1:45-52. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.45.
Chan MY, Haber S, Drew LM, Park DC. Training Older Adults to Use Tablet Computers: Does It Enhance Cognitive Function? Gerontologist. 2016 Jun;56(3):475-84. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu057. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
Iizuka A, Suzuki H, Ogawa S, Kobayashi-Cuya KE, Kobayashi M, Inagaki H, Sugiyama M, Awata S, Takebayashi T, Fujiwara Y. Does social interaction influence the effect of cognitive intervention program? A randomized controlled trial using Go game. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;34(2):324-332. doi: 10.1002/gps.5024. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
Myhre JW, Mehl MR, Glisky EL. Cognitive Benefits of Online Social Networking for Healthy Older Adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;72(5):752-760. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw025.
Cavallini E, Dunlosky J, Bottiroli S, Hertzog C, Vecchi T. Promoting transfer in memory training for older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010 Aug;22(4):314-23. doi: 10.3275/6704. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
Valentijn SA, van Hooren SA, Bosma H, Touw DM, Jolles J, van Boxtel MP, Ponds RW. The effect of two types of memory training on subjective and objective memory performance in healthy individuals aged 55 years and older: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Apr;57(1):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.002.
Rouse HJ, Small BJ, Faust ME. Assessment of Cognitive Training & Social Interaction in People with Mild to Moderate Dementia: A Pilot Study. Clin Gerontol. 2019 Jul-Sep;42(4):421-434. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2019.1590489. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Tang Y, Arnold SE, Wilson RS. The effect of social networks on the relation between Alzheimer's disease pathology and level of cognitive function in old people: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2006 May;5(5):406-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70417-3.
Ertel KA, Glymour MM, Berkman LF. Effects of social integration on preserving memory function in a nationally representative US elderly population. Am J Public Health. 2008 Jul;98(7):1215-20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113654. Epub 2008 May 29.
Verhaeghen P, Marcoen A, Goossens L. Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Aging. 1992 Jun;7(2):242-51. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.2.242.
Flynn TM, Storandt M. Supplemental group discussions in memory training for older adults. Psychol Aging. 1990 Jun;5(2):178-81. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.5.2.178.
Chiu HF, Chan CK, Lam LC, Ng KO, Li SW, Wong M, Chan WF. The modified Fuld Verbal Fluency Test: a validation study in Hong Kong. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Sep;52(5):P247-50. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52b.5.p247.
Fairchild JK, Friedman L, Rosen AC, Yesavage JA. Which older adults maintain benefit from cognitive training? Use of signal detection methods to identify long-term treatment gains. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Apr;25(4):607-16. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002049. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition: Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment.
Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
08082021ML
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.